UT Insurance Bulletin 94-8
P.L. 103-432 — The Social Security Act Amendments of 1994 (Medicare Supplemental Technical Corrections
Bulletin 94-8
TO: All Medicare Supplemental Insurers
FROM: Utah State Insurance Department
DATE: December 12, 1994
SUBJECT: P.L. 103-432 -- The Social Security Act Amendments of 1994
(Medicare Supplemental Technical Corrections)
The Social Security Act Amendments of 1994 -- P.L. 103-432 (H.R. 5252) makes
several amendments to the federal requirements relating to Medicare
supplemental insurance. Several of these changes are effective October 31,
1994, the date of enactment of H.R. 5252. The purpose of this bulletin is to notify
you of these changes in an effort to assist you with complying with the revised
federal requirements. H.R. 5252 contains other provisions that will require
changes to the Medicare Supplement Insurance Minimum Standards Rule
R590-146 and may require amendments to the Medicare Supplement Insurance
Minimum Standards Act, 31A-22-620. This bulletin summarizes some of the major
components of H.R. 5252 that affect Medicare supplement insurance.
Open Enrollment - see 42 U.S.C. 1395 ss(s)
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 1990) required the
issuance of any Medicare supplement policy filed for use in this state to
anyone who is age 65 or older for which an application is submitted within 6
months of when the applicant first enrolls in Medicare part B. Individuals
who qualified for Medicare prior to age 65 and enrolled in Medicare part B
prior to age 65 by reason of disability or end stage renal disease were
previously not covered by the OBRA 1990 open enrollment because they
were not "first" enrolling in Medicare part B at age 65.
H.R. 5252 does not extend open enrollment to persons under age 65 who
are eligible for Medicare due to disability or end stage renal disease,
however it does give these individuals a 6-month open enrollment period
upon attainment of age 65. Under these provisions, persons are eligible for
a 6-month open enrollment period as of the first day they are both 65 years
of age or older and enrolled in Medicare part B
s not extend open enrollment to persons under age 65 who
are eligible for Medicare due to disability or end stage renal disease,
however it does give these individuals a 6-month open enrollment period
upon attainment of age 65. Under these provisions, persons are eligible for
a 6-month open enrollment period as of the first day they are both 65 years
of age or older and enrolled in Medicare part B. During the open enrollment
period, issuers may not deny or condition the issuance or effectiveness of
the Medicare supplement policy, or discriminate in the pricing of the policy,
because of health status, claims experience, receipt of health care, or
medical condition.
Additionally, all Medicare beneficiaries who turned 65 between November 5,
1991, and January 1, 1995, and who were not eligible for the OBRA 1990
open enrollment because they were enrolled in Medicare part B prior to
reaching age 65, are given a one-time 6-month open enrollment period
beginning January 1, 1995. This one-time federal open enrollment period
applies to any Medicare beneficiary who had part B coverage prior to age 65
and turned 65 between November 5, 1991, and January 1, 1995.
1.
Bulletin
http://www.insurance.utah.gov/bulletin/94-8.htm
1 of 3
6/25/2008 3:41 PM
Loss Ratio Provisions - see 42 U.S.C. 1395ss(r)
Under OBRA 1990, any policy issued after November 5, 1991, was required
to obtain a 65% loss ratio for individual policies and a 75% loss ratio for
group policies and to return to policyholders premium amounts collected in
excess of these standards. Compliance with these requirements is verified
through an annual filing of a worksheet showing the experience of those
policy forms. However, the effective date of the state requirement was not
the same as that of the federal requirement. H.R. 5252 resolves
the difference between the federal effective date and the state effective date
on refund calculations and also subjects all Medicare supplement policies
to the same loss ratio and refund calculation requirements
ng of a worksheet showing the experience of those
policy forms. However, the effective date of the state requirement was not
the same as that of the federal requirement. H.R. 5252 resolves
the difference between the federal effective date and the state effective date
on refund calculations and also subjects all Medicare supplement policies
to the same loss ratio and refund calculation requirements. However, for
policies issued prior to July 30, 1992, the requirement for the 65% loss ratio
requirement for individual policies and 75% loss ratio requirement for group
policies and refund or credit against future premium payments apply only to
the experience occurring after the revised standards are promulgated to
implement H.R. 5252.
