AZ Regulatory Bulletin 2001-12
AZ Regulatory Bulletin 2001-12: Implementation of Product Regulation Reform
STATE OF ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
JANE DEE HULL
2910 NORTH 44th STREET, SUITE 210
CHARLES R. COHEN
Governor
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018-7256
Director of Insurance
602/912-8456 (phone) 602/912-8452 (fax)
Regulatory Bulletin 2001-12
TO:
Authorized Insurers, Insurance Trade Associations, Rating Organizations,
Rate Service Organizations, Advisory Organizations and Other Interested
Parties
FROM:
Charles R. Cohen
Director of Insurance
DATE:
September 21, 2001
RE:
Implementation of Product Regulation Reform
As discussed in recent editions of the Arizona Department of Insurance (“ADOI”)
newsletter, in my detailed June 21, 2001 memorandum, and at the August 1, 2001
open meeting at the ADOI offices, the ADOI is officially implementing key elements of
its product regulation reform initiative on November 1, 2001. The purpose of this
bulletin is to discuss related implementation issues.
The regulation of insurance rates and rating rules, policy related forms and advertising
is part of the ADOI’s core consumer protection activities. Certain classes of insurance
consumers are highly dependent upon the ADOI to assure that insurance products are
legally compliant, appropriate and fair. At the same time, the ADOI recognizes that
fostering a competitive marketplace for insurance products is highly beneficial to
insurance consumers. The goal of this initiative is to achieve efficiency improvements
that both promote competition among insurers and enhance regulatory protection for
those consumers that rely upon it.
Generally, this initiative streamlines the ADOI’s regulation of insurance products. We
have been guided by the Speed to Market initiative of the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners, in particular the guidelines developed by the Improvements
to State Based Systems Working Group (IS3). This bulletin will primarily discuss the
following components of this initiative:
September 21, 2001
Page 2
• Adoption of standardized transmittal forms for rate and form filings
• Adoption of Review Standard Checklists for many kinds of rate and form filings
• Implementation of a process for filing, review and approval or disapproval of rate
and form filings.
• Implementation of the System for Electronic Rate and Form Filing (SERFF)
Also, following public hearings to be held on October 3, 2001, I will issue the following
orders:
• Updating exemptions for certain life and disability forms and certain property and
casualty insurance rates and forms from filing and approval requirements;
• Updating exemptions for certain policies of commercial property and casualty
insurance from cancellation and nonrenewal restrictions; and
• Updating types and lines of insurance permitted to be written by unauthorized
insurers as surplus lines.
The Notices of Hearing in these matters, as well my June 21, 2001 memorandum to
interested parties that includes a detailed description of the basis for the proposed
updates to the exemptions, can be found on the ADOI website: www.state.az.us/id.
While this initiative is fueled by the ADOI’s commitment to increased efficiency in the
regulation of insurance products, the insurance industry must understand that “Speed
to Market” is a two-way street. It is imperative that insurers utilize the standardized
transmittal forms and Review Standard Checklists when making filings if the desired
efficiency is to be achieved. The initiative cannot succeed without the insurance
industry’s commitment to make quality, compliant filings and to respond promptly to the
ADOI’s follow-up inquiries regarding the filings. As described below, the transmittal
forms, checklists and the proposed filing and review process are the key components in
meeting our objectives.
TRANSMITTAL FORMS
In order to facilitate the filing and review process of required rate and policy form filings,
we have adopted standard transmittal forms. There is one transmittal form for property
and casualty filings and two for life and health filings (one for forms, one for
advertising). The property and casualty form is the form adopted by IS3 for use by all
the states and for SERFF filings. The ADOI developed the life and health form to aid in
the submission and review of those filings. However, we anticipate adopting a standard
life and health transmittal form when one is developed by IS3. While the transmittal
forms are already in use, all property and casualty insurers shall be required to submit a
standard transmittal form with all product filings effective November 1, 2001. (Life and
health insurers are not required to submit a transmittal form with SERFF filings;
however, the ADOI requests that a transmittal form accompany all life and health paper
filings effective November 1, 2001.) Product filing submissions that do not include
an appropriate transmission form will be regarded as incomplete and will be
returned without further review. The forms are available at the Phoenix and Tucson
September 21, 2001
Page 3
offices of the ADOI and can be sent to you upon request. The forms are also readily
available on the ADOI website, www.state.az.us/id.
The transmittal forms contain the most basic information necessary for recording the
receipt of the transmission, determining what type of filing the insurer is making and to
whom the filing should be forwarded for review. The elements required for a
submission to be considered “complete” are also identified in the transmittal form. The
forms for both property and casualty and life and health require the company’s name,
address, NAIC #, a contact person and telephone number. The form also includes the
type of insurance and type of filing attached (Policy/Certificate, Disclosure Form, etc.).
