No. 03-06
No-03-06 (HIPAA Rules for Disclosures to Law Enforcement)
Cite as Colo. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 03-06
KEN SALAZAR
Attorney General
DONALD S. QUICK
Chief Deputy Attorney General
ALAN J. GILBERT
Solicitor General
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE SERVICES BUILDING
1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone (303) 866-4500
FAX (303) 866-5691
FORMAL
OPINION
Of
KEN SALAZAR
Attorney General
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 03-06
AG Alpha No. PS PA AGBAZ
HIPAA Rules for Disclosures to
Law Enforcement
September 30, 2003
This opinion describes the types of health information that may be disclosed to law
enforcement officials under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996, 42 U.S.C. Sections 1320d – 1320d-8 (2003) (“HIPAA”). It is issued at the request of
Lieutenant Colonel Gary L. Coe, of the Colorado State Patrol.
Question Presented and Answer
Question: When may a health care provider disclose protected health information to law
enforcement officials under HIPAA?
Answer: HIPAA permits health care providers to disclose protected health information to
law enforcement officials under several complicated disclosure rules. Highlights of these rules
include:
• Providers are required under Colorado law to report certain bullet and other wounds
and injuries to law enforcement, and HIPAA expressly permits these types of
mandatory disclosures to law enforcement.
• Disclosures of limited identifying information are permitted in response to an official
inquiry from law enforcement to identify or locate a suspect or fugitive.
• Health care providers may voluntarily alert law enforcement of a suspicious death or
a crime on their premises.
• Emergency medical personnel may advise law enforcement officials of information
concerning the nature and commission of a crime and the location of the crime,
victims or perpetrators.
- 2 -
• HIPAA permits disclosures to law enforcement to avert a serious threat to public
health or safety and to report child abuse or neglect, domestic violence, and adult
abuse or neglect.
HIPAA’s varied and complex disclosure rules may also permit other public health and public
interest disclosure in particular circumstances, depending upon the purpose of the disclosure.
Discussion
HIPAA is a comprehensive federal statute that is designed, in part, to provide national
standards for the protection of certain health information.1 These statutory privacy provisions
have been interpreted in a highly complex regulation issued by the federal Department of Health
and Human Services and known as the HIPAA Privacy Rule.2 The HIPAA Privacy Rule plays a
central role in the discussion that follows.
Colorado’s law enforcement personnel sometimes require medical information that is
covered by HIPAA protections in order to carry out their public safety functions. These law
enforcement needs raise difficult questions of federal law concerning the types of medical
information that health care providers can disclose to law enforcement officials. This opinion
addresses those questions.
This opinion is accompanied by a comprehensive attachment that sets forth a chart
explaining the legal rules concerning HIPAA and law enforcement. This chart is included to
provide easier access for law enforcement officials to the complex rules discussed below.
Finally, this opinion is limited in important respects. It addresses HIPAA’s rules in the
abstract, but a conclusion as to whether a specific disclosure is permitted under the HIPAA
Privacy Rule in a specific circumstance typically depends upon who is making the disclosure, the
facts and circumstances of the disclosure, and the purpose of the disclosure. Also, this opinion
does not address other federal laws that may impose restrictions upon the release of confidential
medical information in particular circumstances. For these reasons, and assuming time is
available, law enforcement officials are encouraged to seek legal guidance when specific
circumstances arise.
Application of HIPAA. HIPAA’s health information disclosure rules apply to “covered
entities.” This term is defined to include a health plan, a health care clearinghouse, and a health
care provider who transmits protected health information in electronic form in connection with a
covered transaction.3 (Covered entities are referred to below collectively as “health care
providers.”) Most emergency medical and other health care personnel are covered and are
required to comply with the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
As a general rule, the HIPAA Privacy Rule forbids a health care provider from using or
disclosing a patient’s protected health information without written authorization from the patient,
1 65 Fed. Reg. 82,464 (Dec. 28, 2000).
2 45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164 (“HIPAA Privacy Rule”). Available at www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa.
3 45 C.F.R. § 160.102(a) (2003).
