1991-042
Proximity of construction equipment to power lines
Cite as Alaska Op. Att'y Gen. No. 1991-042
July 15, 1991
The Honorable
Commissioner
Nancy Bear Usera
Department of Labor
P.O. Box 21149
Juneau, AK
99802-1149
Re:
Proximity of
equipment to
Our File No.
construction
power lines
663-91-0499
Dear Commissioner Usera:
You have asked for an opinion on whether or not Alaska
Statute 18.60.670(1) permits an operator to place equipment 10 feet
away from an overhead power line, even though such equipment is
capable of lateral, vertical, or swinging motion and thus capable
of intruding into the 10-foot protective envelope.
In other words,
(1)
Can an operator place a piece of equipment that has a 100-foot
boom 10 feet from an overhead power line, so long as the operator
of the equipment keeps the equipment outside of the 10-foot
protective envelope;
or (2) must the operator place the equipment
in a manner such that the boom is 110 feet from the overhead power
line, so that there is not a possibility that the boom could enter
the 10-foot protective envelope?
It
is
our
opinion that AS 18.60.670(1) permits an
operator to place equipment outside the 10-foot envelope, even
though the equipment is capable of vertical, lateral, or swinging
motion and thus capable of penetrating into the 10-foot envelope.
The statutes AS 18.60.670 -- 18.60.695, only prohibit the actual
placement and operation of such equipment inside the 10-foot
Commissioner Usera
July 15, 1991
File No. 663-91-0499
Page 2
envelope.
We base this opinion on the statutory construction of AS
18.60.670 in conjunction with related statutes on overhead high
voltage lines, AS 18.60.675 -- 18.60.695.
AS 18.60.670 provides:
A person individually or through an agent
or employee may not
(1) place any type of tool, equipment, machinery
or material that is capable of lateral, vertical or
swinging motion, within 10 feet of a high voltage
overhead electrical line or conductor;
(2)
store, operate, erect, maintain, move or
transport tools, machinery, equipment, supplies,
materials, apparatus, buildings or other structures
within
10
feet
of
a
high
voltage
overhead
electrical line or conductor.
When a statute is ambiguous, a court will look to
statutes that relate to the same subject matter, particularly those
statutes
passed
at
the
same
time,
to
assist
the
court
in
interpreting it.
In Alaska Children's Services v. Williamson, 606
P.2d 786, 789 (Alaska 1980), the court stated:
The two statutes at issue here were enacted at the
same time and deal with the same subject matter.
They are in pari materia and should be construed
with one another and in such a manner as to give
maximum effect to each.
Similarly, in In re Estate of Hutchinson, 577 P.2d 1074, 1075
(Alaska 1978), the court stated:
"It is an established principle
of statutory construction that all sections of an act are to be
construed
together
so
that
all
have
meaning
and
no
section
conflicts with another."
See also Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union
of Pacific, 585 P.2d 870 (Alaska 1978).
Commissioner Usera
July 15, 1991
File No. 663-91-0499
Page 3
When construing safety legislation, as here, the court
will
liberally
construe
the
legislation
to
effectuate
the
legislation's purpose.
ITT Grinnell Corp. v. Donovan, 744 F.2d
344, 349 (3d Cir. 1984).
However, when construing a statute that
carries criminal penalties, the court strictly construes the
criminal statute and resolves ambiguities against the state.
Romeri v. State, 585 P.2d 679 (Alaska App. 1990).
A person who
violates
AS
18.60.670
is
guilty
of
a
misdemeanor
and
upon
conviction is punishable by a fine of not more than $500, or by
imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both.
In 1972, the legislature enacted AS 18.60.070 at the same
time it enacted all of the statutes related to overhead high
voltage power lines, AS 18.60.070 -- 18.60.095.
AS 18.60.675 is
particularly helpful in construing AS 18.60.670.
AS 18.60.675
provides that before one can operate equipment that is capable of
vertical, lateral, or swinging motion, the operator must place a
warning sign on the equipment that reads:
"It is unlawful to
operate this equipment within 10 feet of high voltage lines."
AS
18.60.675 provides:
A person individually or through an agent or
employee may not operate a crane, derrick, power
shovel,
drilling
rig,
hoisting
equipment,
or
similar apparatus, any part of which is capable of
vertical, lateral or swinging motion, unless the
operator
or
the
operator's
employer
posts
and
maintains in plain view of the operator, a durable
warning sign legible at 12 feet, that reads as
follows:
"It is unlawful to operate this equipment
within 10 feet of high voltage lines."