An important component of the life and health transmittal forms is the “Company Officer
Certification” section. The ADOI purposefully required that the certification be
completed by an officer of the insurer or health plan so that the responsibility for
attesting to the validity, accuracy and completeness of the transmittal and enclosures
will not be delegated to personnel who cannot be appropriately held accountable for the
attestation. The certification is directly related to the need for high quality filings to
make this initiative successful.
REVIEW STANDARDS CHECKLISTS
The ADOI has developed comprehensive, detailed Review Standards Checklists. Each
checklist sets forth in spreadsheet format a description of legal requirements applicable
to the form filing, the legal authority for each requirement, and, where applicable,
pertinent commentary regarding the requirement. The “Comments” section was
devised to emphasize areas where errors are frequently made in filings or in areas
subject to dispute in the past. The checklists also include, where appropriate, a space
for the filer to identify precisely where in the form the element relating to those
requirements can be found. The checklists were designed to greatly reduce, if not
eliminate, the uncertainty insurers sometimes encountered in identifying the working
requirements for approval of product filings. To that end, the ADOI identified and
considered the unpublished requirements that may have been applied to rate and form
filings in the past. Those requirements have either been eliminated or expressly stated
in the checklists (along with an explanation of the legal basis).
The ADOI has been utilizing the Review Standards Checklists for its own analytical
purposes since June 2001. All insurers shall be required to submit the appropriate
Review Standards Checklists with all product filings effective November 1, 2001 and
are encouraged to begin using them as soon as possible. If the appropriate checklist
does not accompany the submission, it will be regarded as incomplete and will
be returned without further review. The property and casualty product checklists
contain a “Certification” that must be signed by a company officer, similar to the one
found on the life and health transmittal forms. Again, this is an important component to
promote the quality of the filings.
September 21, 2001
Page 4
The importance of the uniform use of the checklists to our ability to expeditiously review
the filings cannot be overemphasized. We firmly believe that once insurers become
comfortable with the checklists, they will greatly simplify the process of preparing
product filings for insurers. The checklists for all major product filings are available at
the Phoenix and Tucson offices of the ADOI and can be sent to you upon request. The
checklists may also be found on the ADOI website: www.state.az.us/id.
STANDARDIZED PROCESS FOR FILING AND REVIEW OF PRODUCT
FILINGS
As of November 1, 2001, the ADOI will implement a standardized process for the filing
and review of product filings, as set forth in the draft rule attached hereto. The process
is applicable to any rate or form submissions and filings that are required under Arizona
Revised Statutes, Title 20, Chapters 2, 4, 5 and 6 to be filed with the ADOI prior to use.
The process is not applicable to health care service organizations. The review process
is divided into two periods: administrative completeness review and substantive review.
Administrative Completeness Review
The information or materials submitted to the ADOI pursuant to this process are initially
considered a “submission.” A submission will generally be the product filing
accompanied by the appropriate transmittal form and review standard checklist. The
submission does not become a “filing” until it is determined or deemed to be
administratively complete. A submission is administratively complete and becomes a
“filing” upon the occurrence of either of two events: (1) the ADOI notifies the filer that
the submission is administratively complete; or (2) 15 calendar days have elapsed since
the submission was received by the ADOI and the ADOI has not notified the filer that
the submission is not administratively complete. To summarize the administrative
completeness period:
• The ADOI shall determine whether a submission is administratively complete within
15 calendar days of receipt of the submission.
• If prior to the conclusion of the administrative completeness review period, the ADOI
determines that the submission is not administratively complete, the ADOI shall so
notify the filer, and shall return the submission to the filer with a statement of
deficiencies. If within 15 calendar days of its receipt of the submission the ADOI
does not notify the filer that the submission is not administratively complete, the
submission is deemed an administratively complete “filing.” Upon a filer’s request to
expedite a particular filing, the ADOI will endeavor to issue a notice of administrative
completeness before the end of the 15 day review period rather than allow the full
“deemer” period to elapse.
• The ADOI’s determination that a submission is not administratively complete does
not constitute an appealable agency action under Title 41.
September 21, 2001
Page 5
Substantive Review
The substantive review is the qualitative evaluation by the ADOI of a “filing” to
determine whether it satisfies all the requirements established by statute, rule, or other
law necessary to approve or decline to disapprove the filing. To summarize the
substantive review period:
• The ADOI shall complete its substantive review within 30 calendar days of the
filing being determined or deemed complete, unless a different time frame is
indicated for a particular type of filing set forth in Table A of the attached draft rule.
