Health Insurance Rate Filing Submission Guidelines (repealed and replaced HC-81-18)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT BULLETIN NO. HC-81-19 FEBRUARY 15, 2019 TO: ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES, FRATERNAL BENEFIT SOCIETIES, HOSPITAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS, MEDICAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS AND HEALTH CARE CENTERS THAT DELIVER OR ISSUE INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE POLICIES IN CONNECTICUT RE: HEALTH INSURANCE RATE FILING SUBMISSION GUIDELINES This notice sets forth the requirements for all rate filing submissions made to the Insurance Department (Department) pursuant to sections 38a-183, 38a-208, 38a-218 and 38a-481 ofthe Connecticut General Statutes. All rate filings, including small group indemnity rate filings, must be filed with the Department pursuant to the requirements ofthe rate review regulations promulgated by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) pursuant to the Patient and Protection Act, P.L. 111­ 148, as amended (PPACA). A rate filing must accompany the forms approved by HHS to report unreasonable rate increases and will serve as the basis to determine if the unreasonable rates are justified. In accordance with the HHS final regulations at 45 CFR, Part 154, the company must provide a preliminary justification that consists ofa Rate Increase Summary (Part I) and a written descriptionjustifying the rate increase (Part II) that is consistent with 45 CFR §154.215. Filing Requirements While multiple market segments can be filed in one rate filing submission, the Department requests that the carrier include separate filings for each market segment (individual, small group and large group) that comply with the following information to assist the Department in its actuarial review: • A cover letter describing all policy forms affected by the requested rate change as well as the effective date ofthe requested rate change. • Historical experience from inception-to-date, this includes earned premium, paid claims, incurred claims, members, actual loss ratios and expected loss ratios (annual experience is appropriate for all years; monthly experience for the most recent two years). • A demonstration that the experience data submitted is consistent with the most recent financial statement filed with the Department pursuant to section 38a-53a of the Connecticut General Statutes. • Unit cost trend by broad service category, including actual unit cost data and impact ofprovider contract changes from experience period to rating period (medical and prescription drug separately). • Utilization trend by broad service category, including actual utilization data. • Impact of cost sharing leverage on trend. • Medical technology trend. • Benefit buy-down analysis and impact on trend. www.ct.gov/cid P.O. Box 816 • Hartford, CT 06142-0816 An Equal Opportunity Employer • Cost of each new benefit mandate or requirement due to change in law, separately identified, from the experience period to the rating period. This includes requirements of both state and federal law. • A comparison ofthe proposed retention charge in the filing to the most recently filed statutory financial statement for the regulated entity for which this filing is being made. • Claim lag triangles (separate triangles for medical vs. Rx) • The current capital and surplus for the regulated entity for which this filing is being made. • A demonstration that the increase requested in this rate filing will generate an expected medical loss ratio, for rebate purposes, that is consistent with the 80% prescribed by the federal law for individual health insurance and small group or 85% for large group, whichever applies to this rate filing. • Actuarial certification signed by a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries (MAAA). • Any additional information the Commissioner deems necessary for the review of rates. Carriers filing individual or small group rates must identify all estimates of which they are aware, of the risk adjustment transfer amount (paid or received) for the previous rating year. This should include the date of all estimates received, the source of those estimates, and the actual pmpm amounts. In addition, provide the risk adjustment transfer amounts by market segment scheduled to be published by the Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight (CCIIO) in June of each year. Explain any difference between the risk adjustment used in pricing and the latest published from CCIIO. Please note the risk adjustments in the CCIIO report have already been reduced by the administrative expense of 14%. All rate filings must be submitted via the National Association ofInsurance Commissioners System for Electronic Rate and Form Filings (SERFF). All fields in SERFF added for reporting requirements to HHS in accordance with PP ACA must be populated. Incomplete submissions may be rejected. In addition, carriers should submit the Uniform Rate Review Template (URRT), the Part III Actuarial Memorandum and the HIOS rate tables in a PDF format. Carriers should also provide a summary ofbenefits for each plan design along with the Actuarial Value calculator output that confirms compliance with the corresponding metal tier. Indicate the HIOS plan ID and the corresponding plan name on the summary of benefits for each plan. Any changes submitted after the initial filing should include a red-lined version as well as a clean copy to facilitate the review. For new products other than policies subject to the requirements of PPACA, the rates should be filed with the form filing in one submission using the Filing Type FORM/RA TE. Policies subject to PP ACA should file separate submissions for form and rate filings for new products or amendments. Rate increases should be filed as a separate rate filing submission for all products. Every rate filing submission that includes an increase ofpreviously approved rates shall include a summary ofthe rate increases requested and should be clearly marked as Appendix A. The appendix should include the following, but not be limited to: • For Small Group Filings, the overall requested increase should be stated as the average annual increase across all quarters of the new rate year and not limited to the annual increase from Quarter 1 ofthe previous rate year to Quarter 1 of the new rate year. • The requested increase for each plan contained within the rate filing and the effective date of those proposed rate increases. The requested increase for each plan should be identified as a specific percent increase. • Number of covered individuals for each product; number of covered policyholders; minimum current premium on a per member per month (pmpm) basis; minimum proposed premium on a pmpm basis; maximum current premium on a pmpm basis; maximum proposed premium on a pmpm basis and the percentage change. • Each component of the increase including trend, experience adjustments and any other factors that are a component of the requested increase. These can be identified as a specific percent or if appropriate a percent range. • A footnote listing any other factors that can have an impact on premium rates that have not been specifically identified in the appendix, including but not limited to age bands, gender, geographic area, smoking, etc. Annual Certifications to be Included as Part of the Rate Filing Carriers must provide a demonstration of compliance with mental health parity for each plan that utilizes varying copays within a service category as allowed in Bulletin HC-109. The Final Rules under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHP AEA) ( 45 CFR Part 146 and 147) provide tests for determining "substantially all" and "predominant" medical/surgical benefits for reviewing the financial requirements and quantitative treatment limitations. Carriers must include demonstrations that each plan utilizing varying copays meets the substantially all and predominant tests. Such demonstration must also include a certification of compliance with mental health parity signed by a member ofthe American Academy of Actuaries. After the initial approval, such demonstration and certification must be made annually. Any carrier that substitutes a non-dollar limit on an essential health benefit as permitted by PP ACA must file a certification and demonstration that such substitution is actuarially justified. Transparency Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. §l-210(b)(5)(B), the Connecticut Freedom oflnformation Act does not provide for an exemption for commercial or financial information that is required by statute. The information identified above as being required to enable the Department to fulfill its statutory rate review requirement is considered to be information required by statute and therefore, the Department will not grant any requests to hold these filings as confidential. Complete filings including all correspondence and documentation will be posted on the Department website and available for review and comment by the public. All public comments will be reviewed by the Department. Questions Please contact the Insurance Department Life and Health Division at cid.lh@ct.gov with any questions. Paul Lombardo Acting Insurance Commissioner