Commissioner Usera
July 15, 1991
File No. 663-91-0499
Page 4
In our opinion, AS 18.60.675 demonstrates that, with
respect to equipment that is capable of lateral, vertical, or
swinging motion, the legislature only intended that such equipment
not be actually placed or operated within the 10-foot protective
envelope.
If the legislature wanted to prohibit the placement or
operation of this type of equipment so that it could not possibly
enter the 10-foot protective envelope, it would have required the
sign to state that it was unlawful to place or operate the
equipment in such a way that it was possible for the equipment to
enter the 10-foot protective envelope.
Furthermore, it would
appear that we would create an internal inconsistency if we were to
interpret AS 18.60.670 to prohibit the placement of such equipment
so it could not possibly penetrate the 10-foot protective envelope,
when clearly AS 18.60.675 only requires an operator to post a sign
prohibiting the operator from actually penetrating the 10-foot
protective envelope.
Additionally, because a violation of AS
18.60.670 carries criminal penalties, a court very likely would
construe the statute in favor of the defendant.
Lastly, in interpreting a statute, a court will give some
deference
to
an
administrative
agency's
long-standing
interpretation of the statute.
State, Dept. of Rev. v. Alaska Pulp
America, 674 P.2d 268, 277 (Alaska 1983). The Alaska Department of
Labor has authority to adopt safety and health regulations pursuant
to AS 18.60.020.
In 1973, the Department adopted a Construction
Code and a General Safety Code.
Since then, the Department has
Commissioner Usera
July 15, 1991
File No. 663-91-0499
Page 5
allowed equipment, such as cranes, to operate up to the protective
envelope.
The Alaska Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and
Health Standards Construction Code addresses the minimum allowed
distances between power lines and equipment such as cranes.
Code
Sec. 05.140(a)(1)(O)(i) provides that equipment such as cranes may
not be operated within 10 feet of a power line.
Consequently, the
crane may be operated up to the protective envelope, even though it
is capable of intruding into the protective envelope.
Construction
Code Sec. 05.140(a)(1)(O)(i) provides, in pertinent part:
O.
Except where electrical distribution
and transmission lines have been de-energized
and visibly grounded at point of work or where
insulating barriers . . . have been erected .
. . equipment or machines shall be operated
proximate to power lines only in accordance
with the following:
(i)
For lines rated 50 kV. or below,
minimum clearance between the lines and any
part of the crane or load must be 10 feet;
(ii)
For lines rated over 50 kV., minimum
clearance between the lines and any part of
the crane or load must be 10 feet plus 0.4
inch for each 1 kV. over 50 kV., or twice the
length of the line insulator, but never less
than 10 feet;
(iii) In transit with no load and boom
lowered, the equipment clearance must be a
minimum of 4 feet for voltages less than 50
kV., and 10 feet for voltages over 50 kV., up
to and including 345 kV., and 16 feet for
voltages up to and including 750 kV.
It is fair to presume that when the Department of Labor adopted
these regulations, it had in mind AS 16.60.070 and knew its
Commissioner Usera
July 15, 1991
File No. 663-91-0499
Page 6
requirements.
The Department's adoption of these regulations
illustrates its long-standing interpretation of AS 18.60.070 that
the statute only prohibits the operation of equipment capable of
lateral,
vertical,
and
swinging
motion
inside
the
10-foot
protective envelope.
1/
In summary, it is our opinion an operator of equipment capable
of lateral, vertical, or swinging motion may work just outside the
10-foot protective envelope, as long as the equipment is never
allowed to penetrate that envelope.
If you should have any questions regarding this opinion,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
CHARLES E. COLE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
Toby N. Steinberger
Assistant Attorney General
1/
Construction Code Sec. 05.140(a)(1)(O) and General Safety Code
Sec. 01.0705(j) are the same as federal occupational and safety
regulation 29 U.S.C. 1926.550(a)(15).
Federal OSHA requires the
State of Alaska to have regulations as strict or stricter than
federal OSHA.
To the extent that the OSHA CC & GSC regulations
require a greater distance than 10 feet, the Department of Labor is
simply
complying
with
the
federal
mandate
that
the
state's
regulations be as strict as the federal regulations.
Moreover, if
the Department of Labor interpreted AS 18.60.070 to require that
any equipment capable of lateral, vertical, or swinging motion be
placed or operated so that there was no possibility it could come
within the 10-foot envelope, the Department of Labor could have
adopted such a regulation, because it would be stricter than the
federal regulation.
Commissioner Usera
July 15, 1991
File No. 663-91-0499
Page 7
TNS:reb:highpwr