1992-004
Adding default condition to debt instruments
Cite as Alaska Op. Att'y Gen. No. 1992-004
Martin Richard, Director
February 14, 1992
Division of Investments,
Department of Commerce and
663-92-0324
Economic Development
465-2398
Adding default condition
to debt instruments
Vincent L. Usera
Assistant Attorney General
Commercial Section - Juneau
You asked whether it would be permissible to add as a
condition of default on debt instruments (promissory notes, etc.)
that the full amount of the debt would become immediately due and
payable if the debtor permanently leaves the State of Alaska. 1/
You have asked specifically whether this might be incorporated
into notes with respect to loans from the Commercial Fishing
Revolving Loan Fund, for which borrowers are required to meet a
residency test.
At first blush it might seem a practicable
condition, making it easier to ensure repayment of the loan.
On
further review, however, our conclusion is that adding such a
provision would offend the constitutionally-guaranteed right to
travel.
The Supreme Court of the United States has repeatedly
found that the right to travel between the 50 states is a funda
mental right, even though not specifically enumerated in the
Constitution. In a leading case the Court said:
This Court long ago recognized that the
nature
of
our
Federal
Union
and
our
constitutional concepts of personal liberty
unite to require that all citizens be free to
travel throughout the length and breadth of
our land uninhibited by statutes, rules, or
regulations which un-reasonably burden or
restrict movement. "[T]he right [to travel]
finds
no
explicit
mention
in
the
Constitution.
The reason, it has been
suggested, is that a right so elementary was
1/
An immediate issue relative to enforcing such a provision
arises: Who is to determine the "permanency" of a move?
If the
debtor were to insist he intended to return to Alaska in the
future, the condition could not be invoked.
Martin Richard, Director
February 14, 1992
DCED
Page 2
663-92-0324
conceived
from
the
beginning
to
be
a
necessary concomitant of the stronger Union
the Consti-tution created."
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 629-30 (1969) (quoting from
United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745, 758 (1966)).
Not only is the state precluded from interfering with
the rights of citizens to travel unimpeded throughout the states,
"the right of interstate travel is constitutionally protected . .
. and is assertable against private as well as governmental
interfer- ence." Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 105 (1971)
(citations omitted).
Thus, even though no statute or regulation
is involved, the condition affects the right to travel and would
be impermissible no matter who might seek to impose it.
The effect of adding this condition to loan documents
would be to place a weighty burden on most who might seek to move
from Alaska while still owing on a state loan.
Most people in
that situation would effectively find themselves held hostage by
the loan.
We view this as an impermissible burden directly
affecting the right to travel.
The right to travel, more specifically the right to
interstate migration, has been found to be a fundamental right by
the Alaska Supreme Court. Hicklin v. Orbeck, 565 P.2d 159 (Alaska
1977), rev'd on other grounds, 437 U.S. 518 (1978).
As a
fundamental right, any obstacle to its exercise is subject to
strict scrut-iny to determine whether a compelling state interest
is furthered and whether it is the least restrictive means of
achieving that interest.
Here we are not looking at a statute,
but merely a policy. The policy, however, would be subject to the
same balanc-ing test, and it would most likely fail to pass
constitutional muster. See, e.g., Zobel v. Williams, 619 P.2d 448
(Alaska 1980), prob. juris. noted, 450 U.S. 908 (1981), rev'd on
other grounds, 457 U.S. 55 (1982) (Brennan, J., concurring);
Thomas v. Bailey, 595 P.2d 1 (Alaska 1979) (Rabinowitz, J.,
concurring).
Thus, we conclude that it would be an unconstitutional
infringement of the right to travel if the department added as a
condition of default on a loan the borrower's moving from the
State of Alaska.
VLU:prm