053 NLRB 514
Star Dyers & Cleaners, Inc.
In the Matter of STAR DYERS & CLEANERS, INC., and AMALGAMATED
CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 395
Case No. 2-B-4054.-Decided November 8, 1943
Mr. Fred Eichmcswn, of Union City, N. J., for the Company.
Mr. David M. Schlossberg, of New York City, for the Amalgamated.
Mr. Morris G. Tusher, of New York City, for the International.
Mr. Robert Silagi, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by Amalgamated Clothing Workers of
America, Local 395, herein called the Amalgamated, alleging that a
question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation
of employees of Star Dyers & Cleaners, Inc., Union City, New Jersey,
herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board pro-
vided for an appropriate hearing.
Pursuant to due notice, said hear-
ing was held on August 16, 1943, and September 23, 1943, at Union
City, New Jersey, before Martin I. Rose and Richard J. Hickey, Trial
Examiners.
The Company, the Amalgamated, and International
Association of Cleaning & Dye House Workers, Local #4, A. F. of L.,
herein called the International, appeared and participated.
All
parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and
cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the
issues.
The Trial Examiners' rulings made at the hearing are free
from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
All parties were
afforded opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Star Cleaners & Dyers, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, has its prin-
cipal office and place of business in Union City, New Jersey.
The
53 N. L. R B., No. 91.
514
STAR DYERS
& CLEANERS, INC.
515
Company is engaged in the wholesale and retail garment cleaning and
dyeing business.
During the year 1942 , the Company's purchases of
raw materials, consisting principally of oil , solvents, and chemicals
used in cleaning and dyeing, amounted to about $10,000, 25 percent of
which was shipped to the plant in Union City from places outside the
State of New Jersey.
During the same period of time the Company's
total business amounted to approximately $77,000, about 40 percent of
which represents work performed on garments which were shipped to
points outside the State bf New Jersey.
During this period the Com-
pany owned and operated several trucks which made regular trips
between Union City and New York City, bringing and returning
garments for processing.
The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the
meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Local 395, affiliated
with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization
admitting to membership employees of the Company.
International Association of Cleaning & Dye House Workers, Local
#4, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is a labor organ-
ization admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On or about July 14, 1941, a contract was entered into between the
Company and the International for the term of 1 year. Said contract
contained a closed-shop provision and a clause which provided for auto-
matic renewal of the contract from year to year unless written notice
of cancellation was given by either party 30 days prior to the expira-
tion date.
On June 11, 1942, the Company notified the International of
its intention to terminate the contract.
Thereafter, by written agree-
ment, the parties agreed to extend the term of their contract to August
13, 1943.
The International alleges that by subsequent oral agree-
ments the parties continued the contract for 30-day periods until
November 1942, when they orally agreed to permit the renewal clause
of the contract to take effect, thus extending the life of their contract
to July 1943.
No notice of cancellation having been given by either
party prior to the expiration date in July 1943, the International
contends that the contract thereby automatically renewed itself for
the period of another year, to July 1944, and thus constitutes a bar
to a present election.
The Company's counsel testified.that there was
no agreement to renew the contract, either in writing or orally, be-
yond November 1942.
Uncontradicted evidence shows that the Amal-
516
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
gamated requested recognition as the collective bargaining representa-
tive of the Company's employees, which the Company refused, between
May 25 and 30, 1943.
The petition herein was filed on June • 5, 1943.
We find it unnecessary to resolve the conflict in testimony.
Assum-,
ing the contract to have been validly renewed to July 1943, both the
Amalgamated's request for recognition and the filing of its petition
occurred prior to the date on which the automatic renewal clause of
the contract could take effect.
We, therefore, find that the contract
and its purported' renewals do. not constitute a bar to a present
determination of representatives.