- 3 -
except for treatment, payment, and health care operations. 45 C.F.R. § 164.506(a). The rule
restricts only the disclosure of “protected health information,” which is defined as individually
identifiable health information that is transmitted or received by a covered entity, excluding
certain educational and employment records. 45 C.F.R. § 164.501. This opinion discusses the
exceptions to the general rule that permit public interest disclosures to law enforcement officials.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule allows the disclosure of protected health information by health
care providers – absent a patient’s authorization – for a variety of public interest reasons. 45
C.F.R. § 164.512. When a disclosure is permitted by the rule, a health care provider must also
determine whether a law makes that disclosure mandatory. Non-mandatory public interest
disclosure provisions are permissive, and the disclosing health care provider then generally has
discretion to choose not to disclose even though it legally could do so.4
The HIPAA Privacy Rule is not concerned solely with the need for law enforcement
officials’ access to protected health information.5 Rather, it balances the competing interests of
law enforcement and individual privacy. The preamble to the HIPAA Privacy Rule explains:
The importance and legitimacy of law enforcement activities are beyond question,
and they are not at issue in this regulation. We permit disclosure of protected
health information to law enforcement officials without authorization in some
situations precisely because of the importance of these activities to public safety.
At the same time, individuals’ privacy interests also are important and legitimate.
As with all other disclosures of protected health information permitted under this
regulation, the rules we impose attempt to balance competing and legitimate
interests.
65 Fed. Reg. 82,678 (Dec. 28, 2000).
The requirement of an official request by law enforcement. An official request from law
enforcement is needed by a health care provider in order to prompt certain disclosures. 45 C.F.R.
§ 164.512(f)(2) and (3). These include disclosures of protected health information needed to
identify or locate a suspect, fugitive, material witness or missing person and disclosures
concerning the victim of a crime. Id. Other disclosures to law enforcement can be made by a
health care provider without an official request. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(1), (4), (5) and (6). These
include disclosures required by law; to report a suspicious death; to report crime on the premises;
during a medical emergency about a crime, victim or suspect. Id.
4 The only disclosures required by the HIPAA Privacy Rule are disclosures at the request of the
individual or by the federal Department of Health and Human Services. 45 C.F.R.
§ 164.502(a)(2) (2003), and neither is likely to be important to law enforcement officials.
5 The HIPAA Privacy Rule broadly defines a law enforcement official to include an officer or
employee of the United States, a State, territory, political subdivision or Indian tribe who is
empowered by law to investigate an official inquiry into a potential violation of law, or prosecute
or conduct a criminal, civil or administrative proceeding of an alleged violation of law. 45 C.F.R.
§ 164.501 (2003).
- 4 -
Accounting to the individual involved for disclosures to law enforcement officials. The
HIPAA Privacy Rule requires that health care providers give an accounting of certain disclosures
to the individual involved upon that individual’s request. 45 C.F.R. § 164.528. Disclosures to
law enforcement under section 512 of the HIPAA Privacy Rule are one of the types of
disclosures that require such an accounting.
It is the responsibility of the health care provider to account for disclosures to law
enforcement officials. A summary accounting can be provided for multiple disclosures to the
same entity under section 512 of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. 45 C.F.R. § 164.528(b)(3).
The significant accounting burden associated with disclosures by health care providers to
law enforcement officials undoubtedly contributes to a reluctance to make disclosures under the
HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Bullet wounds and injuries. Health care providers may disclose protected health
information on their own when that disclosure is required by law. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(a) and 45
C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(1)(i). This exception includes laws that require the reporting of certain types
of wounds or other physical injuries. Id. The use of the information and the disclosure must
comply with and be limited to the requirements of the particular law involved. Id.
In Colorado, licensed physicians are required by state law to notify law enforcement of
certain bullet wounds and other injuries:
It shall be the duty of every licensee [physician] who attends or treats a bullet
wound, a gunshot wound, a powder burn, or any other injury arising from the
discharge of a firearm, or an injury caused by a knife, an ice pick, or any other
sharp or pointed instrument that the licensee believes to have been intentionally
inflicted upon a person, or any other injury that the licensee has reason to believe
involves a criminal act, including injuries resulting from domestic violence, to
report such injury at once to the police of the city, town, or city and county or the
sheriff of the county in which the licensee is located . . . .
Section 12-36-135(1), C.R.S. (2002). This statutory duty to report injuries overcomes the
physician-patient privilege which would ordinarily protect information the physician observes
during an examination. See Section 12-36-135(3), C.R.S. (2002); People v. Covington, 19 P.3d
15 (Colo. 2001).
In Colorado, therefore, licensed health care providers must disclose information to law
enforcement officials concerning gunshot and other wounds and injuries they believe involves a
criminal act. Nothing in HIPAA prohibits this disclosure, and the HIPAA Privacy Rule permits
disclosures required by state law. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(1)(i). Colorado law requires the
reporting of these injuries to law enforcement “at once” and without further procedural
requirements.
