1992-011
Eliminating Government Offices from Power Cost Equalization Program
Cite as Alaska Op. Att'y Gen. No. 1992-011
Mr. Charlie Bussell
March 25, 1992
Executive Director
Alaska Energy Authority
661-92-0506
Department of Commerce and
Cross-reference:
Economic Development
661-92-0505
269-5100
Eliminating government
offices from Power Cost
Rhonda Butterfield Roberson
Equalization Program
Assistant Attorney General
Transportation Section, Anchorage
You have requested an opinion regarding the possible
exclusion of federal and state offices, and schools, from the
Power Cost Equalization Program by regulatory change.
Our
conclusion is that such an exclusion cannot be accomplished by a
change of regulations; rather a change in the applicable statutes
would be necessary to accomplish such an exclusion.
The Power Cost Equalization Program was begun in 1980,
in
order to provide "power production cost assistance to an
eligible electric utility."
Sec. 42, ch. 83, SLA 1980.
Later,
the legislature more specifically defined the aid as "for the
purpose of equalizing power cost per kilowatt-hour statewide at a
cost close or equal to the mean of the cost per kilowatt-hour in
Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau by paying money from the fund to
eligible electric utilities in the state." AS 44.83.162(a). Two
agencies, the Alaska Energy Authority and the Alaska Public
Utilities Commission, have been given specific roles in the
administration of this program.
The
legislature
has
set
out
specifications
for
eligibility, in terms of electric utilities and customers.
AS
44.83.162(c) provides:
(c) An eligible electric utility is entitled
to receive power cost equalization for
(1) sales
of
power
to
local
community
facilities, calculated in the aggregate for each
community served by the electric utility, for
actual consumption of not more than 70 kilowatt-
hours
per
month
for
each
resident
of
the
community; and
(2) actual consumption of not more than 750
kilowatt-hours per month sold to each customer in
all classes served by the electric utility except
to customers of the utility under (1) of this
subsection.
Charlie Bussell
March 25, 1992
Alaska Energy Authority
661-92-0506
Re: Eliminating Government Offices
661-92-0505
from Power Cost Equalization Program
Page 2
(Emphasis added.)
The legislature further provided, in AS
44.83.162(e):
Power cost equalization paid under this section
shall be used to reduce the cost of all power sold
to local community facilities, in the aggregate,
to the extent of 70 kilowatt-hours per month per
resident of the community, and to reduce the cost
of the first 750 kilowatt-hours per customer per
month for all other classes served by the electric
utility.
(Emphasis added.)
The use of the word "shall" is essentially a
mandate from the legislature, leaving no discretion in the
administering agency as to that particular section. In addition,
the phrases "all power sold to local community facilities" and
"all other classes served" leave no room for exclusion of any
class by the regulatory process.
It is clear from the plain
language of the statute that the legislature intended to include
all customers of eligible electric utilities, whether private,
residential, non-profit, commercial, or government. In addition,
there is no legislative history to suggest the legislature
intended otherwise.
The legislature has defined "community facility", in AS
44.83.162(p)(2), as follows:
(2)
"community facility" means a water and
sewer
facility,
public
outdoor
lighting,
charitable educational facility, or community
building whose operations are not paid for by the
state,
the
federal
government,
or
private
commercial interests[.]
By omission, the legislature has allowed any customer that is not
a "community facility" to fall into the "all other classes
served" category.
However, nowhere in the statutes has the legislature
permitted, or allowed one of the administering agencies to
permit, distinguishing between any other classes of electric
customers, or within classes of electric customers, for purposes
of differentials in rates or eligibility for the program. On the
contrary, the specific language quoted above in AS 44.83.162
indicates that "all power" to "all other classes" of customers
shall be subject to the program, so long as the eligible electric
utility itself complies with the program's requirements.
Charlie Bussell
March 25, 1992
Alaska Energy Authority
661-92-0506
Re: Eliminating Government Offices
661-92-0505
from Power Cost Equalization Program
Page 3
In conclusion, there appears to be no authority by
which the Alaska Energy Authority could, by regulation, alter the
classes of utility customers eligible for the Power Cost
Equalization Program. This conclusion is reached specifically as
to your question about the exclusion of eligibility and benefits
to federal offices, state offices, and schools. In our opinion,
a change in
applicable statutes, AS 44.83.162-44.83.165, would
be necessary to distinguish between such classes of customers.
RBR:bb