86-260
Should a municipal judge be elected on a county wide basis after the adoption of a Federal Decennial Census? RESPONSE: See Act 26 of 1965.
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 86-260
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL
OPINION NO. 86-260
April 17, 1986
Honorable Albert Tom Collier
State Representative
2713 Ivy
Newport, AR 72112
Dear Representative Collier:
This is in response to your inquiry wherein you you
submitted the following:
The first Federal Decennial Census after the adoption of
Act 26 of 1965 (attached) showed Jackson County with a
population of 20,452; the 1980 Census, however, puts
Jackson County population at 21,646, so should municipal
judges in Jackson County now be elected on a county-wide
basis?
Your letter states that Jackson County is now within the
designated population range, consequently, municipal judges
would now be elected county-wide persuant to Act 26.
The foregoing opinion which I hereby approve’ was
prepared by Chief Deputy Attorney General, Rodney Parham.
Pos
Attorney General
JSC:1ldc.
cc: John Fincher
;
oy