1979-0100
Alabama Attorney General Opinion 1979-0100
Cite as Ala. A.G. Opinion No. 1979-0100
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
79- 00/00
LEE L. HALE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY
WILLIAM Me JR
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
CHARLES A. GRADDICK
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ALABAMA
MAR 1 9 1979
ADMINI S
LYE •UILOIN
St UNION
SITS
AREA (SOS). •26•1110
W TURNER
CHUM ASSISTANT ATTORNEY
JAMIE NOBLES
ADMINI
IV! ASSISTANT
Mr. Theron 0. McDowell, Jr.
City Attorney
132 West Main Street
Prattville, Alabama 36067
Municipalities - Firefighters
1. The Continued employment of
a. person convicted of Attempted
Burglary Second Degree, after
such conviction is discovered,
violates the Alabama Fire Fighters
Personnel Standards and Education
Act (Act 863 Regular Session 1975).
2. If no fraud is involved in
that person's contract of employ-
ment, that person is entitled to
severance pay.
Dear Mr.. McDowell:
Your request of February 7, 1979, on behalf of the City
of Prattville, to this office has been received with your
problem presented as follows:
"The City of Prattville on January 2, 1976,
employed a person to fill the position of
fire fighter #2 (City of Prattville Fire
Department), and he began to faithfully
fulfill his duties. The City has now dis-
covered that on January 9, 1973, he was
convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of
'attempted burglary second degree' and
sentenced to County Jail for a period of
six (6) months with probation.
Mr. Theron (Y. McDowell, Jr.
Page Two
"Does the continued employment by the City
of Prattville; after the discovery of the
aforesaid conviction, violate the Alabama
Fire Fighters Personnel Standards and
Education Act (Act 863 Regular Session 1975),
and if he is disqualified, doed the person
who issues his severance pay violate Sedtion
8 of this Act?"
Sectian 7 and subseCtion (e) of Act 863 Regular SeSsion
1975 read,as follows:
"Section 7. Minimum Standards. The mini-
mum standards hereafter in this section pro-
vided shall apply to applicants and appointees
as firefighting personnel who are not fire-
fighters in the State on the effective date
of this Act and to applicants and appointees
who, though firefighters on the effective date
of this Act, cease to be such before making
application for employment as a firefighter or
being employed as a firefighter. No city or
town shall employ any such applicant who is
not on the effective date of this Act a fire-
fighter and who continues until the date of
his application as a firefighter unless such
person shall have first submitted to the
appointing authority an application for such
employment verified by affidavit of the appli-
cant, and showing compliance with the following
qualifications:
"(e) Character. The applicant shall be a
person of good moral: character and: reputation.
His' application shall show that he has never •
•
been convicted, of A felony or A thltddthAddor
involving Either- force,' ViblAnte
moral
ttirpitOdi;hand shall be accompanied by letters
from three.qnalified voters of the area in
which the applicant proposes to serve as a
firefighter attesting. hiS good reputation.
- Mr. Theron 0. McDowell, Jr.
Page Three
"The foregoing requirements shall not apply
to any person who is pretiently employed as
a firefighter in the State and whd continues
to be 46 eMployed when he 'naked application
for or isjamployed- as a firefighter in a
diffetent capacity or for a different employer."
[Emphasis added]
Section 8 of said Act reads:
"Section 8. Penalties. Any person who shall
appoint any applicant who, to the knowledge
of the appointor, fails to meet the qualifica-
tions as a firefighter provided in Section 8
of this Act, or the standards, rules and regu-
lations issued by the Commission under this
Act, and any person who signs the warrant or
check for the payment of the salary of any
person who, to the knowledge of the signer,
fails to meet the qualifications as a fire-
fighter provided in Section 8 of this Act,
or any. standard, rule or regulation issued
pursuant to the Act shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be
subject to a fine not exceeding $1,000."
[Emphasis added]
Thus, any person who appoints an applicant who has been
convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving either force,
violence 'or moral turpitude, or any =pperson who continues the em-
ployment of said applicant after such knowledge of conviction
is acquired, is in violation of said Act.
The question of whether or not severance pay should be
paid to an employee depends largely upon the provisions of the
contract of employment where said contract is held to be valid.
U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co. v. Nettles, 39 Ala. App. 115, 96 So.
2d 186 (1957). Note, however, that where the employee has
intentionally made misrepresentations to his employer relative
to a material fact of his character, the contract is void ab
initio, or from the beginning, because of that deception or _
that "vitiating fraud. Bankers'
Mortgage Company v. Rosenthal,
226 Ala. 135, 145 So. 456 (1933). Accordingly, the employee will
not be entitled to severance pay. Any person who, with knowledge
of the employee's failure to meet the above-stated qualifications,
authorizes continued payment of salary to said employee is in
violation of said Act.
Mr. Theron 0. McDowell, Jr.
Page Four
However, where there was no attempt on the part of the
employee to- mislead his eMployet (either by spoken word or by
information given on the contract of employment) and no inquiry
was made by the employer into the employee's charactet (or an
inquiry was made and thtoughho fault of his own the employee's
prior conviction was not detected), the etployee should .not
bear.the burden of having his eMployment terminated without
benefit of severance pay when knowledge:of-the employee's prior
conviction is later gained. 'AMetitaU - Security Life Insurance
Company v. Mien,
- 37 Ala. App. 552, 72 So. 2d 132 (1954) This
is especially true Whete the employment contract doed not in-
clude provisions for forfeiture of severance pay upon the later
determination of an employees initial unqualification. . In
such a case; authorization of severance pay should not be in
violation of said Act.
Yours very truly,
CHARLES A. GRADDICK
ATTORNEY GENERAL
By-
MEB:dpr