• Upon completion of the substantive review, the ADOI shall notify the filer that either:
1) the filing is approved; 2) the filing will be disapproved unless the filer corrects
deficiencies listed in the notice and files additional or corrected information before
the end of the substantive review period or; 3) the filing is disapproved.
• The disapproval of a filing is an appealable agency action under A.R.S.Title 41.
• To the extent permitted by applicable statute, the ADOI may extend the
substantive review period by up to 15 calendar days to allow time for review of
additional or corrected information that it has requested. As reflected in Table A of
the draft rule, filings made pursuant to A.R.S. §§20-398 and 20-1591 are not subject
to any extension of the review period. Filings made pursuant to A.R.S. §§20-357
and 20-359 may not be subject to an extension of the review period, depending
upon the stated effective date of the filing. Filings made pursuant to A.R.S. §20-376
are subject to an extension of the review period only with the filer’s consent.
• An insurer may withdraw a submission or filing by written notification received by the
ADOI at any time prior to the ADOI returning a submission or approving or
disapproving a filing.
Table A of the draft rule sets forth five types of filings that are subject to either a
statutory deemer provision or that must be on file a minimum number of days before the
filing may be effective. For filings subject to a 30-day deemer provision, those 30 days
must necessarily constitute the maximum substantive review period, and the
substantive review period may therefore not be extended. Filers must note that the
ADOI will not begin to calculate the 30-day deemer/substantive review period until the
filing is determined or deemed to be administratively complete. Therefore, it will be
necessary for the filer to build in the administrative completeness period when deciding
when to make a filing based upon its anticipated effective date. Again, upon request,
the ADOI will endeavor to affirmatively determine and notify the filer of completeness
rather than allow the completeness deemer period to elapse, in order to expedite the
filing.
In some cases (i.e., workers’ compensation rate and form filings), the statute requires
that filings must be made at least 15 days before the effective date of the filing. The
September 21, 2001
Page 6
ADOI requests the cooperation of filers in making filings sufficiently in advance of the
stated effective date in order to provide the full 30 days for review of the filings.
However, the substantive review period may have to be shortened to as little as 15 days
if the filer chooses to file on the last day permitted by law. In any event, the substantive
review period will not begin to run until the submission is determined to be or deemed
administratively complete, and filers must account for the completeness period when
making submissions.
Requests for Additional or Corrected Information
The time frames for both the administrative completeness and substantive review
periods are brief. This is by design to accomplish the ultimate “Speed to Market” goal.
Insurers must be prepared to respond accurately and promptly to the ADOI’s requests
for additional or corrected information during both review segments. If the ADOI does
not receive a response to its request for additional information, the submission will be
returned or the filing will be disapproved. To avoid this result, insurers must take
seriously the need for filings to be accurate, and compliant. The ADOI is prepared,
whenever possible, to make the notices of deficiency in a submission or filing via
facsimile and electronic mail and will accept the insurers responses to same via those
means.
Promulgation of Proposed Rule
The ADOI intends to formally promulgate the draft rule following the 2002 legislative
session. In the interim, it will be the Department’s practice to review insurance product
filings pursuant to the process set forth in the draft rule, as described in this bulletin.
The ADOI intends to treat this as a “demonstration” period to identify and resolve
problems that may arise as we implement this procedure. The ADOI encourages
feedback from insurers, rating organizations, advisory organizations and other
interested parties during this time to assist us in fine tuning the standardized process
for filings. During the upcoming legislative session, the ADOI will likely seek to modify
existing statutes that may conflict with the proposed rule.
SYSTEM FOR ELECTRONIC RATE AND FORM FILING (SERFF)
As of September 1, 2001 the ADOI began accepting SERFF filings for all life insurance,
for 24 major property and casualty insurance lines and 104 sublines or subcategories of
insurance, including personal lines and commercial lines insurance. On October 1,
2001, the ADOI will also accept SERFF filings for annuities, long term care insurance,
Medicare supplement insurance, credit life and credit disability insurance and individual
disability (health) insurance filings.
SERFF enables insurers to submit rate and form filings electronically to state reviewers
and enables state reviewers to facilitate the management, analysis,
September 21, 2001
Page 7
disposition and storage of filings. Some of the specific benefits are:
• Electronic access to state filing requirements will result in more accurate filings by
insurers;
• Filing completeness check prior to SERFF submission helps ensure complete
filings;
• Electronic submissions will reduce filing preparation time and eliminate the need for
copying paper filings and associated delivery issues;
• Electronic processes speed the review cycle and facilitate faster reaction to market
changes, enhance competitive advantage, allow products to be brought more
quickly to the marketplace and accelerate revenues;
• On-line access, automated tracking and indexed retrieval facilitate better
management of the filing process;
• Uniform electronic header sheets provide increased efficiencies and
standardization;
• Electronic “highway” provides easy quick communication between regulators and
insurers.