A health care provider need not limit its disclosures required by law to a minimum
necessary amount of information, which is a limit that applies in other circumstances under
- 5 -
HIPAA.6 Nevertheless, the disclosure is limited to the amount of information mandated by State
law. Under Colorado’s mandatory reporting law, disclosures required by law are limited to a
physician’s observations of the injury.7
In general, disclosures required by law are subject to the verification procedures of the
HIPAA Privacy Rule. This requires a health care provider to verify the identity and authority of a
law enforcement official prior to making a disclosure.
Court orders and other legal process. Other disclosures required by state law and
expressly allowed by HIPAA include responses to court orders and warrants; subpoenas or
summons issued by a judicial officer; grand jury subpoenas; administrative and civil subpoenas;
and civil or investigative demands authorized by law if the information is relevant, specific,
limited and material to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry and de-identified information
cannot be used under the provisions of 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(1)(ii). These disclosures are
subject to ordinary legal process and are limited to the requirements of the court order or
subpoena.8
Disclosures to identify or locate a suspect, fugitive, material witness or missing
person. The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits disclosure of limited information in response to a law
enforcement request for information that is to be used to identify or locate a suspect, fugitive,
material witness or missing person. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(2). Requests made on behalf of law
enforcement are permitted and include providing the media with information in order to request
the public’s assistance in identifying a suspect, or information to include on a “wanted” poster.9
Only limited information may be released by a health care provider to law enforcement
under this rule: name; address; date and place of birth; social security number; ABO blood type
and rh factor; type of injury; date and time of treatment; date and time of death; and description
of distinguishing physical characteristics including height, weight, gender, race, hair and eye
color, presence or absence of facial hair, scars and tattoos. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(2)(i). No DNA
information may be disclosed. Disclosure of other information is a violation of HIPAA, unless it
is allowed under some other provision of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
This section of the HIPAA Privacy Rule does not allow a health care provider to reveal
the hospital location of a victim or perpetrator of a crime, since this is not included in the list of
information that may be disclosed. Nevertheless, other sections of the HIPAA Privacy Rule do
allow a health care provider to disclose the location of a victim or perpetrator when law
enforcement is investigating a crime. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(6).
Victims of a crime. Following an official inquiry from law enforcement, the HIPAA
Privacy Rule permits disclosure of protected health information to law enforcement about the
6 45 C.F.R. § 164.502(b)(2)(v) (2003).
7 Section 12-36-135(3), C.R.S.
8 The HIPAA Privacy Rule has other requirements for responding to a subpoena or court order
issued by parties in the course of a judicial proceeding. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e).
9 65 Fed. Reg. 82,532 (Dec. 28, 2000).
- 6 -
victim of a crime – if the victim consents to the disclosure. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(3).10 If a
victim’s consent cannot be obtained due to incapacity or emergency, health care providers may
disclose information only upon a specific representation by law enforcement that the information
is needed to determine if a crime has occurred, is not intended to be used against the victim, and
that immediate law enforcement activity depends upon the disclosure and would be materially
and adversely affected by waiting for the victim’s consent. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(3)(ii). Also,
the disclosure must be in the best interest of the victim, as decided in the health provider’s
professional judgment. Id.
Colorado’s mandatory reporting law broadly requires reporting of any “injury that the
licensee has reason to believe involves a criminal act” and includes injuries resulting from sexual
assault.11 This law only permits disclosure of injuries the physician observes during an
examination, and not statements made to a physician during the examination. To obtain
information from victims other than an observed injury, the victim’s consent is generally
required. Consent for such disclosures may be made orally.12
Deaths. The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits disclosure of information to law enforcement
about decedents if the health care provider suspects that death may be the result of criminal
conduct. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(4). Disclosures concerning suspicious deaths need not be made
in response to an official law enforcement inquiry; health care providers may voluntarily disclose
information about suspicious deaths to law enforcement if they have a good faith basis for
believing the death may have resulted from criminal conduct. Colorado’s mandatory reporting
law also requires licensed health care providers to report injuries, including death, they believe
resulted from a criminal act. Section 12-36-135(1), C.R.S. (2002).
Crime on the premises of a health care provider. The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits
disclosure of information to law enforcement when a health care provider has a good faith belief
the information is evidence of criminal conduct on the premises of the provider. 45 C.F.R.
§ 164.512(f)(5). This disclosure does not require an official request from law enforcement, and
permits the covered health care provider voluntarily to disclose such information.
Reporting crime in emergencies. The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits disclosure of
information to law enforcement concerning a crime in a medical emergency. 45 C.F.R.
§ 164.512(f)(6). The emergency must be off the premises of the health care provider and the
disclosure must be to alert law enforcement to the commission and nature of a crime; location of
a crime or victim; and identity, description and location of the perpetrator of the crime.
