10 I&N Dec. 387 (BIA 1963)
Matter of CHIEN
Interim Decision #1307
MATTER OF CHIEN
In DEPORTATION Proceedings
A-10107638
Decided by Board October 29, 1963
An oxelumge vigitur alien who hog boon granted a waiver of the foreign-residence
requirement provided by section 212(e), Immigration and Nationality Act, as
amended, is not precluded by section 244(f) (2) from establishing statutory
eligibility for suspension of deporation under section 244(a) (1).
Cl/ARGE :
Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (2)3—Itemained
longer—admission as a nonimmigrant student and change of status
to exchange visitor.
The case comes forward pursuant to certification by the special in-
quiry officer of his decision dated August 2, 1963 ordering that the de-
portation of the respondent be suspended under the provisions of sec-
tion 244(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended.
Discussion as to Deportability: The respondent is a native and
citizen of China, 32 years old, male, who last entered the United States
on September 19, 1954, at which time he was admitted as a nonimmi-
grant student. His status was changed on May 8, 1959 to that of
an exchange visitor and he was subsequently granted until July 16,
1963 to effect his voluntary departure from the United States. On
December 28, 1962 the grant of voluntary departure was rescinded
and the respondent acknowledged that he has remained in the United
States thereafter without authority. Deportability is conceded and
is found to be established as charged in the order to show cause.
Discussion as to Eligibility for Suspension of Deportation:
The respondent was married on April 7, 1957. His wife had en-
tered the United States on November 3, 1956 as an exchange vis-
itor and is the beneficiary of a waiver of the two-year foreign resi-
dence requirement. They have two children, approximately four
and two years of age, both native-born citizens of the United States.
The respondent's wife is a pediatrician but is presently active only as a
housewife. She and the children are dependent entirely upon the
387
Interim Decision #1307
respondent for support. The respondent is an assistant professor of
psychology at Columbia University College of Physicians and Sur-
geons, engaged in problems of wound shock under contract with the
Office of the Army Surgeon General, and earns approximately $12,000
per year. His assets consist of $500 in savings and personal effects
valued at $2500.
Letters from professional associates and friends, reprints of re-
spondent's articles in various scientific publications and other docu-
mentary evidence have been submitted. This evidence establishes that
the respondent has been continuously physically present in the United
States since the time of entry, a period of at least the preceding seven
years.
A check of the local appropriate local and federal records have
failed to reveal an arrest or criminal record against the respondent.
Inquiry disclosed that he has no connection with subversive groups.
Affidavits of witnesses and an independent character investigation
establish that he has been a person of good moral character for more
than the preceding seven years. The respondent meets the good moral
character requirement for suspension of deportation as well as the
other requirement of a continuous period of residence of not less than
seven years immediately preceding the date of his application, and the
requirement that his deportation would result in extreme hardship to
himself as well as his spouse and children, the latter of whom are
citizens of the United States.
The respondent is the beneficiary of a visa petition filed in his be-
half by Columbia University on 'Tune 11, 1962 approved by the Service
on July 15, 1962 granting him preference status under section 908 (a)
(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. At the request of the
Department of Defense, based upon his research in the field of hemor-
rhagic shock and radiation syndrome for the Office of the Army Sur-
geon General, he has been granted a. waiver of the foreign residence
requirement for exchange visitors -under section 212(e) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act. However, since the first preference por-
tion of the quota for Chinese persons is oversubscribed presently, the
respondent cannot readily obtain an immigrant visa to otherwise adjust
his immigration status.
The respondent's case is an extremely meritorious one and he quali-
fies for suspension of deportation in every respect except for the ap-
parent bar interposed by section 244(f) of the Immigration and
Nationality Aet as amended by the Act of October 24, 1962 (76 Stat.
1247, P1.87-885) which provides :
(f) No provision of this section shall be applicable to an alien who * * * (2)
was admitted to the United States pursuant to section 101(a) (15) (J) or has
acquired such status after admission to the United States ; * * *
388
Interim Decision #1307
The respondent acquired the status of an exchange visitor on May 8,
1959. However, he has been granted a waiver of the two-year foreign
residence required for a change of status under section 212(e) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act. There remains to be considered
whether an alien who has an exchange visitor status but who has been
granted a waiver of the foreign residence requirement comes within
the bar of section 211(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as
amended.
