22 CAR § 111-502. Need for commissioning

(a)(1) Today’s buildings and our expectations in their performance are becoming increasingly sophisticated. (2) Like any sophisticated machine, a building: (A) Should be set up and balanced to operate properly; and (B) May require a periodic tune-up to remain operating at peak efficiency. (3) Departments are encouraged to consider the concept of total building commissioning on new construction projects and major renovations. (4) Commissioning, when applied from the beginning of the design process and continuing through the warranty period, can result in projects that: (A) Cost less to construct; (B) Start up with fewer problems; and (C) Have proper documentation for operations and maintenance. (5) In many cases, the cost of the commissioning process is offset by a reduction in: (A) Construction cost; (B) Change orders; and (C) Startup problems. (b)(1) With utility cost and maintenance cost escalating at rates above the average rates of growth in the state’s economy, reductions in operations and maintenance cost are an essential part of a department’s obligations to being a good steward of public funds. (2) Commissioning can be a vital part of the process of controlling these costs within an acceptable limit. (3) In many instances, including existing buildings, the cost of the commissioning process can often be returned in two (2) years or less with the reduction in energy cost alone. (c)(1) When departments elect to pursue green building design certifications such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Globes, or similar certifications, these processes usually have a prerequisite requirement to perform fundamental commissions and offer additional points toward certification for additional or total commissioning. (2) These programs often require the commissioning for points to be conducted by an independent third-party firm.