10 The Office of Civil Rights in the federal Department of Health and Human Services says that
the victim’s authorization is required before protected health information can be released about a
victim to law enforcement. Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health
Information, Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Page 116
(Dec. 3, 2002). Also available at http://www.hhs.gov/ocr, Frequently Asked Questions, Answer
349.
11 Section 12-36-135(1), C.R.S. (2003).
12 45 C.F.R. § 164.512.
- 7 -
Emergency personnel may reveal the location of a victim or suspect if this information is related
to the investigation of a crime.
Comments to the final HIPAA Privacy Rule regulations indicate this disclosure provision
was specifically added to permit such disclosures to law enforcement:
This added provision [45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f)(6)] recognized the special role of
emergency medical technicians and other providers who respond to medical
emergencies. In emergencies, emergency medical personnel often arrive on the
scene before or at the same time as police officers, firefighters, and other
emergency personnel. In these cases, providers may be in the best position and
sometimes the only ones in the position, to alert law enforcement about criminal
activity. For instance, providers may be the first persons aware that an individual
has been the victim of a battery or an attempted murder. They may also be in the
position to report in real time, through use of radio or other mechanism,
information that may immediately contribute to the apprehension of a perpetrator
of a crime.
65 Fed. Reg. 82,533 (Dec. 28, 2000).
The HIPAA Privacy Rule does not prohibit disclosures to law enforcement related to the
commission of a crime during an emergency and does not limit the type of information that can
be disclosed if it is related to the commission of a crime. Health care providers can disclose the
location of a victim or perpetrator of a crime when law enforcement is investigating a crime. An
official request from law enforcement is not required if law enforcement is investigating a crime.
Child abuse. The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits disclosure of health information to
appropriate governmental entities that are authorized by law to receive reports of child abuse. 45
C.F.R. § 164.512(b)(1)(ii). Colorado law requires that health care providers and other individuals
report suspected child abuse to county social services or local law enforcement. Section 19-3-
304, C.R.S. (2002). Thus, Colorado law requires, and the HIPAA Privacy Rule permits, covered
entities to disclose reports of child abuse or neglect to appropriate governmental authorities.13
Abuse and neglect, including domestic violence. The HIPAA Privacy Rule contains
special provisions to permit disclosures to report abuse, neglect or domestic violence other than
child abuse. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(c).
The disclosure must be to a government entity authorized by law to receive reports of
abuse. If the disclosure is required by law, and limited to the relevant requirement of law the
victim’s consent is not required. Again, Colorado law mandates the reporting of certain wounds
and injuries, including those resulting from acts of domestic violence, and disclosures mandated
by state law are permitted by the HIPAA Privacy Rule under 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(c)(1)(i) and do
not require the consent of the victim.14
13 65 Fed. Reg. 82,527 (Dec. 28, 2000).
14 Section 12-36-135(1), C.R.S. (2002).
- 8 -
Information other than the observed injury concerning abuse and domestic violence is not
required to be reported to law enforcement under Colorado law. It is a permissible disclosure
under the HIPAA Privacy Rule if the victim consents to the disclosure. The victim’s consent may
be oral. If the individual does not consent to the disclosure, the disclosure is allowed if it is
expressly authorized by statute and the covered entity believes in the exercise of their
professional judgment that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm. If an individual is
unable to consent because of incapacity, a government official must assure that the information
is not intended to be used against the individual, and that immediate enforcement activity
depends on the disclosure and would be materially and adversely affected by waiting for the
individual’s consent.
A covered entity must promptly inform the individual involved of such a disclosure
unless (a) it would risk serious harm to the individual or (b) the covered entity reasonably
believes a personal representative is responsible for the abuse and informing the representative
would not be in the best interest of the individual.
Disclosures to avert a serious threat to health or safety. The HIPAA Privacy Rule
permits health care providers to disclose information to law enforcement to avert a serious threat
to health or safety. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(j). The health care provider must have a good faith belief
that the disclosure: (a) is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the
health or safety of a person or the public and is to a person reasonably able to prevent or lessen
the threat, or (b) is necessary for law enforcement to identify or apprehend an individual because
of their admission to participation in a crime or because they appear to have escaped from a
correctional institution or from lawful custody. The disclosure is limited to the admission and
limited identifying information (section 164.512(f)(2)(i)), and may not include statements made
to initiate treatment, counseling or therapy to affect the propensity to commit a crime.
