No. 96-04
Payment of Geographically Adjusted Salaries to State Employees
Cite as Colo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 96-04
Stephen K. ErkenBrack
Chief Deputy Attorney General
Timothy M. Tymkovich
Solicitor General
Gale A. Norton
Attorney General
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
Office of the Attorney General
State Services Building
1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone (303) 866-4500
FAX
(303) 866-5691
FORMAL
"
)
OPINION
■1 )
)
No. 96-4
of
)
)
April 12, 1996
GALE A. NORTON
)
Attorney General
.
)
This opinion is rendered’"in response to an inquiry from the
Executive Director of the Department of Personnel regarding the
payment of geographically adjusted salaries to Colorado state
personnel system employees.
QUESTION PRESENTED AND CONCLUSION
May the salaries paid to employees in the Colorado state
personnel system differ according to the geographical location of
the work assignment?
No. The Colorado Constitution prohibits consideration of
geographical location in setting base pay ranges for like duties so
classified. The Constitution does not prohibit the passage of laws
that permit additional reimbursement to employees above base salary
in "consideration of particular employment circumstances.
r'r
ANALYSIS
' ? ((1
hi 5'; ■
.
;
•
■
'
The question presented is a variation of a question propounded
to a previous Attorney General. In response to the question, "May
the salaries paid to employees under the Colorado state personnel
system differ according to geographic region?", Duane Woodard
concluded, they could not.
Op. Att'y Gen.. (Feb. 16, 1983, 1983 WL
167519.
)
;
.
.
The Colorado Constitution provides that persons in the state
personnel system "shall be graded and compensated according to
standards of efficient service which shall be the same for all
persons having like duties."
Colo. Const. Art. XII, § 13(8).
Each employee, is compensated through his or her base pay, defined
by the Personnel Board Rules, 4 CCR 801-1, R 12-1-4 (9-93) as an
employee's monthly or hourly rate of pay,
excluding shift
differential, on call, overtime, call back, and other types of
premium pay.
.
,
The statutory and regulatory framework for the personnel
system observes the constitutional mandate of equal pay for equal
work by requiring classification and compensation based upon the
nature,
rather than location,
of the work.
See,
e . g . §
24-50-104 (3) (c) , C.R.S. (1988) (positions having comparable duties
and responsibilities shall be grouped into classes subject to the
same descriptive title); § 24-50-103 (3) (f), C.R.S. (1988) (the
Personnel Director shall allocate individual positions to classes
based on a clear evaluation of duties and responsibilities assigned
by the appointing authorities).
Moreover, Colorado case law requires classifications of
different positions within the state personnel system to be based
on the nature of activities performed at work. A position consists
of particularly defined duties and responsibilities.
Dempsey v.
Romer. 825 P.2d 44 (Colo. 1992); § 24-50-104 (3) (f) , C.R.S. (1988).
A class consists of one or more positions sufficiently similar in
duties, responsibilities, complexity of tasks and required skill,
knowledge and ability to justify the establishment of identical
requirements of education and experience and the administration of
identical competitive tests.
Demosev at 49; See also Vivian v.
Bloom. 115 Colo. 579, 586, 177 P.2d 541, 544 (1947)(standards may
include elements such as definition of position, typical tasks,
minimum qualifications of experience and education, knowledge and
abilities,
personal
characteristics
and
physical
standards
indicated, and responsibilities of the position).
Accordingly, classifications of like duties are determined
solely by reviewing the activities performed on the job.
Like
duties do not take into account the specific location of the
employment.1 Therefore, the Colorado Constitution's mandate to pay
employees the same for like duties does not allow paying some
employees more or less than others in the same class solely because
the job exists in a location where the cost of living is above or
below other areas of the state.
JAfter the job is classified based on the activities performed,
the overall base pay range is determined by referring to surveys
which include consideration of employment outside the Denver
metropolitan area, as well as to so-called internal alignment
considerations (i.e., unique Colorado positions for which no pay
data is available) § 24-50-104 (5) (b) (I) (A) , C.R.S (1995 Supp.).
Thus, geography is taken into account generally in setting base
salaries.
2
This is not to say the state is precluded from paying
additional consideration or reimbursing costs the state creates by
restricting the temporal or geographic proximity between the
employee's home and the job site. The constitution requires salary
equality only in valuing the core duties actually performed.
Although the question of how to implement payments in excess
of base salaries is beyond the scope of this opinion, it is
noteworthy that a number of provisions address different mechanisms
for such expenditures.
Various statutes allow the Personnel
Director or the State Controller to provide additional payments to
meet differing circumstances in-employment.
See § 24-50-104 (9),
C.R.S. (1988 and 1995 Supp.) (Personnel Director sets premium pay
and other fringe benefits); See also. § 24-30-202(22), C.R.S.
(1988)
(State Controller, with the approval of the Governor,
authorizes perquisites).
These statutes reflect the General
Assembly's determination that the constitutional mandate of equal
pay for similar work does not proscribe payment for employment
conditions beyond core job duties.
Statutes are presumed
constitutional and are entitled to deference by the courts.
In Re
Interrogatories Relating to the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund.
___ P.2d ___ (Colo. 1996), 20 Brief Times Reporter 433 (Colo.
1996).
.
SUMMARY
The essential constitutional criterion of the same pay for
like duties must be respected in salary structures for classified
state employees when determining base pay.
The basic level of
compensation paid to employees with like duties may not vary
according to the mere geographic location of the job.
Any
additional remuneration must be based upon factors other than the
core job duties of the classification involved.
GAN:14154, 12713:wp
AG Alpha: PH AD AGAUQ
AG File: P:\SS\SSBAIRJD\GEOGRAPH.AGO
First Assistant Attorney General
''JOHN D. BAIRD
Assistant Attorney General
3