85-059
Who is eligible to vote in a school district election? Are polling sites for general elections the same as those for school district elections? Are the ballots cast by the Caraway residents invalid? 6-14-108 Persons eligible to vote in general election are qualified to vote in school d
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-059
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK 5 “
ATTORNEY GENERAL (501) 371-2007
OPINION NO. 85-59
February 21, 1985
Mr. Devane Baldridge
Superintendent of Schools
P.O. Box N
Monette, AR 72447
Dear Superintendent Baldridge:
This is in response to your Letter of November 15, 1985,
requesting an opinion on the following questions:
"Who is eligible to vote in a school district elec-
tion?"
"are polling sites for general elections the same as
those for school district elections?"
"are the ballots cast by the Caraway residents invalid?"
Arkansas law provides that persons who are qualified to vote
in a general election are also eligible to vote in the
school district in which they reside, Ark. Stat. Ann. §80-
305. The law further provides that for the purposes of
school elections only, the school district may be designated
as a political township, Ark. Stat. Ann. §80-304.
It is the duty of the County Board of Election Commissioners,
however, to designate polling places for each school district,
Ark. Stat. Ann. §80-318. The voting precincts used in
general elections would not necessarily be the same voting
a
precincts used in the school election.
If the Board of Blection Commissioners failed to designate
polling places for thé Caraway residents, it cannot be said
that they voted in the wrong precinct, so their votes are
still valid.
In Christensen, et al v. Felton, et al, 226 Ark. 985, 295
SW. 2d 361 (1956), the Arkansas Supreme Court held that
i
eS
a
Mr. Devane Baldridge
February 21, 1985
Page 2
voting requirements which are mandatory before the election
becomes directory after the elections, so that voters other-
wise qualified will not be disfranchised by the failure of
the Election Commissioners to perform certain duties.
Christenson _has—been—reaEfirmed—in_two_more recent cases as
Fn AERP TTARR, AMIR
well: Adams, et al v. Dixie School District No. 7, et al,
264 Ark. 178, 570 S.W.2d 603 (1978} and Goodall, et al v. T.
ee eee
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared
by Assistant Attorney General, Rick D. Hogan.
Sincerely,
pr Madr
STE LARK
Attornty General
jsc:RH:dc