1991-009
Director's outside employment as expert witness
Cite as Alaska Op. Att'y Gen. No. 1991-009
Designated Ethics Supervisor
March 29, 1991
663-91-0381
465-3600
Director's outside
employment as expert
witness; Executive Branch
Ethics Act (AS 39.52)
James L. Baldwin
Assistant Attorney General
Governmental Affairs - Juneau
Under AS 39.52.240 you have requested an advisory
opinion on whether a public official serving as a director with
substantial budget and management responsibilities may serve as
an expert witness on behalf of a private litigant.
Background
Before accepting state employment the public official
was engaged to serve as an expert witness by a party involved in
civil litigation.
The litigation concerns alleged damages
incurred by a franchisee who lost or was denied a franchise.
Before accepting state employment, the public official advised
you, in your capacity as appointing authority, of the pending
litigation and his commitment to serve as a compensated expert
witness.
The expert witness services include the rendering of
opinions concerning lost profits of the franchisee.
We are
informed that the appointing authority expressly agreed to the
continuation of the outside employment to the conclusion of the
litigation.
Applicable law
The Executive Ethics Act (AS 39.52) establishes a
standard to be applied to outside employment for determining
whether the employment constitutes a violation.
Under the Act,
outside employment is permitted if it is reported to the
designated supervisor, is compatible, and does not conflict with
the proper discharge of official duties. AS 39.52.170.
Analysis
Based on the information available to us, it does not
appear that the outside employment is incompatible or conflicts
with
the current duties of the public official.
Those duties
include the supervision of a division that prepares the executive
budget, provides research and analysis on public policy issues,
and audits the operations of state agencies. The expert witness
services relate to a commercial activity that is unrelated to the
Designated Ethics Supervisor
March 29, 1991
AGO file: 663-91-0381
Page 2
state agency employing the state official.
The public official
claims that the commercial activity has no state contracts or
other significant involvement. The public official also asserts
that state time, equipment, and staff will not be used to perform
the outside employment. Nor will confidential information gained
through the official's official capacity be used in the
performance of these services.
Based on the information supplied and for the foregoing
reasons, we conclude that the outside employment as an expert
witness is permissible under the Executive Branch Ethics Act. If
you have further questions, please feel free to call me.
JLB:jr