Excepted interests.

Cited. 183 C. 59; 219 C. 81; 239 C. 199. Trial court properly concluded that pursuant to Subdiv. (1), the easement over plaintiff's property as of 1996 deed was limited to the fixed location of 3 existing conduits, which constituted partial exercise of the easement, and that because plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence of damages resulting from partial encumbrance of the property, defendants were entitled to a directed verdict. 270 C. 487. Cited. 3 CA 550; 44 CA 683; 46 CA 525. Section's use of “other physical facility” refers to those physical objects that evidence an easement that themselves effectuate the easement itself and includes all of the items enumerated in the section, but does not include dissimilar items that may be found on a property that are not set forth in the section or otherwise within the class of those items, which are only, at best, mere indirect, possible indicators of an easement. 169 CA 653. Cited. 34 CS 31.