86-363
1. The legality of the action by a Civil Service Commission disciplining an assistant police chief by reducing him in rank to captain; 2. Whether the pr omotion rights of current lieutenants in subject police department are infrin ged in that the demoted police chief has never taken the examinati
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 86-363
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
201 EAST MARKHAM STREET 7 (¢%
HERITAGE WEST BUILDING =
STEVE CLARK < . 501) 371-20
ATTORNEY GENERAL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 / FB — 00) 371-2007
Opinion No. 86-363
January 28, 1987
The Honorable Max Howell
Senator, 26th District ;
211 Spring Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Dear Senator Howell:
This is in response to your letter requesting an opinion
regarding:
1) The legality of the action by a Civil Service
Commission disciplining an assistant police chief by
reducing him in rank to captain;
2) Whether the promotion rights of current lieutenants
in subject police department are infringed in that the
demoted police chief has never taken the examination for
rank of captain, and
3) The authority to promote as distinguished from the
authority to demote.
Ark. Stat. Ann. §19-1603 provides that the Board of Civil
Service Commissioners shall prescribe and enforce rules and
regulations governing police departments. That statute
provides at "11"' for the Commission to prescribe a method
for "reduction in rank or compensation."' Included in these
rules is a provision that in the event an employee is
discharged or reduced in rank that such employee shall have
the right within ten days from the date of notice of
reduction in rank to apply in writing for a hearing. Thus,
a Civil Service Commission has the authority to discipline
police department employees by reducing them in rank.
The Honorable Max Howell
January 28, 1987
Page 2
Since it is assumed that the individual was qualified as
Assistant Police Chief it must also be assumed that the’
individual was qualified for the lesser rank of captain.
The various aspects of promotion and reduction in rank or
compensation are discussed in Ark. Stat. Ann.. §19-1603, a
copy of which is attached for your convenience. This —
provision provides for both promotion and demotion. The
. authority granted to an employing entity to make and execute
personnel decisions is generally comprehensive, as is that
granted to a Civil Service Commission in this statutory
scheme. The Commission, in prescribing suth rules for |
‘promotion must follow the statutory language and, of course,
it should not take action violating the federally given
civil | rights of. employee. Thus, the answer to your second
question is probably "no". The above discussion was also
intended to address your third question.
The foregoing opinion, which L hereby approve, was prepared
by Special Assistant Attorney General George A. Harper.
. Sincerely,
STEV& JCLARK oe
Attorney General
JSC: GAH: ble
Att.