088 NLRB 8
Squire's Inc.
In the Matter of SQUIRE'S, INC., EMPLOYER and AMALGAMATED RETAIL
AND DEPARTMENT STORE EMPLOYEES UNION, AFFILIATED WITH
AMALGAMATED
CLOTHING
WORKERS OF AMERICA,
C.
I.
0.,
PETITIONER 1
Case No. 21-RC-883.-Decided January 6, 1950
DECISION
AND
ORDER
Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before Jack R. Berger,
hearing officer.
At the hearing, the Employer moved to dismiss the
petition upon the ground that the Employer is not engaged in com-
merce within the meaning of the Act.
For the reasons given below,
the motion is hereby granted.
The hearing officer's rulings made at
the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board finds :
The business of the Employer
The Employer, a California corporation, operates three retail men's
clothing stores, one each in Los Angeles, Hollywood, and Beverly
Hills, California.
During the 6-month period ending June 30, 1949,
the Employer made purchases in the amount of $203,000, of which
about 80 percent was shipped to the stores from outside California.
During the same period, sales amounted to about $310,000, of which
less than 1 percent was shipped outside the State.
The operation of a small local chain of retail clothing stores such as
is involved in this case is essentially local in character. - We therefore
find that, while the Employer's operations are not wholly unrelated to
commerce, they are essentially local in character, and consequently it
will not effectuate the policies of the Act to assert jurisdiction over
the Employer.2
Accordingly, we shall dismiss the petition.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition filed herein be, and it hereby
is, dismissed.
1 The names of the parties appear as amended at the hearing.
' Holeston Drug Company, 82 NLRB 1264 ; Jacobs Pharmacy Co., 87 NLRB 309; Tom
Thumb Stores , 87 NLRB 1062 ; Sta-Kleen Bakery, 78 NLRB 798 ; Harris Baking Company,
79 NLRB 77 .
To the extent that the King Brooks case ( 84 NLRB 652 ) is inconsistent with
this decision , it is hereby overruled.
88 NLRB No. 2.
8