Delinquency Rule 4
Rule 4. Appointment and Authority of Masters
Cite as Alaska Delinq. R. 4
Appointment and Authority of Masters.
(a) Appointment. The presiding judge may appoint a
standing master to conduct any or all of the delinquency
proceedings listed in subparagraph (b)(2). Appointments of
standing masters must be reviewed annually. The presiding
judge may appoint a special master to conduct a proceeding
which is specified in the order of reference and is listed in
subparagraph (b)(2).
(b) Authority, Order of Reference.
(1) An order of reference specifying the extent of the
master’s authority and the type of appointment must be entered
in every case assigned to a master. The order of reference must
be served on all parties.
(2) The following proceedings may be referred to a
master:
(A) temporary detention and arraignment proceedings;
(B) interim hearings, including detention review, change
of plea and pre-trial conferences;
(C) non-jury adjudication hearings and disposition
hearings resulting from a non-jury adjudication, provided all
parties stipulate to both hearings before the master;
(D) disposition following an admit plea, post-disposition
review, probation revocation and extension of custody
hearings.
(3) A master’s report is not binding until approved by a
superior court judge pursuant to Civil Rule 53(d) and
paragraph (f) of this rule, except:
(A) a master may enter orders without further approval of
the superior court pursuant to Civil Rule 53(b) and (c), and by
paragraph (d) of this rule; and
(B) a master’s order of detention or placement outside the
home is effective pending superior court review.
(c) Objection to Reference to a Master. The
prosecution and the defense are entitled as a matter of right to a
change of one judge and one master pursuant to the procedures
stated in Criminal Rule 25(d). In addition, a party may file an
objection to a case or proceeding being referred to a master in
the following manner:
(1) Timeliness. A party may file an objection no later
than five days after receiving notice of the order of reference.
(2) Grounds for Objection. An objection to the
assignment of a master to hear a probation revocation hearing
or an extension of custody hearing under Delinquent Rules 24
and 25(c) will be granted as a matter of right. Any other
objection must set forth sufficient grounds from which the
court may determine whether good cause exists to remove the
matter from the master’s jurisdiction. Good cause may include
involvement of (i) complex questions of law which require a
decision by a superior court judge or (ii) questions requiring
prompt resolution which would be seriously impaired by a
reference to a master.
(d) Standing Master’s Authority to Enter Orders. A
standing master is authorized to take the following actions
without further approval by a superior court judge:
(1) issue an arrest warrant;
(2) appoint counsel or a guardian ad litem for the
juvenile;
(3) order home studies, predisposition reports, and
psychological or psychiatric evaluations;
(4) set hearings and order continuances of hearings held
before the master;
(5) decide motions requesting expedited review pursuant
to Civil Rule 77(g);
(6) accept and approve stipulations, except that stipulated
adjudications or dispositions must be reviewed by a superior
court judge;
(7) review and approve uncontested orders on annual
review under Delinquency Rule 25(a);
(8) order release from detention and set conditions of
release pursuant to Delinquency Rule 12(c); and
(9) order conditions of probation for minors placed on
probation or released from institutionalization.
(e) Master’s Report, Recommendations. A master may
issue a written report or oral findings on the record concerning
an order or recommendation which must be approved by a
superior court judge. The master shall advise the parties on the
record of their right to file objections to any such report or
recommendation pursuant to paragraph (f) of this rule.
(f) Objections to Master’s Report, Recommenda-
tions.
(1) Objections, Reply, Oral Argument. Objections to a
master’s report or recommendation must be filed within 10
days of entry of the findings or service of the report unless the
court requires objection to be filed earlier. In the case of a
recommendation rendered orally on record where a party
requests an electronic recording of the recommendation, the
time period for objection runs from receipt of the recording. A
reply to the objections must be filed within three days of
service of the objections. The superior court may permit oral
argument, order the taking of further evidence, or grant a
hearing de novo.
(2) Request for Stay, Immediate Review. A party may
request that a superior court judge stay a master’s order issued
under paragraph (d) pending review of the order.
(3) Review of Detention or Placement Outside the Home
Order. A master’s order for detention or placement outside the
home which is not stayed must be reviewed by the superior
court by the end of the next working day if a party so requests.
Note:
Chapter 70 SLA 2005 (SB 154) enacted changes
concerning proceedings relating to delinquent minors.
According to section 10 of the Act, the changes made by
sections 1-8 of the Act have the effect of amending
Delinquency Rule 4(f)(3) by requiring the court to conform the
rule to the statutory changes to acknowledge the inclusion of
certain persons 18 years of age or over as minors under AS
47.12 and AS 47.14 and to acknowledge the special statutory
provisions contained in sections 1-8 of the Act applicable to
those persons.