060 NLRB 344
Sperry Gyroscope Co., Inc.
In the Matter of SPERRY GYROSCOPE COMPANY, INC. and LOCAL 87, IN-
TERNATIONAL MOLDERS & FOUNDRY WORKERS UNION OF NORTH AMER-
ICA, A. F. OF L. and LOCAL 450, UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE
WORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO
Case No. 2-RE-69.-Decided February 2,1945
Messrs. Andrew J. Perceival, James E. Connelly, Frank G. Gillar,
and Edward E. DaParma, all of Great Neck, Long Island, N. Y., for
the Company.
Messrs. Jerome Y. Sturm, Frank Jeanette, and A. Stein, of New
York City, for the Molders.
Messrs. Frank Scheirer, Michael Orfink, Joseph F. Fitzgerald, and
George Rooney, of New York City, for the UE.
Mr. A. Sumner Lawrence, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon petition duly filed by Sperry Gyroscope Company, Inc., Great
Neck, Long Island, New, York, herein called the Company, alleging
that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the represen-
tation of its employees, the National Labor Relations Board provided
for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Robert A. Levett,
Trial Examiner.
Said hearing was held at New York City between
November 10 and December 7, 1944.
The Company, Local 87, Inter-
national Molders &, Foundry Workers Union of North America,
A. F. of L., herein called the Molders, and Local 450, United Electrical,
Radio & Machine Workers of America, CIO, herein called the UE,
appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard,
to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence
bearing on the issues.
The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the
hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.'
All
parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
' Among other rulings, the Trial Examiner overruled the objections of counsel for the
Molders and the UE to the eliciting of testimony by the Trial Examiner on matters in
issue between the parties
The Board 's Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended,
Article III, Section 6 (conduct of .hearing ), states : "It shall be the 'duty of .the Trial
60 N. L. R. B., No. 71.
344
SPERRY GYROSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
345
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Sperry Gyroscope Company Inc., a New York corporation, has its
principal office at Great Neck, Long Island, New York, and is engaged
in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of aeronautical and marine
navigational instruments at Brooklyn, Garden City, and Great Neck,
New York. The only plant involved in the present proceeding is a
plant known as the Nassau plant which is located at a distance of
approximately 37/2 miles from Great Neck, Long Island, New York.
During the year 1943, the Company purchased raw materials valued
at more than $100,000, of which 20 percent was obtained from points
outside the State of New York.
During the same period, the Com-
pany's sales of manufactured products amounted'to more than $100,-
000, of which approximately 75 percent represents shipments made
to points outside the State of New York.
The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the
meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Local 87, International Molders & Foundry Workers Union of
North America, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is
a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the
Company.
Local 450, United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America,
affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor
organization admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On July 31, 1944, the Company received a letter from the UE claim-
ing that there were certain "work categories" located in the foundry
of the Company's Nassau plant which raised a question of jurisdiction
as between the UE and the Molders. Subsequent conferences between
the Company, the Molders, and the UE failed to produce an agreement
with regard to the employees claimed by the two unions herein con-
cerned.
The Company thereupon declined to bargain with either
union with respect to the disputed classifications prior to a determi-
Examiner to inquire fully into the question of representation "
In view of the foregoing
provision and the fact that a proceeding for the investigation and certification of repre-
sentatives is not an adversary proceeding but a proceeding for the purpose of ascertaining
the facts upon which the Board may act in an administrative capacity under the provisions
of the National Labor Relations Act, the objections above noted to the conduct of the Trial
Examiner are without merit.
346
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
nation by the Board of the issues outstanding between the two labor
organizations.
