85-070
Juvenile and Youthful offenders. Can the City of Stuttgart set up a program whereby juveniles and youthful offenders could be placed in a work program rather than being fined? Yes. The Alternate Service Act. 16-93-501 et seq. 9-28-201 9-27-432
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-070
STATE OF ARKANSAS
~— —— OFFICE-OF-FHE ATTORNEY GENERAL __...
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007 |
ATTORNEY GENERAL March 5, 1985
OPINION NO. 85-70
The Honorable J.W. Green, Jr.
Prosecuting Attorney
602 South College
Stuttgart, Arkansas - 72160
Dear Mr. Green:
This office has received your request for an opinion as
to whether Stuttgart could set up a program whereby juveniles
and youthful offenders could be placed in a work program
rather than being fined. Research has disclosed nothing
which would specifically prohibit Stuttgart from so doing;
rather, the statutes encourage local participation of this
nature, and authorize such a disposition as an alternative
to a fine. ,
The Alternative Service Act (formerly Youthful Offender
Alternative Service Act), codified at Ark. Stat. Ann. §43-
2339 et. seq. (Repl. 1977 & Supp. 1983) encourages the
development of local programs by specifically allowing the
trial judge to sentence certain youthful offenders to al-~
ternative service programs. See Ark. Stat. Ann. §43-2342(b)
(Supp. 1983). An “Alterntaive Service Program" is defined
as
a) Any program providing corrective and
preventive guidance designed to rehabilitate
eligible offenders. . . which is certified by
the Commission on Community Based Rehabilitation
- . . - [The] program may operate in relation
to private and public social institutions, or-
ganizations. . . and local communities located
throughout the State including, but not Limited
to the following
1) Employment Resources. ..
2) Educational Resources. ..
3) Social Welfare Services. ..
4) The law enforcement system
5) Other relevant community organiza-
ry
wet
groups, recreational and social or-
Ganizations, religious and self. help
«
Honorable J. W. Green, Jr.
March 5, 1985
Page 2
Le _——_
groups, and others devoted to political
or social action. (emphasis added).
Thus, under this Act, Stuttgart could clearly set up some
type of local work program as an alternative to a fine or
term or imprisonment, for juveniles and youthful offenders.
Two things should be remembered, however, in relation to
this Act. One, any local program would have to be certified
by the Commission on Community Based Rehabilitation. See
Ark. Stat. Ann. §§43-2340(a) and 43-2341(a) (Supp. 1983).
And two, only "eligible offenders" could be required to
participate in such a program. "Eligible offender” is
defined in Ark. Stat. Ann. §43-2340(f) (Supp. 1983) as any
person who has been convicted of a felony offense other than
a capital felony, first or second degree murder, first
degree rape or kidnapping or aggravated robbery, and who has
never been previously convicted of a felony. A person under
age twenty-six can be an "eligible offender" even though he
has been convicted of a previous felony if it was nota
capital felony, first or second degree murder, first degree
rape or kidnapping or aggravated robbery.
The Act which established Youth Services as a division
of the Department of Human Services [Ark. Stat. Ann. §45-501
et seq (Repl. 1977)] also explicitly encourages the develop-
| ment of local programs. Ark. Stat. Ann. §45-504 (Repl.
1977) provides that the Youth Services Board "shall provide
direction for the development of community based alterna~
tives to the incarceration of youth up to the age of 18
years." Ark. Stat. Ann. §45-506 (Repl. 1977) provides that
the Division of Youth Services is to serve as a liason
between the State and local communities and is to provide
technical assistance and guidance to local communities in
the establishment and maintenance of programs and projects
to combat juvenile delinquency. Clearly under this Act
Stuttgart could work with Youth Services to develop a
community based program for young persons,
And finally, if the offender is tried in juvenile
court under, the Juvenile Code of 1975, and is found to be
delinquent,” Ark. Stat. Ann. §45-436 (Supp. 1983) sets out
1
“ Juvenile delinquent is a person under 18, who has
commmitted an act other than a traffic offense which, if
such act had.been committed by an adult, would subject such
adult to prosecution for a felony or misdemeanor, or has
committed an offense applicable only to a juvenile. Ark.
Stat. Ann. §45-403 (Supp. 1983).
Honorable J. W. Green, Jr. ee oe. _
March 5, 1985
Page 3
the various permissible,.dispositions the juvenile judge may
Make. One such disposition is that the juvenile participate
in a court approved public service not to exceed 50 hours.
See §43~436 (3) (b) (ix).
In summary, it is clear that Stuttgart may set up a
community based program for juveniles and youthful offenders
provided the program complies with the various statutory
provisions set forth herein. Under the Juvenile Code, the
Alternative Service Act and the Youth Services Act the trial
judge (either juvenile or circuit) could require juvenile
delinquents and youthful offenders to participate in this
local work program or public service project as an alternative
to a fine or other type of punishment.
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was
prepared by Assistant Attorney General Marci L. Talbot.
Respegtfully submitted,
Attorney General
SC:MT: jh