85-223
Can the people, a majority of the legal voters in the Ross Van Ness school district, hold an election by petitioning the Governor, or any agency, to let the people decide which school district, Lakeside or Eudora, they want to consolidate with? No. Act 61 of 1983 6-15-207 6-18-307
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-223
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO, 85-223
December 27, 1985
The Honorable Geno Mazzanti, dr.
Representative, District 100
Route 1, Box 225
Lake Village, Arkansas 71653
Dear Representative Mazzanti:
This is in response to your opinion request wherein you ask:
Whether a majority of the legal voters in the Ross Van
Ness School District (Chicot County) could hold an
election by petitioning the Governor, or any agency,
to let the people decide by vote which school district
(Lakeside or Eudora) they want to consolidate with.
In response to your question, it is the opinion of this
Office that the answer to your question is no.
. As you point out in your letter, the Circuit Court has
) assigned the Ross Van Ness School District to the Eudora
° District. This annexation occurred pursuant to Act 61 of
1983 (First Extraordinary Session). Thus, as I understand
the situation in your District, your question is actually
whether the patrons of a school district can overrule an
annexation initiated by the school board and ordered by
either the county board of education or the circuit court.
Enclosed for your consideration are two opinions previously
issued by this Office to Senator Nick Wilson (Opinion 85-80)
and Representative Balton (Opinion 85-179). These opinions
make clear that Act 61 of 1983 (First Extraordinary Session)
vests discretion in the board of directors of a school
district to decide the appropriate school district to which
to annex. There is no provision in the law which would
allow the patrons to overrule the actions of their school
board, the county board of education or the circuit court in
this matter.
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared
by Assistant Attorney General C. Randy McNair, III.
Attorn y General
JSC:CRM:jk
Encl.