1979-0157
Alabama Attorney General Opinion 1979-0157
Cite as Ala. A.G. Opinion No. 1979-0157
44
Or 0.5%
CHARLES A. GRADDICK
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ALABAMA
APR 2s 1979
OFFICE
LEE L. HALE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
WILLIAM M. BENURS. JR .
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
WALTER S. TURNER
CHIEF ASSI5TAN I ATTORNEY GENERAL
JANIE NOSLES
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Doisr7
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING
44 NORTH UNION STREET
MONTGOMERY.
Sella
AREA 120111. 134-111 SO
Perry County Commission
Perry County Courthouse
Marion, Alabama 36756
ATTENTION: Mr. Kirtley W. Brown
County Attorney
Counties-Perry County-Private
Roads-Local Laws
County work on private roads
discussed.
Opinion by Assistant Attorney
General Stephens
Dear Commissioners:
We have received and considered at great length your
request for an Attorney General's opinion as to whether the
Perry County Commission may construct and maintain roads
and right-of-ways leading to private dwellings pursuant to
Act No. 325 of the 1976 Regular Session of the Alabama
Legislature and whether roads generally and..of necessity
traversed for mail routes and passage of public school
buses ought to be considered as public roads rather than
private roads.
Your questions obviously arose as a result of the
opinion which this office issued under date of January 19,
1979 to the Honorable Tom Young, District Attorney of
Randolph County, which opinion stated that the County
Commission of Randolph County was not authorized to perform
work on private roads. That opinion was based upon several
considerations, a discussion of which might be helpful here.
,—.-7ANISSISIGEIGLASSIGIZIEMINowasantinnyAnNNANANAR-------.
Perry County Commission
Page Two
First, it is axiomatic in judicial considerations that
a county and municipality can exercise only those powers
granted by the Constitution or statutes.
Secondly, Amendment #112 to the Constitution of Alabama
1901, amended Section 94 of said Constitution which was
identified as Sec. 55 of Constitution of Alabama 1875 and
carried forward almost the identical language used as follows:
"The legislature shall not have power
to authorize any county, city, town, or
other subdivision of this state to lend
its credit, or to grant public money or
thing of value in aid of, or to any in-
dividual, association, or corporation
whatsoever, or to become a stockholder in
any such corporation, association, or
company, by issuing bonds or otherwise.
It is provided, however, that the legis-
lature may enact general, special, or
local laws authorizing political sub-
divisions and public bodies to alienate,
with or without a valuable consideration,
public parks and playgrounds, or other
public recreational facilities and public
housing projects, conditional upon the
approval of a majority of the duly
qualified electors of the county, city,
town, or other subdivision affected
thereby, voting at an election held for
such purpose."
The framers of our Constitution inserted this protective
measure to prevent waste of public funds and temptation for
political purpose and favoritism.
Also, Amendment #93 to the Constitution of 1901, as
amended by Amendment No. 354, provides in pertinent part as
follows:
"No moneys derived from any fees,
excises, or license taxes, levied by
the state, relating to registration,
operation, or use of vehicles upon the
public highways except a vehicle-use
srr
Perry County Commission
Page Three
tax imposed in lieu of a sales tax,
and no moneys derived from any fee,
excises, or license taxes, levied by
the state, relating to fuels used
for propelling such vehicles except
pump taxes, shall be expended for
other than cost of administering such
laws, statutory refunds and adjust-
ments allowed therein, cost of con-
struction, reconstruction, maintenance
and repair of public highways and
bridges, costs of highway rights-of-
way, payment of highway obligations,
the cost of traffic regulation, and
the expense of enforcing state
traffic and motor vehicle laws. The
provisions of this amendment shall
not apply to any such fees, excises,
or license taxes now levied by the
state for school purposes for this
whole state or for any county or
city board of education therein;..."
Code of Alabama 1975, §23-1-80 originated from Act #347,
Acts of Alabama 1927, page 348 (The Alabama. Highway Code) and
provides as follows:
"The county commissions of the
several counties of this state have
general superintendence of the public
roads, bridges and ferries'within
their respective counties so as to,
render travel over the same as safe
and convenient as practicable. To
this end, they have legislative and
executive powers, except as limited
in this chapter. They may establish,
promulgate, and enforce rules and
regulations, make and enter into such
contracts as may be necessary or as
may be deemed necessary or advisable
by such commissions to build, construct,
make, improve and maintain a good
system of public roads, bridges and
Perry County Commission
Page Four
ferries in their respective counties,
and regulate the use thereof; but no
contract for the construction or repair
of any public roads, bridge or bridges
shall be made where the payment of the
contract price for such work shall ex-
tend over a period of more than 20
years."
It is noted that the original act deals with public roads
and that the 1975 Code specifies public roads, bridges and
ferries. The only reasonable and logical interpretation
leads to but one conclusion: viz., so-called state "gas
tax" funds may be expended by counties for "public road"
purposes only.
Still further, Section 36-10-14 provides, in pertinent
part, that
"(a) No public officer shall:
...(3) Employ or use any person, money
or property under his official control
or direction or in his official custody
for the private benefit or gain of him-
self or another."
Considering all of the above constitutional and
statutory provisions and principles of law this office con-
cluded that it was illegal for county commissions to do work
on private roads.
Unlike the question presented by Mr. Young, your
question concerns the constitutionality of a local ac: which
is applicable to Perry County and which provides that the
county commission may perform work on private roads and
drives. Some of the same principles and provisions of law
which are discussed above as the basis for the opinion to
Mr. Young may, however, also be applicable to a consideration
of the question you have posed. Still another factor to be
considered is the applicability of §105 of the State Consti-
tution which prohibits the legislature from enacting a local
law in any case which is provided for by a general law.
There are several other counties, in addition to Perry
County, which have local laws purporting to authorize the
Perry County Commission
Page Five
county commissions to work on private roads and this office
has received inquiries about them also. However, an
Attorney General's opinion, being advisory in nature, would
not resolve the questions raised by these local laws and the
courts will probably have to eventually decide this_iesue.
Therefore, this office will not express an opinion on 'the
constitutionality of those laws but offers the above dis-
cussion for consideration by appropriate officials.
Sincerely,
eLJuaz. stasta
CHARLES A. GRADDICK
Attorney General
CAG:bs