Criminal applications

Application by counsel for respondents seeking adjournment in criminal revision petition

Name: Justis AI
Availability: InStock

0 of 24 blanks filled

IN THE COURT OF Name of the presiding judge and court; LD. PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE; PATIALA HOUSE COURTS; NEW DELHI.

CR. REV. NO. Criminal revision number/2021

IN THE MATTER OF :-

Petitioner's name: PETITIONER

VERSUS

Respondents' names: RESPONDENTS

N.D.O.H.: Next date of hearing (day).Next date of hearing (month).Next date of hearing (year)

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF MAIN COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 2 AND 3 SEEKING AN ADJOURNMENT IN THE CAPTIONED MATTER.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

1.That the Criminal Revision Petition filed by the Petitioner is pending before this Hon'ble Court and is fixed for arguments on Date fixed for arguments (day).Date fixed for arguments (month).Date fixed for arguments (year).

2.That the Main Counsel, Mr. Main counsel's first name Main counsel's surname, appearing for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, will not be available at City where counsel is unavailable during Month of unavailability owing to some family exigency, and is required to travel out of station to Place counsel is travelling to for four to five days. It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly adjourn the matter to a date after Adjournment sought after (day).Adjournment sought after (month).Adjournment sought after (year), or to such other date as may be convenient to this Hon'ble Court.

PRAYER:-

In view of the aforesaid submissions and circumstances, it is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to adjourn the captioned matter to a date after Adjournment sought after (day).Adjournment sought after (month).Adjournment sought after (year), or to such other date as may be convenient to this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice.

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed accordingly.

DELHIFILED BY

DATED: Date of filing of the application

Name of the counsel filing the application

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel's office address,

Pincode of counsel's office.

Mob. No. Counsel's mobile number

Email: Counsel's email address

IN THE COURT OF Name of the presiding judge and court; LD. PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE; PATIALA HOUSE COURTS; NEW DELHI.

CR. REV. NO. Criminal revision number/2021

IN THE MATTER OF :-

Petitioner's name: PETITIONER

VERSUS

Respondents' names: RESPONDENTS

N.D.O.H.: Next date of hearing (day).Next date of hearing (month).Next date of hearing (year)

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF MAIN COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 2 AND 3 SEEKING AN ADJOURNMENT IN THE CAPTIONED MATTER.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

PRAYER:-

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed accordingly.

DELHIFILED BY

DATED: Date of filing of the application

Name of the counsel filing the application

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel's office address,

Pincode of counsel's office.

Mob. No. Counsel's mobile number

Email: Counsel's email address

1 / 1

All templates

IN THE COURT OF THE LD. ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, ROUSE AVENUE DISTRICT COURT,

NEW DELHI.

IN THE MATTER OF:

Applicant/accused's nameVERSUS Respondent's name

FIR NO. FIR number

U/S: 420/471/168 OF IPC

P.S.: Police station, District

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT / ACCUSED, Applicant/accused's name, FOR CANCELLATION OF THE LOOK-OUT CIRCULAR (LOC) OPENED / ISSUED AGAINST THE APPLICANT / ACCUSED IN CONNECTION WITH FIR NO. FIR number.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1.That the aforesaid case is pending before this Hon'ble Court, and the charge-sheet has been filed in the aforesaid FIR against the applicant / accused.

2.That there is no basis for the issuance of the LOC against the applicant / accused. It is pertinent to mention herein that notice under Section 41A of the CrPC was served upon the applicant / accused through WhatsApp or email, and the applicant has always given a reply / response to the same to the Investigating Officer of the case who issued the notice. The issuance of the LOC against the applicant is itself bad in law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The LOC, if any, pending in the name of the applicant / accused is also contrary to the objective for which an LOC may be issued.

Criminal applications