85-143
To clarify Opinion No. 85-131. This opinion involves releasing a teacher from her contract with a school district so that she or he may represent a teacher's organization full time. The opinion states that there are no statutes dispositive of the question, and that a local school distr
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-143
STATE OF ARKANSAS”
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL a ae )
\ ae eel
OPINION NO. 85-143
June 19, 1985
The Honorable Ron Fuller
State Representative
10020 Rodney Parham - West
Suite D
Little Rock, AR 72207
Dear Representative Fuller:
In response to your opinion request to clarify Attorney
General opinion 85-131 the following answers are provided to
the question you posed.
l. Does public law prohibit a district from entering
an agreement with the following provisions:
The district will release the teacher from all
duties for the purpose of representing the
teacher association and conducting association
business. One hundred percent (100%) of salary
and social security costs will be repaid by the
teacher organization to the school district. ;
All other benefits, i.e., retirement, insurance,
etc. will be borne by the district and the state.
Service as association president will count to-
ward accumulation of seniority, tenure, and other
benefits accrued as though the teacher were
teaching. Upon completion, the teacher will return
to the teacher's present assignment.
No. As stated in opinion 85-131 there are no dispositive
statutes which clearly prohibit such an agreement.
2. Is it permissible for a local district to have such
a policy agreement?
Yes. This is a matter for local determination.
Sincerely,
Attorney General
JSC:1ldc