No. 80-708
California Attorney General Opinion No. 80-708
Cite as Cal. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 80-708
_________________________
________________________________________________________________________
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
State of California
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN
Attorney General
:
OPINION
:
No. 80-708
:
of
:
JANUARY 8, 1981
:
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN
:
Attorney General
:
:
Lawrence Keethe
:
Deputy Attorney General
:
:
The Honorable Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor of the State or California,
has requested an opinion on a question which we have phrased as follows:
If a county supervisor, whose four-year term commenced in January 1979,
filed his written resignation on June 9, 1980, which by its terms was effective August 5,
1980, and the Governor filled the vacancy by appointment, how long would the appointee
hold office under that appointment?
CONCLUSION
If a county supervisor, whose four-year term commenced in January 1979,
filed his written resignation on June 9, 1980, which by its terms was effective, August 5,
1980, and the Governor filled the vacancy by appointment, the appointee would hold office
until the election and qualification of his successor. A successor could have been elected
at the November 4, 1980 general election if the laws for independent nominations were
1
80-708
followed. If no successor was so elected and qualified, the appointee would hold office for
the remainder of the four-year term.
On June 9, 1980, a supervisor in a general law county submitted his written
resignation to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, which resignation by its terms was to
be effective August 5, 1980. The resignation was filed by the Clerk and accepted by the
Board the same day it was submitted. The resignation occurred in the middle of the
supervisor’s term of office, which was not to expire until January 1983.
A written resignation takes effect upon the date mentioned therein (Meeker
v. Reed (1924) 70 Cal. App. 119, 123; § 1770)1 and only may be withdrawn if done so “(1)
before its effective date, (2) before it has been accepted, an (3) before the appointing power
acts in reliance on the resignation.” (Armistead v. State Personnel Board (1978) 22 Cal.
3d 198, 206.) Since in the factual situation before us, no withdrawal of the resignation was
attempted, we conclude that a vacancy was created on August 5, 1980, when the resignation
became effective according to its terms.
In a general law county, the resolution as to how and when this vacancy is to
be filled is determined by relevant provisions of the Government Code. Section 25060
provides that the Governor may fill the vacancy by appointment:
“Whenever a vacancy occurs in any board of supervisors, the
Governor shall fill the vacancy. The appointee shall hold office until the
election and qualification of his successor.
Section 25061 provides when the successor to the appointee is to be elected:
“The election of a supervisor to fill the vacancy for the unexpired term
shall be held at the next general election, unless the term expires on the first
Monday after January 1st succeeding the election.” (Emphases added.)
Where the language of statutes is clear, their plain meaning should be
followed. (Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19 Cal. 3d 152, 155;
Leroy T. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Cal. 3d 434, 438.) As was stated by
the Supreme Court in People v. Belleci (1979) 24 Cal. 3d 879, 884:
“It is settled that ‘“We are required to give effect to statutes ‘according
to the usual, ordinary import of the language employed in framing them.’
(Citations.)”
‘(Palos Verdes Faculty Assn. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula
1 All unidentified statutory references are to the Government Code.
2
80-708
Unified Sch. Dist. (1978)21 Cal. 3d 650, 658.) Stated otherwise, ‘When
statutory language is thus clear and unambiguous there is no need for
construction, and courts should not indulge in it.’ (Solberg v. Superior Court
(1977) 19 Cal. 3d 182, 198; accord, People v. Boyd (1979) 24 Cal. 3d 285,
294; Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19 Cal. 3d
152, 155.)
We have declined to follow the plain meaning of a statute only
when it would inevitably have frustrated the manifest purposes of the
legislation as a whole or led to absurd results. (See, e.g., Younger v. Superior
Court (Mack) (1978) 21 Cal. 3d 102, 113–114; Silver v. Brown (1966) 63
Cal. 2d 841, 845.) . . .”
We believe the language of sections 25060 and 25061 is clear. Since a
vacancy occurred on August 5, 1980, the Governor could, under section 25060, appoint on
or after that date a person to fill such vacancy. The appointee would “hold office until the
election and qualification of his successor.” Under section 25061, the “successor” is to be
elected at the “next general election.”
It is noted that under section 24203 the “term of office” of the office of
county supervisor is four years. It should be pointed out that the phrase “term of office”
relates to the office itself and not to the incumbent. The term always remains the same.
(Holbrook v. Board of Directors, etc. (1937)8 Cal. 2d 158, 161. Thus, since four-year
terms commence in January and general elections are held in November of even-numbered
years, a general election may only be held at one of two times during a supervisorial “term
of office”: (1) at mid-term in November of the second year of the term or (2) at the end of
the term in November of the fourth year of the term. In the factual situation presented, a
plain reading of section 25061 compels the conclusion that the “next general election” is
the one immediately following the vacancy or November 4, 1980, in the second year of the
term of office.2
Since the resignation was submitted subsequent to the primary election in
June, no primary election was available as a means of nominating or, perhaps, electing a
person for the position. (See Elec. Code, § 6611.) Thus, the only manner by which there
could have been an election on November 4, 1980, would be through the independent
nomination process, which procedure offers a method for candidates to be nominated by
2 This interpretation is consistent with prior opinions of this office regarding similar issues.
(See 28 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 17, 18 (1956), 11 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 136 (1948); unpublished opn.
I.L. 76–96 (May 11, 1976).
3
80-708
petition without resort to the June primary and thus may be used in lieu of a primary
election. (Elec. Code, § 6800; Hedlund v. Davis (1956) 47 Cal. 2d 75.)
In order for the independent nomination procedure to be utilized, however,
there must be sufficient time during which the proper nomination procedures could be
completed. Under the facts as presented, since there was sufficient time to complete this
process (see, e.g., Elec. Code, §§ 6554, 6555, 6833, 23302.5; see also 28 Ops. Cal. Atty.
Gen. 17, 19(1956); 11 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 136 (1948)), the election for the unexpired term
could have been held November 4,1980. (See Hedlund V. Davis, supra, 47 Cal. 2d at p.
80.) The tenure of the gubernatorial appointee would then cease upon the election and
qualification of the person “elected” at this election. (28 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 17 (1956);
DeWoody v. Belding (1930) 210 Cal. 461.)
By its express terms, section 25061 is not applicable where the term of office
expires on the first Monday of January succeeding the next general election following the
vacancy.
The applicable statute in such cases is section 24202 which provides:
“Supervisors shall be elected at the general election prior to expiration of the term of the
incumbents.” Under section 24200 a supervisor elected pursuant to section 24202 (i.e., in
the general election held in the fourth year of the term of office) takes office at noon on the
first Monday after the January 1st succeeding their election.
Accordingly, it is our conclusion that a gubernatorial appointee to the
vacancy on the Board of Supervisors would hold office until the election and qualification
of the person elected at the November 4, 1980 general election. If no successor is elected
and qualified at this election, the appointee would hold office for the remainder of the four-
year term.
*****
4
80-708