For litigators

Walk into the hearing knowing the record cold

Petitions, replies, orders and annexures land as one pile. Justis reads all of it, builds the chronology, flags the limitation point, and tells you which Supreme Court or High Court authority actually governs the question you are arguing. Every citation links to the paragraph it came from.

An advocate in a black coat reviewing a case file in chambers

Every date, event and document, mapped

A matter arrives as a petition, three replies and a bundle of annexures. Justis reads all of it and builds the dated chronology, each entry carrying the document it came from, so the sequence you argue from is the record's own rather than a note someone typed on the way to court.

DateEventSource
12 Jan 2025FIR registered at SaketFIR.pdf
14 Jan 2025Arrest and first remandRemand order.pdf
21 Jan 2025Bail rejected by SessionsOrder 21-01.pdf
15 Mar 2025Day 60, no chargesheetCase diary.pdf
18 Mar 2025Extension, no reasonsOrder 18-03.pdf
28 Mar 2025Chargesheet, day 74Chargesheet.pdf
02 Apr 2025Cognizance takenOrder 02-04.pdf
19 Apr 2025Application, s.187(3)Application.docx
06 May 2025Reply filed by StateReply.pdf
21 May 2025Rejoinder filedRejoinder.docx
09 Jun 2025Charges framedOrder 09-06.pdf
27 Jun 2025P.W.1 examinedDeposition 1.pdf
14 Jul 2025P.W.3 cross-examinedDeposition 3.pdf

Find the holes before opposing counsel does

Every issue is read from both sides at once and scored: who is actually stronger on it, why, and the page that decides it. The weak points surface while there is still time to plead around them.

IssueStronger party
Default bail, day 61Accused — no chargesheet, day 60
Reasons for extensionAccused — the order records none
Sanction to prosecuteAccused — not on the file at all
Remand ordersOpen — two unsigned orders
Delay forwarding FIRState — explained by distance
Recovery memoState — two panch witnesses
Identification paradeOpen — never held, accused known
Statement, s.180Open — their copy is signed
Call detail recordsAccused — only a summary relied on
Medical reportAccused — supports the defence
Chain of custodyOpen — two gaps of six days

Compare testimony and surface the contradictions

Statements, depositions and cross-examination read side by side. Justis puts each witness in a column and every disputed fact in a row, so a contradiction is something you see rather than something you remember.

IssueAnjali SharmaRakesh Verma
Notice servedHanded over by handNever received it
14 May meetingPresent till 6 pmDid not take place
Signature on receiptIdentifies it as hersDenies the signature
₹2 lakh paidPaid in cashNo payment made
Who was presentNames four peopleNames two
Goods deliveredDelivered on 12 MayNever delivered
Prior demandMade twice by phoneDenies any demand
Cheque handed toGave it to VermaNever took it
Office was openOpen till 7 pmShut that week
Books of accountEntry on 14 MayNo such entry
RelationshipKnew him six yearsMet him twice
Reason for delayAwaited paymentNo dispute arose

Upload the case once, ask across it for its whole life

Every document in the matter sits in one project, read and indexed the moment it lands. Ask one question and it is answered for every file at once, and the same holds in eight months when the record has doubled and the junior who uploaded it has moved on.

DocumentWhat weakens this document?
FIR.pdfTime of dispatch left blankSections added in a different handInformant's signature not on the copy
Chargesheet.pdfFiled on day 74, beyond the periodSanction not annexedWitness list differs from diary
Case diary.pdfEntries for 14–18 March missingNo reasons recorded for extensionPages not numbered consecutively
Remand orders.pdfTwo orders carry no signatureGrounds identical across three datesNo application for the third
Statements.pdfThree witnesses share phrasingNone signed under s.180Dates of recording not stated

Legal teams already on the waitlist

Supreme Court of India
Patna High Court
Khaitan & Co
CARS24
SAIL
University of Delhi
NLU Mumbai
NLU Lucknow
Surepass
Delhi
We used to lose the first two days of every matter to reading in. Justis pulls the chronology, flags the limitation issue, and hands back a draft that already sounds like our chambers. Our juniors start from an argument now, not a blank page.
Vinod Kumar YadavPartner, Litigation, Delhi
FAQ

Common questions

Does it cover High Courts, or only the Supreme Court?

Both. The corpus runs to over 16 million Supreme Court and High Court judgments, reported and unreported, and you can restrict a search to one High Court when the point turns on local practice.

How do I know a citation is real?

Every authority the agent cites links to the paragraph of the judgment it came from, and the quoted words are verified against the source text before they are shown. If the words cannot be found, the citation is flagged rather than presented as checked.

Can it read a scanned or handwritten FIR or order?

Yes. Scanned PDFs are run through OCR, and the agent tells you it is reading a scan so you know transcription errors are possible. Where the handwriting is illegible it says so instead of guessing.

Will it draft in our chambers' style?

Once you train the digital twin on a handful of your own drafts, yes. It learns how you structure a reply, how you cite and how you address the court, and applies that to every new draft. Edits arrive as tracked changes you accept or reject in Word.

Is client material safe to upload?

Documents and chats are encrypted in transit and at rest, access is limited to the people on the matter, and nothing you upload is used to train models shared with anyone else.

What does it cost for a single practitioner?

Every account starts with a 7-day trial of 100 credits. Pro is ₹999 a month with 500 credits of usage, and you pay only the real cost of each research or drafting run against those credits.

Crafted for every kind of lawyer and firm. Start using today.

Get started