1979-0094
Alabama Attorney General Opinion 1979-0094
Cite as Ala. A.G. Opinion No. 1979-0094
gar
V/
S. TURNER
cNIEF ASST
REV
LEE L. HALE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY
WILINAM M. BERLINS. IR
EXECUTIVE ASS)
•
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
r) 9- oco
CHARLES A. GRAODICK
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ALABAMA
APR 1 L 1979
ADMIPIISTNATIVIIIIMONte
WONAMIS T
M
Ala.14101A 341 S4I
ASIA 4350.1144/1511
JAMIE NOBLES
ADMINISTRATIVE ARSISITAINT
Honorable Robert H. Kirksey
-Judge of Probate
Pickens County Commission
P. 0. Box 460
Carrollton, Alabama 35447
Sheriffs - Retirement Systems
Discussion of deductions from
salary of sheriff by county
for sheriff's retirement
system. Deductions from
sheriff's salary for retirement
system was to begin when Act
No. 1231 became law.
Dear Judge Kirksey:
This is to acknowledge your request for an opinion from the
Attorney General concerning Act No. 1231, Acts of Alabama 1975,
p. 2591.
1. Is Act 1231 of the 1975 Regular Session
of the Alabama Legislature, which provides
for a retirement system for the Sheriffs of
the various counties within the State,
constitutional? (We note that certain
counties are excluded from its coverage.)
2. If you rule that this Act is constitutional,
then we would inquire as to whether it is
permissive or mandatory on the County Commission
to make the deductions from the Sheriff's
salary as provided in the Act. (Section 4.
of the Act contains a sentence which reeds
Honorable Robert H. Kirksey
Pickens County Commission
Page Two
as folloWs: "However, this act is
permissive in nature and the govern-
ing body of said county may decline
to make such payments". We note that
this sentence does not say that this
Section is permissive but that this
Act is permissive.) (underline is ours)
It appears to us that such a provision
(tb withhold from the Sheriff's salary,
then permitting the County Commission
to refuse to make payments to him upon
his so-called retirement) would be so
imminently unfair that the only reason-
able construction remaining would be
that the Legislature did mean as it
states in Section 4 - that the entire
"act" is permissive.
3. If you rule that this Act is
constitutional, would it have been
proper for the County Commission to
deduct the presumed sums from the
Sheriff's salary prior to his present
term of office which began on January
16, 1979.
Enclosed for your information is an opinion of former
Attorney General Baxley to the Honorable T. M. Brantley, the
Attorney for Baldwin County, dated September 15, 1976,
regarding the validity of Act No. 1231. We express no further
opinion on this question.
Turning to your second question, Act No. 1231 in addition
to being permissive in the nature of permitting a county to
choose not to make retirement payments under the Act, is also
permissive in the nature that a sheriff may choose whether he
would like to come under the retirement plan established by
Act No. 1231 or some other state or county retirement system.
This is stated in Sections 3 and 5 of the Act. In the event
that the sheriff does choose to come under the retirement plan
of Act No. 1231, it is mandatory that the county make the
deductions from his salary as set out in Section 3. Note that
91kida-1/%-
L DA F. KNIGHT
Assistant Attorney General
Honorable Robert H. Kirksey
Pickens County Commission
Page Three
although the county may refuse to make payments under the
retirement plan, it must return all contributions made by the
sheriff.
Your last question is also to be answered in the affirmative.
Section 10 of-Act No. 1231 supra stated that the Act is to become
effective immediately upon its passage and approval by the
Governor or upon its otherWise becoming a law. Therefore, the
county was to begin deducting contributions from the salary of
the sheriff as soon as it became law on October 10, 1975. Act
No. 1231 supra is codified at Code of Alabama 1975, Section
36-22-40 through 36-22-45. Section 36-22-42 states that the
governing body of each county shall begin the deductions from
the salary of the sheriff for the sheriff's retirement system
starting October 10, 1975. There is no provision stating that
such deductions were to begin at the start of the next term of
the sheriff.
If our office can be of further assistance to you, please
do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
CHARLES A. GRADDICK
Attorney General
By-
LFK/sg