A statement of a Field Examiner for the Board, together with other
evidence introduced at the hearing, indicates that the UE and the
Molders each represents a substantial number of employees in the
disputed classifications.2
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. TIIE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Company, petitioner in the present proceeding, claims as ap-
propriate a unit consisting of all employees of the Company's foundry
at its Nassau plant, including among the usual foundry occupations
the classifications of sand casting cleaners and foundry laborers, but
excluding therefrom sand casting cleaner leaders, die casting clean-
ers, and die casting cleaner leaders, cutter sharpener, die casting ma-
chine operators, and die casting machine, operator leaders, furnace
tender leader, leader heat treating, leader inspector, inspectors first
class, inspectors second class, U. R. W. inspectors, leader laborer, ma-
chinists first class, machinists, machinists' helpers, leader maintenance
men, maintenance men first class, maintenance men second class, leader
molders, porters, stock clerk leaders, stock clerks, tool maker first class
leader, tool makers first class, tool makers second class, trades helpers,
welder leader, welders, production control, cafeteria, guards, time-
keepers; clerical employees, and all other supervisory employees.
The
parties are in agreement that such customary foundry classifications
as coremakers and apprentices, furnace tenders, machine molders and
apprentices, molders and their helpers, pourers, sand muller opera-
tors, shake-out men, and all laborers assisting the foregoing workers,-
constitute a well defined foundry unit. The parties are also in agree-
ment with respect to a majority of the exclusions requested by the
Company.
The only controversy, apart from minor issues relating
to leaders and certain foundry laborers, concerns the fringe classifi-
cations of sand casting cleaners, die casting cleaners, and die casting
machine operators.
The Company and the Molders would include,'
while the UE would exclude, sand casting cleaners.
On the other
2 The Field Examiner reported that the UE had submitted 170 designations consisting
of application cards, of which 100 , dated largely in 1943 and 1944 . including 85 dated in
July 1944 and 6 undated ; bear the names of employees on the pay roll of August 21, 1944,
In the foundry unit consisting of 361 employees
The Field Examiner further reported that
a cross-check of the said 100 cards against the names of workers listed as "casting
cleaners ," which classification consists of about 103 workers , and constitutes the principal
issue between the parties , indicates that of the said 100 cards a total of 85 bear the names
of persons so classified
The parties stipulated at the hearing that both labor organizations
had representation among the employees in dispute.
SPERRY GYROSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
-
347
hand, the Company and the UE are agreed upon the exclusion of die
casting cleaners and die casting machine operators, -both of which
classifications the Molders would include in the recognized unit of
foundry employees.3
The employees referred to as sand casting cleaners are identified
on the Company's pay roll as comprising approximately 75 percent of
the group designated thereon as "casting cleaners," a classification
which also includes "die casting cleaners," although the latter work
under different supervision, and perform work which is substantially
different from that of sand casting cleaners. The work of said casting
cleaners consists in general of preparing for subsequent machining in
the factory area, sand castings which have previously been cast by
the molders, a recognized craft group, and admittedly 'a part of the
foundry unit.
Like the latter, sand casting cleaners, who are located
in the foundry adjacent to the molders, are among the highest rated
hourly paid workers in the foundry.
The specific function of sand casting cleaners is to remove foreign
matter, surplus metal, and other substances which become attached
to the sand casting in the process of its formation.
The function in
question involves five principal operations, namely, sand, blasting,
sawing, chipping, grinding, filing and burring.
While for the most
part, a sand casting cleaner assigned to one of these particular steps
generally spends most of his time at such assignment, all such opera-
tions are generally familiar to most of the sand casting cleaners
through a company policy of rotating workers from one operation to
another according to the volume of work and the demand for eln-
ployees in each operation.4
Although not referred to as sand casting
cleaners, employees performing many of the aforesaid operations have
been included in appropriate units of foundry employees.5' In addition
thereto, the record discloses that while sand casting cleaners were ap-
parently at one time covered by plant-wide agreements,6 they have
been included in the foundry unit under agreements between the Com-
pany and the Molders since June 16, 1943. In view of the close
relationship between sand casting cleaners and the recognized foundry
3 The foundry unit, aside from the categories presently in dispute, has for many years been
represented by the Molders under a series of collective bargaining agreements
The foundry
unit as such, is distinct from a further unit of the Company 's production and maintenance
employees at its Nassau plant, which unit is currently represented by the UE as the result
of a certification by the Board following a consent election .
See Decision and Certification
( 2-R-3666 ) issued January 7, 1943.
4 Sand casting cleaners who are thus rotated remain unchanged with respect to super-
vision, rate of pay, and general location of work.
