86-213
Hot checks violations. 1. If a hot check is written within the city limits of Sheridan, does the fine go into the city treasury or the county treasury? 2. Should the hot check warrants for violations within the city limits be handled by the city police and the hot check warrants for violations o
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 86-213
STATE OF ARKANSAS:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
201 EAST MARKHAM STREET
ATTORNEY GENERAL ; : LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201
Opinion No. 86+213
February 2, 1986
The Honorable Joe Kelly Hardin .
Prosecuting Attorney ‘
P. 0. Box 507
Benton, Arkansas
Dear Prosecutor Hardin:
You have requested an opinion from this Office concerning
Ark. Stat. Ann. § 22-719 as it relates to hot check
violations. You pose the following questions:
l. If a hot check is written within the city limits of
Sheridan, does the fine go into the city treasury
or the county treasury?
2. Should the hot check warrants for violations within
the city limits be handled by the city police and
the hot check warrants for violations outside the
city limits be handled by the county?
3. Is it legal for the county to handle all hot check
violations, even those occurring within the city.
limits?
Ark. Stat. Ann. § 22-719 provides:
Sums collected for violations of city ordinances and
state laws kept separate--Payment of funds to city and
county treasuries.-- The municipal court clerk shail
keep two (2) separate accounts of all fines, penalties,
forfeitures, fees and costs received by him for any of
the officers of the city, township or county, as in this
Act provided. The first class shall embrace ail sums
collected in the municipal court in all civil cases and
criminal cases arising out of violations of the city
ordinances and cases arising out of violation of state
laws, committed within the corporate limits of the city
(501) 371-2007
a
-
The Honorable Joe Kehkly Hardin
February 2; 1987
Page 2
where the court sits, where the arresting officer was a.
policeman or other officer of the city or where the
_ arresting officer was a state policeman. The second
class shall embrace all cases arising out of violation
of any of the laws of the state where the arresting
officer was not a policeman or other officer of the
municipality, or where the offense was.committed outside
the corporate limits of the city and the arrest was made
by a state policeman, and in all other|criminal
proceedings not specifically enumerated in this
section. The municipal court shall, after deducting the
fees and costs due the sheriff and constables, pay. into
the city treasury all sums arising from the first class
-of accounts, and he shall pay all.sums ‘rising out of
said second class accounts into the county treasury,
settlement.between the municipal court clerk and the
county clerk being had for that purpose each year .-
between the fifth and- fifteenth days of January of the
succeeding year.
We construe this section to mean that the city. ‘treasury is
to receive the fines collected in municipal court if the
arresting officer was a city policeman, city official or a
state policeman, and the offense was committed within -the
city limits.: In cases where the arresting officer is not a-
city policeman or where the violation was committed outside
the city limits” and the arresting officer was a state
policeman, the county receives the fine. The county
receives the fine in all other proceedings not specifically
mentioned in this section.
If a hot check is written within the City of Sheridan the
fine money goes into the city treasury if the arrest was
made by a city policeman or a state policeman. If the
arrest was made by a-deputy sheriff the fine money is to be
paid into the county treasury.
Both the city police and the sheriff's office have
jurisdiction over crimes committed within the city. The
jurisdiction of the sheriff's office encompasses the entire
county including municipalities. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 22-703.
The foregoing opinion, which JI hereby approve, was prepared
by Assistant Attorney General Arnold M. Jochums.
Sincgrely,
Attorhey General
JSC:AMJ: ik 4