85-005
The county levied the school, municipal and county taxes at its regular meeting in November, but omitted a part of the city millage. Actually, this millage was never properly adopted by the city. Is the municipal millage zero? Or does the old millage carry over from last year? Can the Quorum Co
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-005
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL
January 3, 1985
OPINION NO. 85-5
The Honorable David Clinger
Prosecuting Attorney
P. 0. Box 568
Bentonville, Arkansas 72712
Dear Mr. Clinger:
This is in response to the inquiry of your Deputy David A. Stewart
by which he submitted the following:
On November 16, 1984, the Carroll County Quorum Court passed
an ordinance approving and levying the County, Municipal and
School taxes for the year 1984. This was in accordance with
Ark. Stat. Ann. Section 17~4002(2). The Ordinance passed a
millage rate for the City of Eureka Springs, Arkansas, at
2.5 mills (apparently a .3 mill assessment for the Firemen'a
Relief and Pension Fund was omitted). However, it has come
to our attention that the City of Eureka Springs had, in fact,
not passed their ordinance approving the millage at the rate
passed by the County on November 16.
1. Was the Carroll County Ordinance passed on November 16,
1984, effective as to the 2.5 millage rate assessed to the
City of Eureka Springs, Arkansas?
2. If the answer to question number 1 is no, does the 1.6
millage rate previously assessed in 1983 to the City of
Eureka Springs, Arkansas carry over to the year 1984.
3. If the answer to question number 2 is no, does the City of
Eureka Springs, Arkansas, now have a city tax of zero?
4, If the City of Eureka Springs, Arkansas, properly certifies
its November 20, 1984, Ordinance to the County of 2.8 mills,
is the Carroll County Quorum Court empowered by law to amend
its November 16, 1984, Ordinance to conform to the 2.8 mill
assessment for the City of Eureka Springs, Arkansas?
As to the first question, Ark. Stat. Ann. §17-4002(2) requires the Quorum
Court to levy the County, Municipal and School taxes at its regular meeting
in November of each year. Ark, Stat. Ann. §19-4501 requires the City
Council on or before the time fixed by law for levying County taxes to
certify to the County Clerk the rate of taxation levied by the Municipality.
Honorable David Clinger
January 3, 1985
Page 2
It is my understanding that November 16, 1984 was the date of the
regular November meeting of the Quorum Court. Since the City Council
had not approved the Municipal millage as of this date the attempted
levy of the Municipal millage was invalid.
The answer to question 2 is "no" as the millage is an annual levy. Thus,
the City of Eureka Springs now has a city tax of zero.
As to the fourth question, the answer is "no" as our Supreme Court
has held that where a levying court convened on the wrong day the
levy is void. Britt v. Harper, 132 Ark. 193, 200 S.W. 787.
Berger v. Lutterloh, 69 Ark, 576, Hilliard v. Bunker 68 Ark. 340.
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by
Chief Deputy Attorney General Rodney Parham,
SC:RP:1m