5 See Matter of Rosedale Foundry & Machine Company , 35 N. L R B . 1 ; Matter of Red
Jacket Manufacturing Company, 36 N. L. R. B 932 ; Matter of Vilter Manufacturing Com-
pany, 44 N. L. R. B. 232; Matter of Eagle Iron Works, 46 N L. R. B. 1451 ; and Matter of
Bovaird & Seyfang Manufacturing Company, 47 N. L. it. B. 1240.
-
6Although not specifically mentioned therein, sand casting cleaners
are apparently
included under earlier contracts between the Company and other labor organizations
covering all hourly paid employees.
348
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
classifications, together with the general practice of including in
foundry units employees performing the functions of sand casting
cleaners, and particularly in the light of the recent history of collective
bargaining between the Company and the Molders,7 we find that sand
casting cleaners are properly a part of the unit of foundry employees.
Accordingly, we shall include them in the foundry unit hereinafter
found appropriate.
With respect to the groups of employees known as die casting
cleaners and die casting machine operators, it appears that these em-
ployees either perform machine operations or do work closely related
to that of machine employees.8
While die casting machine operators
produce castings, their work is to operate electrically controlled
hydraulic die casting machines and is unlike that of the molders,
whose production of sand castings by hand methods in contrast with
the machine output of the -die casting machine operators, depends
upon the skill of the individual molder. Included in the work of die
casting machine operators is the setting of dies which are kept in
repair by foundry machinists whom all parties agreed should be ex-
cluded from the unit of foundry employees. Insofar as the die cast-
ing cleaners are concerned, the record reveals that these employees
occupy, with respect to the die casting machine operators, a position
similar to that of the sand casting cleaners in relation to the molders
herein-above referred it.
Die casting cleaners trim the smaller and
lighter machine-made castings of the die casting machine operators
and work with small bench tools, performing relatively less skilled
operations closely resembling those of the machine workers employed
in the factory area and included in the production and maintenance
unit.
In addition thereto, the evidence discloses that die casting
cleaners and the die casting machine operators will, in all probability,
soon be transferred from the temporary quarters which they now
occupy in the foundry, to the machine shop area of the factory in the
main building of the plant.9
At the hearing, the Molders stated that
it claimed die casting cleaners and die casting machine operators only
so long as these classifications remained in their present foundry
location.
Under the circumstances, we find that the die casting clean-
ers and the die casting machine operators have interests more closely
related to those of the machinists in the production and maintenance
7 See Matter of Sacramento Publishing Company, Ltd, 57 N. L. R B 1636.
8 Machine employees are presently included in the production and maintenance unit
represented by the UE.
U The Company indicated at the hearing that it would begin the physical transfer of die
casting cleaners and die casting machine operators to the main building prior to January
1, 1945.
While we have since been advised by the Regional Office that such transfer has
as yet not been commenced due to the fact that the space which these employees will
occupy requires additional work before it can be used , according to the present estimate
of the Company, the actual transfer of these employee classifications and their equipment
will begin on February 15, 1945, and will be completed by March 1, 1945.
SPERRY GYROSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
349
unit than to the interests of the employees comprising the unit of
foundry classifications.
Accordingly, we shall at this time exclude
die casting cleaners and die casting machine operators from the unit
of foundry employees hereinafter found appropriate.
However, our
determination in this respect will be subject to reexamination in the
event that the contemplated transfer of these employees is not effected
within a reasonable time following the issuance of the present
decision.
There remains for consideration the questions concerning the dis-
position of foundry laborers and the inclusion or exclusion of leaders
among the foundry and fringe group classifications.
With regard to foundry laborers, the Company and the Molders
are agreed that foundry laborers generally should be included in the
unit of foundry employees.
On the other hand, the UE contends that
foundry laborers customarily working with classifications excluded
from the foundry unit should similarly be excluded therefrom.
