85-107
If School District "A" has a higher millage rate than School District "B" and School District "A" is found to fail the minimum standards for accreditation and is annexed to School District "B," and then a new millage rate of the combined schools higher than School District "B" had at the time of the
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-107
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENFRGEON NO. 85~107
April 18, 1985
Honorable Alvin Dwiggins
Senator, District 21
Capitol Mall
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear: Senator Dwiggins:
This is in response to your opinion request wherein you
posed the following inquiry:
If School District "A" has a higher millage rate than
School District "B" and School District "A" is found to
fail the minimum standards for accreditation and is
annexed to School District "B", and then a new millage
rate of the combined schools higher than School District
"B" had at the time of annexation is proposed at the
next school election and fails, what would be the
millage rate for the residents of former School District
vA" ?
Dispositive of your inquiry is Article 14, §3 of the Arkansas
Constitution as amended by Amendments Nos. 11 and 40. This
Constitutional provision provides in pertinent part as
follows:
If a majority of the qualified voters in said school
district voting in the annual school election shall
approve the rate of tax so proposed by the Board of
Directors, then the tax at the rate so approved shall
be collected as provided by law. In the event a
majority of said qualified electors voting in said
annual school election shall disapprove the proposed
rate of tax, then the tax shall be collected at the
rate approved in the last preceding annual school
election. _
In response to your inquiry then, it is the opinion of this
Office that the millage rate for the residents of former
School District "A" would be the rate of millage last
approved in that school district prior to annexation.
4
Honorable Alvin Dwiggins
Apral le, 1985
Page 2
The forecoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared
by Assistant Attorney General C. Randy McNair, Iil.
Sincerely,
G-.*_
STEV: R
Attorney General
JSC:CRM:jk