85-033
Is the Pollution Control and Ecology Commission subject to the Administrative Procedures Act? 25-15-210 et seq. Yes definitely
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-033
STEVE CLARK
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
“OPINION NO,. 85-33
(501) 371.2607
February 4 +985 <A
The Honorable John W. Parkerson
State Representative
State Capitol
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 HAND DELIVERED
Dear Representative Parkerson:
You have requested an opinion from our Office about the following
question:
Is the Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
subject in whole or in part to the Administrative Procedure Act
(Ark. Stat. Ann. §5-701 to 5-715.3) (1976 & Supp. 1983)).
The answer to your question requires an interpretation of Ark.
Stat. Ann. §5-701(a)} (Supp. 1983), and its predecessor, with respect
to the Pollution Control Commission and the subsequent creation of the
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology.
By Act 434 of 1967 an exemption to the Administrative Procedure
Act was granted to the Arkansas Pollution Control Commission. In
1971, Act 38, §8 created the Department of Pollution Control and
Ecology and transferred the “functions, powers and duties" of the
Pollution Control Commission "by a type 4 transfer" to this Depart-
ment. Ark. Stat. Ann. §5-908 (1976).
A "type 4" transfer is described in Ark. Stat. Ann. §5-902(4)
(1976) and it is helpful to examine the pertinent provisions of this
statute: .
Under this Act, a type 4 transfer means the transferring of all or
part of an existing department, institution, or other agency to a
principal department established by this Act. When all or part of
any department, institution, or other agency is transferred to a
principal department under a type 4 transfer, the board or com-
mission or other governing body of the transferred department,
institution, or other agency is retained and shall continue to
exercise its statutory authority, powers, duties and functions,
except that any rules, regulations, and standards issued by such
boards, commission or other governing body shall be subject to
written. approval by the Governor. (Emphasis Added.)
The "ynorable John W. Parkerson ~
February 11, 1985
Page 2
Accordingly, when the Commission was transferred to the newly
created Department of Pollution Control and Ecology in 1971, it re-
tained its statutory exemption to the Administrative Procedure Act.
The fact that this exemption did not transfer to the Department is
clear from the language of §5-701 that "'Agency’ means each board,
commission, department, officer, or other authority of the government
of the State of Arkansas, whether or not within or subject to review
by another agency. ..." (Emphasis Added). Furthermore, an
analogous situation was examined by the Arkansas Supreme Court in
Arkansas Dept. of Labor v. Amercian Employment Agency, 257 Ark.
509, 517 S.W.2d 949 (1975) in which that Department contended that
§5-701 exempted it from the Administrative Procedure Act. The re-
sponse by the Court:
It is in error. The Employment Security Division of the Arkansas
Department of Labor is specifically exempted, by neither the
Department of Labor nor the Commissioner of Labor is. We can
neither extend the exemption to them, nor can we find any Legis-
lative intent to extend the exemption beyond the agencies care-
fully and specifically enumerated.
Id. at 257 Ark. 513-14, 517 $.W.2d 951.
It is also important to note that the Legislature amended §5-701 in
1979 by Act 324, §15, but retained the language exempting the Pollu-
tion Control Commission and did not mention the Department of Pollu-
tion Control and Ecology.
Accordingly, it is the opinion of this Office that the Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology is wholly subject to the Administrative
Procedure Act.
Our research indicates that various regulations currently followed
by the Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, i.e.
Regulation 8, closely parallel the Administrative Procedure Act pro-
viding for notice to parties, etc.
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by
Chief Deputy Attorney General Rodney Parham.
Yours ,truly,
STEVE CLARK
Attorney General
' §C:RP:ble