The record reveals that, while a few laborers are at present regu-
larly assigned to the functions of rough inspection and heat treating,10
it is not possible in other instances to determine which laborers are
regularly assigned to specific types of operations in the foundry for
the reason that laborers as a group rotate from one foundry classi-
fication to another and frequently assist several different groups in a
single day, according to the needs of the particular group. In addi-
tion thereto, it appears that all laborers in the foundry, i herever
located, report to a laborer leader who maintains a foundry labor pool
from which laborers are assigned to various 'working groups.
The
Company, stated at the hearing that foundry laborers would not be
affected by the contemplated transfer of die casting cleaners and die
casting machine operators to the main building.
Foundry laborers
as a group have generally been included without distinction in appro-
priate emits of foundry employees.',
We find that all the foundry
laborers herein concerned have substantial interests in common with
those of the usual foundry classifications.
We shall, accordingly,
include them in the foundry unit hereinafter found appropriate.
With respect to the question of the inclusion or exclusion of leaders,
the unions contend, in opposition to the Company, that leaders in the
foundry should be included within the unit. The Company maintains
that while the title of leader does not by itself confer supervisory
authority,12 employees who are leaders in the foundry have authority
10 There is no dispute among the parties with respect to the inclusion of these recognized
foundry occupations
11,6e in addition to cases cited in footnote No 5, the following • Matter of Davenport
Realer Corporation, 39 N L. R B. 1174; Matter of National Bearing Metals Corporation,
48NLRB41S
12 The Company admits that numerous leaders within factory classifications have no
substantial supervisory authority.
350,
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
to make effective recommendations with respect to the status of em-
ployees and should therefore be excluded from any' unit found appro-
priate in the present proceeding.
The unions, on the other hand,
claim that such leaders have no substantial supervisory authority and
also that they have been included under recent contracts between the
Molders and the Company. However, while several witnesses testified
as to the amount of supervision exercised by leaders over foundry
employees, they failed to refute the evidence offered by the Com-
pany to the effect that foundry leaders have effective power of recom-
mendation with respect to the status of such foundry employees.13
In addition thereto, it appears that such leaders, whose hourly rate
is at least 10 percent higher than that paid to the general workers,
spend practically all their time supervising, and do no manual labor
except in connection with the instruction of employees.
Under the
circumstances, and despite the fact that foundry leaders have been
the subject of collective bargaining between the Molders and the
Company '14 we find that all leaders in the foundry are supervisory
employees within the meaning of our usual definition.
We shall,
accordingly, exclude them from the unit of foundry employees herein
after found appropriate.
We find that all employees of the Company's foundry at its Nassau
plant under the jurisdiction of the general foundry foreman, includ-
ing sand casting cleaners and foundry laborers, but excluding the cut-
ter sharpener, inspectors first class, inspectors second class, U. R. W.
inspectors, machinists first class, machinists, machinists' helpers,
maintenance men first class, maintenance men second class, porters,
stock clerks, tool makers first class, tool makers second class, trades
helpers, welders, cafeteria employees, guards, timekeepers, clerical em-
ployees, production control employees, die casting cleaners, die casting
machine operators, leaders, and all other supervisory employees with
authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect
changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such
action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective
bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION O1 REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-
roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec-
13 Foundry leaders are consulted by higher supervisory employees to determine whether
a worker merits an increase In pay upon periodic rate reviews.
14 The Company stated at the hearing that the inclusion of foundry leaders under its
contracts with the Molders had been effected over its protest.
SPERRY GYROSCOPE
COMPANY, IN C.
351
tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the
Direction.
The UE requests that it may appear on the ballot as "UE-CIO,
Local 450, United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America,
CIO." The request is hereby granted.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION .
By virtue'of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Sperry Gyroscope
Company, Inc., Great Neck, Long Island, New York, an election by
secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible , but not later than
thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction
and supervision of the Regional Director for the Second Region,
acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board,
and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regu-
lations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section
IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately
preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not
work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation
or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of
the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but
excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged
for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date
of the election , to determine whether they desire to be represented by
Local 87, International Molders & Foundry Workers Union of North
America, A. F. of L., or by UE-CIO, Local 450, United Electrical,
Radio & Machine Workers of America, CIO , for the purposes of col-
lective bargaining , or by neither.