This provision of the HIPAA Privacy Rule permits disclosures consistent with the duty to
warn third persons at risk established in Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17
Cal. 3d 425 (1976).15 Colorado courts impose a duty to warn upon physicians and therapists
based upon a determination of several factors including the risk involved, the foreseeability and
likelihood of injury as weighed against the social utility of the defendant’s conduct, the
magnitude of the burden of guarding against the harm, and the consequences of placing the
burden of a duty on the defendant. Ryder v. Mitchell, 54 P.3d 885 (Colo. 2002).
Patient authorization. Disclosure of protected health information may be made under the
HIPAA Privacy Rule if the health care provider has the express, HIPAA-compliant authorization
of the individual whose protected health information is being disclosed, except for the disclosure
of certain psychotherapy notes. 45 C.F.R. § 164.502(a)(1)(iv). A HIPAA authorization must be
specific, limited in time and meet several requirements set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 164.508.
15 65 Fed. Reg. 82,538 (Dec. 28, 2000).
- 9 -
An authorization form that complies with HIPAA, developed by and for law enforcement
officials, is attached to this opinion as Attachment B.16
Enforcement of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Violators of the HIPAA Privacy Rule are
subject to government enforcement.17 If disclosure is not permitted under the rule but
information is released anyway, the disclosing health care provider is subject to civil penalties
and potential criminal sanctions.
Civil penalties are $100 for each violation, up to a maximum of $25,000 per year for all
violations of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-5(a)(1). Criminal penalties include
one to ten years of prison with penalties ranging from $50,000 to $250,000 for knowing
violations committed under false pretenses or with the intent to use protected health information
for malicious harm, personal gain, or commercial advantage. 42 U.S.C. 1320d-6.
As described in this opinion, HIPAA’s disclosure rules are complex and sometimes
difficult to apply. In circumstances in which a disclosure can invite civil or criminal penalties,
unsure health care providers understandably may be reluctant to make the disclosure.
The agency that enforces the HIPAA Privacy Rule has described its approach to
enforcement. It says:
. . . [T]o the extent practicable, OCR will seek the cooperation of covered entities
in obtaining compliance with the Privacy Rule, and may provide technical
assistance to help covered entities voluntarily comply with the Rule. See 45
C.F.R. § 160.304. As further provided in 45 C.F.R. § 160.312(a)(2), OCR will
seek to resolve matters by informal means before issuing findings of non-
compliance, under its authority to investigate and resolve complaints, and to
engage in compliance review.
68 Fed. Reg. 18,897 (April 17, 2003) (preamble to interim enforcement regulations).
Finally, an individual whose privacy rights are violated by improper disclosure under the
HIPAA Privacy Rule does not have an ability – under this statute – to recover damages for his or
her injury. There is no private right of action under HIPAA. The legal recourse for an individual
about whom a disclosure has been made is either to file a complaint with the Office of Civil
Rights or to proceed under some other legal theory.
HIPAA preemption of state law. The HIPAA Privacy Rule preempts contrary state laws
relating to the privacy of individually identifiable health information. 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-7. The
HIPAA Privacy Rule does not preempt state laws that protect more strictly the disclosure of
medical information. Also, HIPAA does not preempt state laws that provide for reports of
16 This authorization form was developed by the Office of the District Attorney for the First
Judicial District.
17 The Office of Civil Rights in the federal Department of Health and Human Services enforces
the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
- 10 -
disease, injury, child abuse, birth, or death. 45 C.F.R. § 160.203(c) (2003). The HIPAA Privacy
Rule therefore does not preempt Colorado laws that require health care providers to notify law
enforcement of bullet wounds and other injuries resulting from criminal conduct.
Historically, patient consent was obtained by law enforcement officials to avoid violating
Colorado’s theft-of-medical-record statute. The Colorado theft-of-medical-record statute, 18-4-
412, C.R.S. (2002), was recently amended to exempt disclosures by health care providers and
health plans that are covered entities under HIPAA.18 Disclosures by a covered health care
provider which are permitted under HIPAA are now permissible disclosures under Colorado law.
Disclosures under Colorado’s theft-of-medical-record statute are limited for entities that are not
covered under HIPAA, unless the disclosure is with the written authorization of the patient or an
appropriate court order. Section 18-4-412, C.R.S. (2002).
Conclusion
HIPAA is a complex set of federal statutory and regulatory rules that regulate the
disclosure of medical information to law enforcement officials. This opinion describes several of
the most important portions of these rules.
Issued this 30th day of September, 2003.
______________________________
KEN SALAZAR
Colorado Attorney General
ALAN J. GILBERT
Solicitor General
HEIDI J. DINEEN
Assistant Attorney General
State Services Section
1525 Sherman Street, 5th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80203
18 HB 03-1164, amending 18-4-412, C.R.S. (2002) effective July 1, 2003.