A statement of the Regional Director, introduced into evidence at
the hearing, and a statement made by one of the Trial Examiners
during the course of the hearing, indicate that the Amalgamated rep-
resents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter
found appropriate.:,
We find that a question affecting commerce• has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the mean=
ing of Section 9 (c) and Section-2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The parties agree that the appropriate unit should consist of. all
employees at the Company's Union City plant, including the engineer,
benziners, pressers, spotters, and the boilerman, but excluding the
store girl, employees of the commission drivers,2 clerical and super-
visory employees.
The parties disagree only as to two classifica-
tions, i. e., house drivers and commission drivers.
The Amalgainated
would include both categories of employees within the unit; the In-
ternational would exclude them both; the Company expressed no
position as to the former but would exclude the latter.
House drivers: In the course of its business, the Company trans-
ports garments from tailor shops to the plant where they are cleaned
or dyed and then returned. This function is performed by several
house drivers who operate company-owned trucks. In addition t0
acting as chauffeurs, the house drivers, from time to time, perform
such activities in the plant proper, as they are directed to, do. House
The Regional Director reported that the Amalgamated submitted 13 initiation cards, 8
of which bore the names of persons listed on the Company's pay roll of June 21, 1943,
which contained the names of 13 employees in the alleged appropriate unit. 'All 8 cards
bore apparently genuine original signatures and were dated in June 1943.
, -
The International submitted no evidence of representation
l and relies upon its closed-
shop agreement to show its interest in this proceeding.
2 Because of his inability to drive a truck , one, commission driver, employs a helper for
that purpose.
In addition, some of the commisson drivers employ part -time helpers, for
the most part school boys, who assist them at irregular intervals .
The parties agree that
all these individuals should be excluded from the appropriate unit.
STAR DYERS & CLEANERS, INC.
517
drivers are subject wholly to the Company's control and are paid
on a -combination salary and commission basis.
The International seeks the exclusion of house drivers on the
ground that its contract with the Company has always omitted them.
This is so, the International alleges, because truck drivers are under
the jurisdiction: of another affiliated union of the American Federa-
tion of Labor.
However, the Amalgamated 'does accept truck drivers
such as these into its membership and has contracts in the industry
which cover them.
Even though the house drivers are not part of
the contract unit, nevertheless their wages, working conditions, and
terms of employment are entirely controlled by the Company. Un-
der'these circumstances, we shall include house drivers in the plant-
wide unit.
Commission drivers: The Company has six commission drivers, all
of whom have regular routes of tailor shops which they service in
the same manner as house drivers.
They operate their own trucks
and pay all expenses incidental thereto.
Once a week the Company
debits each commission driver for the cost of processing the garments
he has brought to the plant.
The commission drivers in turn col-
lect a higher price from the tailors and retain the difference as their
own compensation.
After deducting operating expenses, commis-
sion drivers usually average $10 or more per week over the house
drivers.
The Company does not fix the working conditions of the
commission drivers as it does for house drivers.
Moreover, aside from
sorting their garments in the plant so as to facilitate rapid delivery
to the tailors, commission drivers spend all their time away from
the plant. In view of the substantial dissimilarity between the com-
mission drivers, and the house drivers and production and mainte-
nance employees, with respect to methods of compensation, hours,
and working conditions, we are of the opinion that their interests in
collective bargaining are not sufficiently akin to warrant their merger
in a single unit.
We-shall, accordingly, exclude commission drivers
from the appropriate unit.
We find that all employees of the Company at the Union City
plant, including house drivers, the engineer, benziners, pressers, spot-
ters, and the boilerman, but excluding the store girl, commission
drivers, employees of the commission drivers, clerical employees, and
all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge,
discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees or
effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for
the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section
9 (b) of the Act.
-518
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
, V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representatiofi which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the
employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the
pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of
Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in
the Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby
DinzcTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Star Dyers, &
Cleaners, Inc.. Union City, New Jersey, an election by secret ballot
shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30)
days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super-
vision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this
matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject
to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations,
among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV,
above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately
preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not
work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation
or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces
of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls,
but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged
for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of
the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by
Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Local 395, affiliated
with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, or by International
Association of Cleaning & Dye House Workers, Local #4, affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective
bargaining, or by neither.