The transmittal forms and checklists discussed earlier in this bulletin have been
incorporated into SERFF and may be completed and transmitted to ADOI electronically
by those insurers participating in SERFF. Information about SERFF, including
requirements for industry participation, is available at www.serffcentral.com.
Questions concerning the matters discussed in this bulletin should be addressed to
Dennis Babka for life and health products, [(602) 912-4621/dbabka@id.state.az.us],
and Deloris Williamson for property and casualty products, [(602) 912-4618/
dwilliamson@id.state.az.us].
09/21/01
1
9/21/2001DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES
ONLY
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
TITLE 20. COMMERCE, BANKING AND INSURANCE
CHAPTER 6. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
ARTICLE 00. SPEED TO MARKET PLAN
R20-6-0001. Definitions
In this Article the following definitions apply:
“Administratively complete filing” or “filing” means information or materials filed with the
Department under this Article that have been determined or allowed to be deemed by
the Department to contain all of the information and materials necessary to commence
a substantive review.
“Submission” means the information or materials filed with the Department under this
Article that have not been determined by the Department to be administratively
complete.
“Substantive review” means the qualitative evaluation by the Department of an
administratively complete filing to determine whether the filing satisfies all the
requirements established by statute, rule, or other law necessary to approve the filing.
09/21/01
2
R20-6-0002. Applicability
This Article applies to any rate and form submissions and filings that are required under
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 20, Chapters 2, 4, 5, and 6 to be filed with the
Department prior to use. Submissions and filings with review timeframes that are
different from those in R20-6-0003 and R20-6-0004 are listed in Table A. This Article
does not apply to health care service organizations.
R20-6-0003. Administrative Completeness Review
A.
The Department shall determine whether a submission is an administratively
complete filing within 15 calendar days of receipt of the submission.
B.
If, prior to the conclusion of the administrative completeness review, the
Department determines that the submission is not administratively complete, the
Department shall so notify the filer and shall return the submission to the filer with a
statement of the deficiencies. If the Department does not timely notify the filer that the
submission is not administratively complete, the submission is deemed an
administratively complete “filing.”
C.
The Department’s determination that a submission is not administratively
complete does not constitute an appealable agency action under the Arizona Revised
Statutes, Title 41, Chapter 1.
09/21/01
3
R20-6-0004. Substantive Review
A.
The Department shall complete a substantive review of a filing within 30 calendar
days after a submission is determined or deemed to be an administratively complete
filing. Upon completion of the substantive review, the Department shall notify the filer
that either:
1.
The filing is approved;
2.
The filing will be disapproved unless the filer corrects deficiencies listed in
the notice and files with the Department, additional or corrected
information before the end of the substantive review period; or
3.
The filing is disapproved.
B.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Department may extend the
substantive review period by up to 15 calendar days to allow time for the Department to
review additional or corrected information. The filings that are not subject to an
extension of the substantive review period are listed in Table A.
R20-6-0005. Withdrawal of a Submission or Filing
A filer may withdraw a submission or filing by written notification received at the
Department at anytime before the Department returns a submission, or approves or
disapproves a filing. The filer may subsequently make a new submission.
R20-6-0006. Method of Communication
The Department may notify the filer of the Department’s decision on a submission or
filing by facsimile, electronic mail, or by use of the United States Postal Service. Any
09/21/01
4
other communication by the filer to the Department may be by facsimile, electronic mail,
or by the use of the United States Postal Service. Notification is effective on the date of
transmission, if made by facsimile or electronic mail, or on the date mailed.
Table A
Type of
Insurance
Statutory
Reference
Substantive
Review Period
Extension
Period
Rating system
and forms for
worker’s
compensation
A.R.S. § 20-357
15-30 days,
depending on
stated effective
date of filing
0-15 days,
depending on
stated effective
date of filing
Deviations from
filed workers
compensations
rates
A.R.S. § 20-359
15-30 days,
depending on
stated effective
date of filing
0-15 days,
depending on
stated effective
date of filing
Title insurance
rates
A.R.S. § 20-376
15-30 days,
depending on
stated effective
date of filing
15 days, and
additional with
consent of filer
Policy forms
A.R.S. § 20-398
30
None
Title forms
A.R.S. § 20-1591
30
None