054 NLRB 666
Evr-Klean Seat Pad Co.
In the Matter of EvR-KLEAN SEAT PAD COMPANY and UPHOLSTERERS'
LOCAL No. 21, AFFILIATED WITH UPHOLSTERERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION
OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL
Case No. 14-R-820.-Decided January 18 , 1944
Mr. Edmond A . B. Garesche , of St. Louis, Mo., for the Company.
Mr. Charles H. Muench, of St. Louis, Mo ., for the A. F. of L.
Messrs. Richard Brazier and Henry'Scherer, of St. Louis, Mo., for
the C. 1. 0.
Miss Marcia Hertzmark, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
-Upon a petition duly filed by Upholsterers' Local No. 21, affiliated
with Upholsterers' International Union .of North America, AFL,
herein called'the A. F. of L., alleging that a question affecting com-
merce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Evr-
Klean Seat Pad Company, St. Louis, Missouri, herein called the Com-
pany, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appro-
priate hearing upon due notice before David Karasick, Trial
Examiner.
Said hearing was held at St. Louis, Missouri, on De-
cember 8, 1943.
The Company, the A. F. of L., and Local 94,
Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, CIO, herein called the
C. I. 0., appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity
to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to intro-
duce evidence bearing on the issues.
The Trial Examiner's rulings
made' at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby
affirmed.
All parties were afforded opportunity to file briefs with the
Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Evr-Klean Seat Pad Company, a Missouri corporation with its sole
office and place of business at St. Louis, Missouri, is normally engaged
54 N. L. R. B., No. 98.
666
EVR-KLEAN SEAT PAD COMPANY
667
in the manufacture of automobile seat covers but is now engaged
almost exclusively in the manufacture of mosquito bars, insect field
bars, and haversacks, under contract with the War Department.
During the fiscal year ending October 31, 1943, the Company pur-
chased raw materials, consisting principally of cloth and fibre, valued
in excess of $100,000, of which .more than 50 percent was shipped to
its plant from outside the State of Missouri.
During the same period
the Company sold approximately $139,000 worth of finished products
manufactured at its St. Louis plant, of which more than 50 percent
was shipped to places outside the State of Missouri.
The Company admits, and we find, that it is engaged in commerce
within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Upholsterers' Local No. 21 , affiliated with Upholsterers' Interna-
tional Union of North America , is a labor organization affiliated with
the ' American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership em-
ployees of the Company.
Local 94, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, is a labor
organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations.
It admits to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On September 30, 1943, the A. F. of L. notified the Company that
it represented a majority of the employees and requested recognition
as the exclusive bargaining representative.
The Company replied by
letter of October 8, 1943, that it was under contract with the C. I. O.
On October 18, 1943, the C. I. O. requested that the Company agree
to certain changes in the afore-mentioned contract and the Company
gave its oral assent to some of the changes a few days later.
On No-
vember 2, 1943, the A. F. of L. again asked the Company to bargain
but was informed that the contract with the C. I. O. had been auto-
matically renewed.
The A. F. of L. filed its petition herein on
November 8, 1943.
The C. I. O. contends that, its contract with the
Company is a bar to our proceeding in the present case.
The Company
takes no position with reference to this question.
The contract which the C. I. O. contends is a bar to the present
proceeding contains the following provision : "
This agreement shall remain in force from December 17th, 1940,
to October 31st, 1942, and shall automatically continue for similar
periods in succession thereafter unless notice to terminate is given
in writing by either party hereto at least thirty (30) days before
the expiration of the above mentioned periods.
668
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
It is understood that either party of Contract may bring up
question of wages outlined in this Contract thirty (30) days prior
to October 31st, 1941.
The contract appears on its face to provide for renewal periods of
approximately 22 months ; however it is not clear from the testimony
at the hearing whether the parties intended to achieve this result, or
to provide for 1-year renewal periods following the original expira-
tion date of the contract.
We deem it unnecessary to decide this ques-
tion since, in either event, the contract does not constitute a bar to
this proceeding.
If we assume that the contract was intended to pro-
vide for 1-year renewal periods after October 31, 1942, the notice
served upon the Company by the A. F. of L. on September 30, 1943,
was timely in relation to the 30-day period provided in the contract
for notice of termination; and the renewal, after notice by the A. F.
of L. of its claim to represent a majority, cannot serve as a bar to our
proceeding herein.
On the other hand, if we assume that the con-
tract was interpreted by the parties in such a way as to provide for
renewal periods of approximately 22 months, it cannot constitute a
bar to an investigation and certification of representatives since, as we
have frequently held, a contract covering an unreasonable length of
time and which has been in effect for a year or more does not constitute
such a bar.1 It appears from the record that the usual, contract ex-
ecuted by the St. Louis Joint Board of the Amalgamated Clothing
Workers of America, with which Local 94 is affiliated, runs for a period
,of 1 year, with 1-year renewal periods, and there is nothing in the
present record to indicate the existence of or the necessity for a dif-
ferent custom applicable to the contract in question.
A statement of the Regional Director introduced in evidence indi-
cates that the A. F. of L. represents a substantial number of employees
in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate.2
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The A. F. of L., the C. I. 0., and the Company agree, and we find,
that all employees of the Company, excluding foremen, assistant fore-
men, errand boys, porters, watchmen, salesmen, office and clerical
employees, and supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote,
1 See Matter of The Trawler Company of America, 51 N. L. R. B. 1106, and cases cited
therein.
2 The Regional Director reported that the A. F. of L. submitted 27 designations, all
bearing apparently genuine, original signatures and 21 bearing the names of persons
whose names appear on the Company's pay roll of November 3, 1943, which contains the
names of 26 persons in the appropriate unit.
EVR-KLEAN SEAT PAD COMPANY
669
discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of em-
ployees, or effectively recommend such action constitute a unit appro-
priate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning
of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll
period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election,
subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela-
tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Evr-Klean Seat
Pad Company, St. Louis, Missouri, an election by secret ballot, shall
be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days
from the date of this Direction, under the the direction and supervision
of the Regional Director for the Fourteenth Region, acting in this
matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject
to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations,
among the employees of the Company in the unit found appropriate
in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period
immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees
who did not work during paid pay-roll period because they were ill
or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the
armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at
the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged
for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the election,
to determine whether they desire to be represented by Upholsterers'
Local No. 21, affiliated with Upholsterers' International Union of
North America, AFL, or by Local 94, Amalgamated Clothing Workers
of America, CIO, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by
neither.