081 NLRB 328
Veeder-Root Inc.
In the Matter Of VEEDER-ROOT INCORPORATED , EMPLOYER and ROBERT
H. HICKEY, EMPLOYEE, PETITIONER and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIA-
TION OF MACHINISTS, CAPITOL CITY LODGE No. 354, DISTRICT 26,
UNION
Case No. 1-RD-28
SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION
AND
ORDER
January 26, 1949
On November 29, 1948, the Board issued its Decision and Direction
of Election 1 in this proceeding, directing a decertification election
among the employees in the unit found appropriate.
The Union, the
only labor organization involved in this proceeding, had been certified
by the Board in December 1945 as the bargaining representative of
employees of the Employer following a consent election.
On De-
cember 13, 1948, the Union advised the Board that it no longer claimed
to represent the employees in the unit in question.2
The Union's disavowal of any claim to represent the employees
eliminates the question concerning representation which the Board
found to exist in its Decision and Direction of Election.
Under the
present state of facts, no claim for recognition is being advanced by
any individual or labor organization.
There can be no "question"
concerning representation when the Union concedes the very thing that
the Petitioner seeks to establish.'
We regard the Union's withdrawal as a disclaimer of its status as
exclusive bargaining representative of the employees in the unit, and
a relinquishment of any surviving rights as such representative under
the 1945 certification.
We find that whatever vitality the certificate
'80 N. L. R. B. 851
2 The Union 's letter to the Regional Director reads in part as follows :
"We have recently made a very careful check of these employees and find that a large
number have changed the position that they had in reference to organization at the time
of the Board hearing.
Since we no longer represent a majority of the employees involved,
we withdraw any claim we may have had in the past to represent these employees."
' Matter of Federal Shipbuilding and Drydoek Company, 77 N. L. R. B. 463.
81 N. L. R. B., No. 56.
328
VEEDER-ROOT INCORPORATED
329
might otherwise still have to establish the Union's representative status
is necessarily cancelled by the Union's own disclaimer.
Accordingly, we find that no question affecting commerce exists
concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within
the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the
Act.
We shall, therefore, set aside the Direction of Election and
dismiss the petition.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Direction of Election issued herein
on November 29, 1948, be, and it hereby is, set aside, and that the pe-
tition for decertification of representatives of employees of Veeder-
Root Incorporated, Hartford, Connecticut, filed herein by Robert H.
Hickey, be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
MEMBERS REYNOLDS and GRAY took no part in the consideration of
the above Supplemental Decision and Order.