86-207
Physician supervision of lay midwives. Has the Arkansas State Boar d of Health exceeded its authority in the promulgation of rules and regu lations requiring specific physician supervision of lay midwives? No. 17-85-102
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 86-207
STEVE CLARK
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
201 EAST MARKHAM STREET
HERITAGE WEST BUILDING
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201
Opinion No~ 86~207
February 3, 1987
Ben N. Saltzman, M.D., Director
Arkansas Department of Health
4815 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Dear Dr. Saltzman:
(501) 371-2007
This is in response to your request for an opinion
concerning the following question:
Has the Arkansas State Board of Health exceeded its
authority in the promulgation of rules and regulations
requiring physician supervision of lay midwives?
The Arkansas State Board of Health, pursuant to Ark. Stat.
Ann. § 72-2209, is authorized and directed to adopt
regulations governing the qualifications for licensure of
lay midwives and the practice of lay midwifery. The Board's
authority is limited by Ark. Stat. Ann. §72-2208 to those
counties in Arkansas having 32.5% or more of their
population below the poverty l evel as determined by the 1980
decennial census of the United States Bureau of Census.
Ark. Stat. Ann. §72-2208 also provides that the practice of
lay midwifery be under the supervision of a physician
licensed under the Arkansas Medical Practices Act, who has
obstetrical privileges in a hospital in this State.
Pursuant to its authority the Arkansas State Board of Health
has developed and adopted rules and regulations governing
lay midwifery. Within those rules is embodied a prov is ion
that a lay midwife have an agreement with a consulting
physician and also that a lay midwife make provisions for a
physician within a fifty mile radius of her or his practice
who has pri vi leg es at a local hospital in the event of a
need for emergency medical services. Ben N. Saltzman, Director
February 3, 1987
Page 2
It would appear that the power given to the Board at Ark.
Stat. Ann. §72-2209 to promulgate rules and regulations
governing the practice of midwifery would extend to the area
of assuring that sufficient physician backup is available at
all times. This would entail not only consideration of an
ongoing agreement to assure that the midwife had an
agreement with a physician with whom he or she could consult
on a routine basis, but also to cover the possibility that
an emergency might arise which would lrequire immediate
emergency support. Therefore, the answer! to your question
would be that the Board has not exceeded its authority in
the adopt i on o £ Se c t ions 2 0 2 , 2 0 3 , 2 0 4 ,. 2 0 8 , 3 O 1. O 1 5 . ,
302.0l 6., 302.02 2., 401, 401.01 L and 2., 401.03 7.,
401.05 2.' 404, 405, 406, 406.01.' 406.02.' 406.03.' 500,
600 and other miscellaneous sections of the rules dealing
with the subject of physician supervision.
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared
by Chief Deputy Attorney General Dan Kennett.
JSC:GAH:jk