85-230
If land was purchased at a foreclosure sale in January of 1982 because of delinquent municipal recreation improvement district assessments, and the taxes were not delinquent, is title received at the sale defective because the sale was on the wrong date? No. 26-37-101 et seq. 14-90-911 .
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-230
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
“) STEVE CLARK (801) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL
OPINION NO. 85-230
December 30, 1985
Honorable Charlie Daniels
Commissioner of State Lands
State Capitol Building
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Daniels:
You have requested the opinion of this Office on the
following two(2) questions.
l. If land was purchased at a foreclosure sale
conducted in Arkansas in January of 1982 on
account of delinquent municipal recreation im-
provement district assessments, and the ad valorem
property taxes were not then delinquent, nor since
delinquent, is the title to the land acquired at
the foreclosure sale defective simply becasue the
5 foreclosure sale occurred on a date other than the
date established by law for the sale of the
property for collection of delinquent ad volrem
property taxes?
2. If land was purchased at a foreclosure sale con-
ducted in Arkansas in January of 1982 on account
of delinquent municipal recreation improvement
district assessments and the ad volrem property
taxes on that land were delinquent at that time,
and are still delinquent, is the purchaser at the
-foreclosure sale entitled to redeem the land under
Act 626 of .1983? —
The answer to question one(1) is that such a title is
not defective simply because the foreclosure sale occurred
on a date other than the date established by law for the
sale of property for collection of delinquent ad valorem
property taxes. In 1982, the year in which you say the sale
took place, sales of tax delinquent real property for ad
valorem property taxes were to be held on the fourth Wednesday
in November next after the publication of the delinquent
Daniels Opinion
December 30, 1985
Page 2
list, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Ark.
Stat. Ann. §84-1105 (1980 Repl.). The sales of land subject
to delinquent municipal improvement district taxes, on the
other hand, would be by foreclosure suit in the Chancery
Court pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. §20-418.13 (1968 Repl.).
Since delinquent municipal recreation improvement district
sales are by foreclosure rather than the statutorily pre-
scribed method of sale for delinquent ad valorem property
taxes, the fact that an improvement district sale took place
on a different date than that mandated by law for the sale
of property for collection of delinquent ad valorem property
taxes would not affect title.
In answer to your second question, the purchaser ata
delinguent municipal recreation improvement district fore-
closure sale may redeem the land under Act 626 of 1983.
Ark. Stat. Ann. §20-1147 (1968 Repl.) states in relevant
part:
PURCHASER AT DISTRICT TAX SALE MAY REDEEM FROM STATE. -
Where any lands have been or shall hereafter be fore-
closed on by any improvement district for delinquent
taxes or assessments due it, and the title to any of
such lands may have been or is in the State, the
purchaser at any sale for such improvement district
taxes shall have the right to redeem same from the
State. .. . Such a purchaser ... shall have a lien
thereon for such sums so paid to the State.
' Therefore, such a purchaser may redeem from the State
pursuant to Act 626 of 1983.
The “foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was
prepared by Assistant Attorney General Tim Humphries.
Sincerely,
Lalas |
Attorhey General
SC/TCH/1jm