24 CAR § 10-1018
24 CAR § 10-1018. Manifest injustice
Length: 310 wordsOfficial source
(a) The Board of Trustees of the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System may waive or modify the impact of a rule, provision, or law applicable to the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System that does not violate a federal law or jeopardize the tax qualified status of the system in order to prevent a manifest injustice to:
(1) A member;
(2) A benefit participant;
(3) A covered employer; or
(4) The system.
(b)(1) The process of declaring a manifest injustice is a rare and extraordinary remedy that shall not be used as a routine method of addressing:
(A) Error;
(B) Oversight; or
(C) Simple mistake.
(2) As an extraordinary remedy, manifest injustice shall be cautiously and carefully used to:
(A) Prevent unfairness;
(B) Preserve the integrity of the system; and
(C) Avoid or correct unduly harsh or unconscionable outcomes.
(c) In determining whether or not a manifest injustice exists, the system may consider:
(1) The degree of fault of the system, benefit participant, or employer;
(2) An ambiguity in the interpretation of the circumstances, rule, or law;
(3) The cost to the system of correcting the error that is far outweighed by the benefit afforded to the system, benefit participant, or employer;
(4) Whether or not an expedited decision is in the public interest;
(5) The fundamental fairness of a remedy in a particular situation; and
(6) Whether or not the status quo would result in an unconscionable outcome.
(d)(1) The manifest injustice process shall not be used to address a change, omission, or error in the records of the system that may be corrected within the look-back period.
(2) The manifest injustice process may be used to correct a change, omission, or error in the records of the system discovered after the look-back period if the board determines that the time limitation imposed by the look-back period would cause a manifest injustice.