86-117
In applying for and receiving a valid driver's license, has a citizen waived any rights that are constitutionally protected? Which ones? Q2) Is the license evidence of a contract, or quasi-contract, between the licensee and the state? If so, are the terms of the contract the traffic statutes of A
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 86-117
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
201 EAST MARKHAM STREET
f STEVE CLARK HERITAGE WEST BUILDING . (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 oo
OPINION NO. 86-117 sis a 7
tht
April 29, 1986
Honorable Ron Fuller
State Representative’
10020 Rodney ‘Parham - West
Suite D
Little Rock, AR 72207 .
‘Dear Representative Fuller:
This office is in receipt of your letter requesting an.
opinion on the Following questions: ,
A citizen voluntarily applies for and receives a valid
drivers license from the State of Arkansas.
1, ‘In doing so, has that citizen waived any of his-
Tights that are constitutionally protected? - If ‘so, nn
which rights have been waived? ee Dat. .-
~~ 2. Is that drivers license in substance a
quasi-contract, or evidence of such a contract,
between the licensee and the State of Arkansas?
woBa ee If it is: such a contract,. is the term of. said
“contract the traffic statutes passed by the ot
, Arkansas Legislature? Ce
; in response to your ‘first question; ‘driving’ ‘on the’ rere
-highways of this state: is a privilege. © See generally Ark, _
“Stat..Ann..$75-30], et seq. (Repl. 1979). “In choosing “t
xercise ‘that: privilege. a citizen of the’ “State has not
waived: any. of his. onstitutionally.. protected. rights.
tn response. "to your second - and third. ‘questions; a.”
drivers ‘license is not a quasi-contract or evidence of ‘stich’ *
“a contract between the licensee and the State of. Arkansas, 7
2: cbut rather.a ‘tangible- indication that the driving privilege
"has been extended. to that citizen. -It/also serves the ae
-. s:purpose of a checkpoint to ensure that.a certain level of ©.
proficiency: in handling an automobile is. possessed by” that
‘citizen prior to the operation ofthe vehicle on public’.
“roads which would place’ in jeapordy the’ lives and property
“of -other individuals. eed
} The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was
, prepared by Assistant Attorney General Kay J. Jackson
| Demailly. :
Sincerely, lcm
i
f
;
i
STEVE CLARK
* Attorney General
: SC/KD/pw
se