061 NLRB 638
T. S. C. Motor Freight Lines
In the Matter of T. S. C. MOTOR FREIGHT LINES and INTERNATIONAL
BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS,
WAREHOUSEMEN &
HELPERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 940, A. F. OF L.
Case No. 16-R-1143.Decided April 20,19445
Rawlings, Sayers & Scurlock, by Mr. Sam R. Sayers, of Fort Worth,
Tex., for the Company.
Mr. G. C. Rickert, of Galveston , Tex., for the Association.
Mr. R. S. Craig, of Houston, Tex., for the Association.
Mr. Louis Cokin, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
ORDER
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon petition duly filed by International Brotherhood of Team-
sters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local 940,
A. F. of L., herein called the Teamsters, alleging that a question affect-
ing commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of
T. S. C. Motor Freight Lines, Galveston, Texas, herein called the Com-
pany, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate
hearing upon due notice before Earl Saunders, Trial Examiner.
Said
hearing was held at Galveston, Texas, on February 20, 1945.
At the
commencement of the hearing, the Trial Examiner granted a motion
of
National Association of Motorized Common Carrier Truck Line
Employees, herein called the Association, to intervene.
The Com-
pany, the Teamsters, and the Association appeared, participated, and
were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-ex-
amine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues.
The
Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prej-
udicial error and are hereby affirmed.
All parties were afforded op-
portunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
T. S. C. Motor Freight Lines is a partnership with its general offices
at Houston, Texas.
The Company is a common carrier and operates
61 N. L. R. B., No 97.
638
T. S. C. MOTOR FREIGHT LINES
639
`under the rules and regulations of the Interstate Commerce Com-
mission.
It operates freight lines between various points in the
State of Texas and from a number of points in the State of Texas to
points in the States of Louisiana and Mississippi.
During the last 6
months of 1944, the Company received in excess of $500,000 in gross
revenues, approximately $175,000 worth of which was derived from in-
terstate shipments.
The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the
meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouse-
men & Helpers of America, Local 940, is a labor organization affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership
employees of the Company.
National Association of Motorized Common Carrier Truck Line
Employees is an unaffiliated labor organization,'admitting to mem-
bership employees of the Company.
III. THE ALLEGED APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Teamsters claims that the appropriate unit should include all
local cartage and dock employees at the Galveston, Texas, terminal
of the Company, with the exception of clerical and supervisory em-
ployees.
The Company and the Association contend that the ap-
propriate unit should be system-wide in scope, including all local
cartage and dock employees at the 12 terminals of the Company in
the States of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, with the exception
of supervisors and clerical employees.
The Company operates 12 terminals in the States of Texas, Mis-
sissippi, and Louisiana, from which it is engaged in delivering and
picking up local freight.
Thereafter, it transports said freight "over
the road" between the various terminals.
All the Company's policies
concerning labor, wages, working conditions, hours of employment,
and similar matters are determined at its head office in Houston,
Texas.
The record discloses that wages and working conditions at
9 of the 12 terminals are identical, while those at the remaining 3
are similar.
The Association has represented the local cartage and
dock employees at all 12 terminals by virtue of system-wide collec-
tive bargaining agreements since 1937.
The Teamsters contends that
the collective bargaining history between the Company and the
Association should not be determinative of the scope of the unit
herein inasmuch as the Association, prior to November 1944 when it
changed its rules in this respect, allegedly did not represent or admit
into membership Negroes employed by the Company.
We find it
640
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
unnecessary to pass upon'this contention inasmuch as our finding below
is predicated upon the extent of organization rather than the past
bargaining history.
Because the operation, management, and organization of a system
of transportation as a single closely integrated enterprise results in
an intimate relationship and interdependence in the work and in-
terests of the employees involved, the Board has generally found the
system-wide unit to be appropriate if organization has proceeded
sufficiently far.'
Since it appears that the entire system of the Company is func-
tionally coherent and closely integrated, and that the Association
has organized the employees of the Company on a system-wide basis,
we find that the unit contended for by the Teamsters is inappropriate
for the purposes of collective bargaining and we shall, therefore, dis-
miss the petition for investigation and certification of representatives
filed by the Teamsters.
IV. THE ALLEGED QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
Since, as stated in Section III, above, we do not find that the unit
alleged in the petition filed by the Teamsters is appropriate, we find
that no question has arisen concerning the representation of em-
ployees of the Company in an appropriate bargaining unit.
ORDER
Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact, the National Labor
Relations Board hereby orders that the petition for investigation
and certification filed by International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local 940,
A. F. of L., be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
CHAIRMAN MILLIS took no part in the consideration of the above
Decision and Order.
1 Matter of ET & WMC Motor Transportation Co., 30 N. L R. B. 505.