85-103
Deferred Compensation Plan. This opinion concerns the rights of state employees in the event an inusurance company which sells the state annuity contracts goes into bankruptcy or rehabilitation. The employees have a limit ed right under 21-5-510 to the amounts not yet expended by the state to
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-103
STATE OF ARKANSAS
——.-- —_ OFFIGE-OF THE-ATTORNEY-GENERAL=— => —
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL ,
OPINION NO. 85-103
April 11, 1985
Mr. Mahlon A. Martin
Director
Department of Finance and Administration
P.O. Box 3278
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203
Dear Mr. Martin: ©
This is in response to your inquiry regarding the Deferred Compensation
Plan as administered by the State Employees' Insurance Advisory Committee
pursuant to Act 669 of 1975 as amended by Act 937 of 1977.
In the event a company from which the State of Arkansas has purchased an
annuity contract goes bankrupt, and into liquidation or rehabilitation, those
state employees whose deferred income was used for that annuity purchase would
have a limited recourse against the State as provided in Ark. Stat. Ann, § 12-1624
(Repl. 1983) for an amount limited to that amount of the individuals deferred
income that has not been expended by the state in the purchase of the annuity
contract in question. Any such claim would be pursued through the State Claims
Commission.
For that amount not includible in the above claim the recourse of the
state employee/participant would depend. upon whether the insurance company in
question will be undergoing liquidation or rehabilitation.
Under liquidation, the state employee's/annuity participant's recourse
would be provided for in the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act, Ark. Stat.
Ann. § 66-4821 et seq (Repl. 1983) which determines the priority of distri-
bution of the general assets of an insurance company which is being liquidat-
ed. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 66-4827(3) (Repl. 1983) considers a claim under an
annuity policy, whether for proceeds or investment value, as a "Class 3"
priority. These claims are subordinate to classes one and two.
In the event a company from which the State cf Arkansas has purchased an
annuity contract goes bankrupt, and into rehabilitation, the state employee's/
participant's claim: would be subject to a rehabilitation order issued by the
circuit court. Any objections to a proposed rehabilitation plan by a state
-——enptoyee/participant would be brought forth in the circuit court hearing
from which the rehabilitation order ig issued.
Regarding your question concarning the liability of the State Employee
Tnsurance Advisory Committee, a claimant is unable to maintain an action
against a member of the Committee if the claimant is actually attempting
to sue the State of Arkansas because Act 5, § 20, of the Arkansas Consti-
tution provides that the State "shall never be made a defendant in any
of her courts."
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Assistant
Attorney General Kent Joiliff.
SC/KI/pt