The primary purpose of the Information and Educational Exchange
Act of 1948 was to promote international good will by mutual exchange
of persons to observe and study on the one hand and to teach im-
portant knowledge on the other. In establishing this program Con-
gress anticipated that the alien would employ the knowledge and skill,
thus acquired as the result of a stay here, in his own country. He was
declared ineligible for the privilege of suspension of deportation. The
ban against granting suspension of deportation to exchange visitors
was incorporated into section 402(f) of the Immigration and Na-
tionality Act. The Information and Educational Exchange Act of
1948 was amended on June 4,1956 (Public Law 84-555) to provide
that no person acquiring exchange status thereafter would be eligible
for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien
lawfully admitted for permanent residence unless he had been phys-
ically present in, a cooperating country for a period of two years fol-
lowing departure from the United States, except that such two-year
requirement might be waived by the Attorney General in the ease of
an alien whose admission to the United States was found by the At-
torney General to be in the public interest.
Section 201 of the Information and Educational Exchange Act was
repealed by the Mutual Exchange and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961
(Public Law 87-256) and the two -year foreign residence requirement
and waiver provisions in somewhat revised form were incorporated
into section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality -Act and sec-
tion 101(a) (15) (J) was added to include exchange visitors as a spe-
cific category of nonimmigrants. Although section 244(f) of the Im-
migration and Nationality Act as amended on October 24, 1962 at
first glance would also appear to bar voluntary departure to the classes
of aliens enumerated therein, such a construction was rejected in favor
of an interpretation allowing such relief in the cases of crewmen?
In commenting on the proposed amendment of section 244 by the
Act of October 24, 1962 the Congressional discussion as stated by
Congressman Feighan stated as follows: "Suspension of deportation
will not be available to alien crewmen and to persons who come to
1 Matter of Varga Rodrigues, Int. Dec. 1254.
389
Interim Decision #1307
the United States under the International Educational Exchange
Program and are under obligation to rattan to their native country
for at least two years to give their country the benefit of their Amer-
ican education and experience." 2 (Emphasis supplied.) From this
statement it may be fairly inferred that section 244(f) (2) was not
intended to bar suspension of deportation to an exchange visitor with
respect to whom the two-year foreign residence requirement had been
waived. Any other interpretation would result in a strange paradox.
Section 212(e) as amended permits the issuance of a visa, as well as
the granting of permanent residence to an exchange visitor with the
required waiver. Suspension of deportation under the Immigration
and Nationality Act is merely one method of adjustment of the status
of an alien to that of a permanent resident in addition to sections 245
or 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. There is no apparent
reason for denying adjustment of status to an applicant for suspen-
sion of deportation who has the required waiver while granting it to
an applicant under section 245 or section 249 of the Act. Where the
waiver has been granted in the public interest, it would appear that
Congress, in the same public interest, would authorize an alien to be-
come a permanent resident through suspension of deportation if he
could not adjust his status in some other manner.
Suspension of deportation is a remedial provision and any am-
biguity in the restriction of the grant of such relief should be resolved
in favor of the alien. The respondent has been granted a -waiver of
the two-year foreign residence period required of one who acquired
the status of an exchange visitor. Inasmuch as he is no longer re-
quired to return to his native country for two years, having been
granted the necessary waiver, he would appear to be eligible for sus-
pension of deportation and the bar of section 244(f) (2) would not
apply in such a case. Tho order of the special inquiry officer granting
the respondent the privilege of suspension of deportation under sec-
tion 244(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act will be ap-
proved.
ORDER: It is ordered that the order of the special inquiry officer
dated August 2, 1963 granting the alien the privilege of suspension
of deportation be and the same is hereby approved.
2 20 Congressional Record 22153 (daily edition, October 1, 1962).
390