85-076
Can the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, acting pursuant to section 22-142 temporarily assign a Circuit judge from another district to hold court in the county of a disabled judge? No. 16-10-101 Ark const. art. 7 22 and Ark const Art. 7 sec. 21. 16-14-104
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-076
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL March 11, 1985
OPINION NO. 85-76
Honorable Christopher Thomas
Executive Secretary
Judicial Department
Justice Building
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Dear Mr. Thomas:
By letter of February 6, 1985, you requested an opinion
on the following issue:
Assume that the Circuit Judge of a judicial
district, which has only one Circuit Judge, is
temporarily unable to perform the duties of the
office, due to severe illness, and the practicing
attorneys of the county duly elect one of their
number as a “Special Judge" in accordance with
Article 7, Section 21 of the Arkansas Constitu-
tion of 1874, and Rule 17 of the Uniform Rules
for Circuit, Chancery and Probate Courts. In
an effort to assist such "Special Judge", may
the Chief Justice, acting pursuant to Section
22~142 of the Arkansas Statutes Annotated,
temporarily assign a Circuit Judge from another
district to hold court in the county of the
disabled judge? And, in light of Act 135 of
1961 (codified as Sections 22-342 through 346
of the Arkansas Statutes Annotated), may the
"Special Judge” and the assigned Circuit Judge
from the other district hold court in the county
simultaneously?
In response to your first question, whether the Chief
Justice, acting pursuant to Section 22-142 of the Arkansas
Statutes Annotated, may temporarily assign a Circuit Judge
from another district to hold court in the county of the
disabled judge, the answer is no. In Burris v. Britt, 281
Ark. 225, 663 S.W.2d 715 (1984), the Arkansas Supreme Court
noted that: .
- . . the constitution specifically provides two
modes for replacing the regular circuit judge
Honorable Christopher Thomas
March ll, 1985
Page 2 ‘
when that judge recuses from the trial of a case.
See Ark. Const. Art. 7, §§21 and 22. Since the
modes are expressly set out they are exclusive
of all other methods of temporarily replacing
a circuit judge and a statute providing a
different method is unconstitutional.
(citation omitted).
Burris at 227. In the Burris case, the regular circuit judge
had recused himself and the Chief Justice had assigned a
retired circuit judge to hear the case as a circuit judge on
recall.
It would apparently make no difference that the judge
outlined in your facts is unable to perform his duties due
to illness as opposed to having recused himself as in the
Burris case. The Arkansas Supreme Court found that the only
two methods for replacing the regular circuit judge were
those methods outlined in Ark. Const. Art. 7, §§21 and 22
and that a statute providing a different method is unconsti-
tutional.
Since the local attorneys have elected a "Special
Judge" pursuant to the authority of Art. 7, §21, of the
Arkansas Constitution, that "Special Judge" has the authority
to enter into an exchange agreement pursuant to Art. 7, §22
and Ark. Stat. Ann. §22-342 through §22-346 (Repl. 1977 and
Supp. 1983), the statutory provisions which implement Art.
7, §22. Thus, it would appear that the temporary assignment
of a judge under the circumstances you outline would encroach .
upon the exclusive methods of temporarily replacing a circuit
judge as noted by the Arkansas Supreme Court in Burris v.
Britt, supra.
In light of the fact that I have answered your first
question in the negative, it is not necessary to reach the
second question you raised regarding whether the "Special
Judge" and the assigned Circuit Judge from another district
may hold court in the county simultaneously.
This opinion which I hereby approve, was prepared by
Assistant Attorney General Jack Gillean.
Sincerdl
“ , y,
Attorney General