2.
Duplication of Coverage - see 42 U.S.C. 1395 ss(d)
With the enactment of OBRA 1990, it has generally been a violation of
federal law to sell or issue a health insurance policy to a Medicare
beneficiary with knowledge that the policy duplicates health benefits
(Medicare, Medicaid, or private health coverage) to which the individual is
otherwise entitled. It is also unlawful for a company to sell a duplicate
Medicare supplemental policy to a Medicare beneficiary.
The revised federal law continues the prohibition against selling duplicate
Medicare supplemental policies. However, policies which duplicate Medicare
will be exempt from the prohibition if they pay benefits directly to the
beneficiary without regard to other coverage and the application for
insurance contains a clear statement disclosing the extent to which the
policies duplicate Medicare. The NAIC has until January 29, 1995, to
develop model disclosure statements and submit them to the Secretary of
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Secretary) for approval
and publication. Policies issued 60 days after publication and approval by
the Secretary of the disclosure language which duplicate Medicare must
include the approved disclosure statement on the application
dicare. The NAIC has until January 29, 1995, to
develop model disclosure statements and submit them to the Secretary of
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Secretary) for approval
and publication. Policies issued 60 days after publication and approval by
the Secretary of the disclosure language which duplicate Medicare must
include the approved disclosure statement on the application.
The current prohibition of sales of Medicare supplemental policies to
Medicaid beneficiaries has not changed. However, in addition to the existing
exception for situations in which Medicaid pays the premium, the revised
federal statute allows the sale of a Medicare supplemental policy to a
Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB), as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1396d(p)(1),
if the policy provides benefits for prescription drugs. This allows carriers to
sell Medicare supplemental standard plans H, I, and J to QMBs. QMBs are
persons at or below the federal poverty level who also meet certain other
resource limits. Additionally, companies may sell a Medicare supplemental
policy to a Specified Low-Income Medicare Beneficiary (SLMB). SLMBs are
persons at or below 120% of the federal poverty level meeting certain
resource limits. Medicaid pays only the part B premium for SLMBs and
covers none of the other cost sharing amounts under Medicare.
3.
Bulletin
http://www.insurance.utah.gov/bulletin/94-8.htm
2 of 3
6/25/2008 3:41 PM
Mailing of Policies - see 42 U.S.C. 1395 ss(d)(4)
OBRA 1990 prohibited issuers from mailing a duplicate copy of a Medicare
supplement policy to a policyholder unless the policy had been approved in
the state in which the policyholder permanently resides or the policy would
terminate within 12 months of being mailed. This affected persons who had
misplaced their policy or certificate and had moved to a state where it had
not been filed.
H.R
(d)(4)
OBRA 1990 prohibited issuers from mailing a duplicate copy of a Medicare
supplement policy to a policyholder unless the policy had been approved in
the state in which the policyholder permanently resides or the policy would
terminate within 12 months of being mailed. This affected persons who had
misplaced their policy or certificate and had moved to a state where it had
not been filed.
H.R. 5252 permits mailing a duplicate policy which has not been filed in the
policyholder's home state under any of the following circumstances:
the policy is guaranteed renewable;
It is a conversion to individual coverage required because the master
group policy terminated or the certificateholder has left the group;
A whole group policy is being replaced;
The individual is reinstating coverage which was suspended during a
period of Medicaid eligibility.
4.
DATED this 12th day of December, 1994.
Insurance Commissioner
[Back to Top]
Bulletin
http://www.insurance.utah.gov/bulletin/94-8.htm
3 of 3
6/25/2008 3:41 PM