86-126
Does the enclosed ordinance, which sets up some administrative boards, usurp any authority of the county judge? Q2) Does the next ordinance take away any of the judge's authority to auction surplus property of the county? Q3) Is a sitting commissioner of a fire improvement district required to res
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 86-126
two t#pg-l2b
May 23, 1986
ee
Honorable Del Roberson
- Saline County Judge
“Saline County Courthouse
Benton, AR 72015 ‘-
Dear Judge Roberson:
This is in response to your opinion request wherein you
posed the following questions:
le.
-DOES THE ENCLOSED ORDINANCE (ATTACHMENT
#1) CREATING “ADMINISTRATIVE BOARDS
UNLAWFULLY USURP ANY AUTHORITY OF THE
COUNTY JUDGE? .
No. Since the ordinance does not grant such boards any
authority whatsoever, it cannot usurp any authority vested
in the county judge. >:
2.
DOES THE ENCLOSED ORDINANCE (ATTACHMENT
#2) USURP ANY OF THE COUNTY JDUGE'S
AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE WHAT PROPERTY IS
-- "SURPLUS" SO THAT IT MAY BE SOLD BY
“ PUBLIC AUCTION, an
No. Of course, the quorum court cannot adopt and
enforce an ordinance which usurps the authority granted the
county judge by the legislature. Ark. Stat. Ann. §17-322
grants the county judge sole authority to determine what
property is "surplus" so that it may be sold at public
auction as follows:
Any personal property owned by a county
may, if determined by the county judge
to be surplus, be sold at public auction
to the highest bidder. Notice of the
public auction shall be published at
least once a week for two [2]
consecutive weeks in a newspaper having
general circulation in the county. The
notice shall specify the description of
the property to be sold and the time and
place of the public auction.
Although the enclosed ordinance (Attachment - #2)
prescribes a procedure whereby other county boards and
departments may claim a need for such property, it does not
encroach upon the county “judge's exclusive authority to
determine what property is surplus to be ‘hsld at public
auction.
3.
IS A SITTING COMMISSIONER OF A_ FIRE
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT REQUIRED TO RESIGN
IF ANNEXATION CAUSES HIS RESIDENCE TO BE
. REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT?
Unfortunately, the Protection District Act, Ark. Stat.
Ann. §20-901 et. seq. provides no express guidance on this
question. Ark. Stat. Ann. §20-903 (Repl. 1968) does not
require original commissioners to be resident property..
holders. However, §20-903 does require successive
appointees for commissioner to be "resident property
holders" as follows:
In case of a vacancy . . . the county
court shall appoint some resident
property owner as his successor...
It appears the commissioner you referred to may retain
his office until his term expires because presumably he was
qualified upon assuming his office and nothing in the Act
expressly disqualifies him from that office.
4.
CAN A COUNTY APPROPRIATE MONEY TO BE
SPENT ON AN ADVERSTISING CAMPAIGN’ TO
RAISE ITS SLAES TAX?
No. The promotion of one side of an issue in a county
election is not a "county purpose" or a “public purpose" for
which the county is authorized to make appropriations to
support. Art. 7, $28 of the Constitution of the State of
Arkansas. See also Johnson v. Donham, 191 Ark. 193, 84
S.W.2d 374.
The Attorney General is authorized to render formal
opinions to officers and departments of the State Government
only. Necessarily, therefore, the foregoing is not to be
considered a formal opinion of the Attorney General, but is
an informal and unofficial expression of view given with the
desire to be helpful to you.
“e Sincerely,
STEVE CLARK
Attorney General
BY:
DAVID S. MITCHELL
Assistant Attorney General
SC/DSM/1jm