W. T. Carter and Brother

In the Matter of W. T. CARTER AND BROTHER, A PARTNERSHIP COM- POSED OF : A. L. CARTER ; FRANKIE CARROLL BULLINGTON ; MARY CARROLL IKEMPNER; LENA CARTER CARROLL ANDERSON; DOROTHY TAYLOR AND GERTRUDE TAYLOR OTTo, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRICES OF THE ESTATE OF JESSIE CARTER TAYLOR; AGNESE CARTER NELMS; AGNESE CARTER NELMS, TRUSTEE FOR HAYWOOD NELMS, JR. ; AGNESE CARTER NELMS, TRUSTEE FOR AGNESE CARTER NELMS (HER DAUGII'rER) ; AGNESE CARTER NELMS, TRUSTEE FOR NANCY CARTER NELMS ; FRANKIE CARTER RANDOLPH ; FRANKIE CARTER RANDOLPH AND HUSBAND, R. D. RANDOLPH, CO- TRUSTEES FOR MRS. AUBREY RANDOLPH SCOTT; FRANKIE CARTER RANDOLPH AND HUSBAND, R. D. RANDOLPI, CO-TRUSTEES FOR MRS. JEAN RANDOLPH LONGMAID; LENA CARTER CARROLL; AUBREY L. CAR- TER, TRUSTEE FOR AUBREY L. CARTER, JR.; AUBREY L. CARTER, TRUSTEE FOR THOMAS L. CARTER; W. T. CARTER, JR., A. L. CARTER, AND J. WINSTON CARTER, TRUSTEES UNDER INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY ERNEST ANDERSON CARTER AND MARTHA CATON CARTER APRIL 4, 19 2 8 ; MRS. FLORENCE TIIOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND BYRON J. THOMAS, CARROLL C. THOMAS, PEYTON F. THOMAS, AND TAYLOR W. THOMAS, AS INDE- PENDENT EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES UNDER THE LAST WILL OF JACK THOMAS, DECEASED ; W. T. CARTER, JR. ; W. T. CARTER, III ; VICTOR N. CARTER and INTERNATIONAL WOODWORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO Case No. 16-CA-82 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND ORDER October 11, 19510 On August 22, 1950, the Board issued its Decision and Order 1 in this case, finding that the Respondents had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, and directing that the Respondents cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action. On September 5, 1950, the Respondents filed a Motion for Rehearing, in which they request a clarification of footnote 2 of the Decision and Order, and in which they also request that the Board reconsider the entire Decision and Order and. dismiss the complaint. 1 90 NLRB 2020. 91 NLRB No. 146. 911 912 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD The Respondents' request for a clarification of footnote 2 of the Decision and Order is granted by amending said footnote to read as follows : The Respondents' motion to dismiss the complaint, because the parent body of the Union herein was not in compliance with the filing requirements of the Act at the time of the issuance of the complaint (No affidavits were filed by the Congress of Industrial Organizations prior to the date of the issuance of the complaint), is denied. Bethlehem Steel Company, Shipbuilding Division, and Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc., 89 NLRB 341; J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc., 90 NLRB 130. The Respondents' request that the Board reconsider the entire Decision and Order and dismiss the complaint raises no facts or issues not previously considered, and is therefore denied. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Respondents' Motion for Rehearing be, and it hereby is, granted by amending footnote 2 of the Board's Decision and Order as set forth above, and that in all other respects said motion be, and it hereby is, denied. Dated, Was3 irgton, D. C., October 11, 1950. By direction of the Board : FRANK M. KLEILER, Executive Secretary.