062 NLRB 552
Gibson, Inc.
In the Matter of GIBSON , INCORPORATED
and UNITED STEELWORKES OF
AMERICA, C. I. O.
Case No. 7-R--2021.-Decided June 19, 1945
Messrs. Don B Sharpe and J. A. Mazzulla, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for
the Company.
Mr. Charles Cowl, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for the Union.
Mr. Louis Cokin, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon petition duly filed by United Steelworkers of America, C. I. 0.,
herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had
arisen concerning the representation of employees of Gibson, Incorpor-
ated,
Kalamazoo, Michigan, herein called the Company, the National
Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due
'notice before Max Rotenberg, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at
Kalamazoo, Michigan, on May 28, 1945. The Company and the Union
appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard,
to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bear-
ing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are
from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded
opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Gibson, Incorporated, is a Michigan corporation operating a plant at
Kalamazoo, Michigan, where it is engaged in the manufacture of war mate-
rials. The Company semi-annually uses raw materials valued in excess
62 N. L. R. B., No. 77.
552
GIBSON, INCORPORATED
553
of $100,000, about 90 percent"of which is shipped to it from points outside
the State of Michigan. During the same period the Company manufac-
tures products valued in excess of $200,000, approximately 90 percent of
which is shipped to points outside, the State of Michigan.
The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the mean-
ing of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
United Steelworkers of America is a labor organization affiliated with
the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admitting to membership em-
ployees of the Company.
III.
THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Company refuses to recognize the Union as exclusive collective bar-
gaining representative of its employees, asserting a doubt as to its majority
status.
A statement of a Field Examiner of the Board, introduced into evidence
at the hearing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number
of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate.'
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the
representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Sec-
tion 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV.
THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Union urges that all production and maintenance employees of the
Company, including leaders, inspectors, and watchmen, but excluding
office clerical employees, timekeepers, cost estimators, plant-protection em-
ployees, and supervisory employees, constitute an appropriate bargaining
unit. The only controversy with respect to the unit concerns the watch-
men. The Company would exclude them from the unit.
The Company employs four watchmen who make appointed rounds of
the Company's plant, punching A.D.T. clocks. In addition, the watchmen
fire boilers and are responsible for the maintenance of the compressor and
boiler rooms. They are neither deputized nor militarized. We shall in-
chicle them in the unit.
We find that all production and maintenance employees of the Com-
pany, including leaders,' inspectors, and watchmen, but excluding office
clerical employees, timekeepers, cost estimators, plant-protection employ-
ees, and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, dis-
charge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees,
r The Field Examiner reported that the Union presented 154 menibetship application cards. There
ate about 316 employees in the appropri ate unit
The record discloses that the leaders are not supervtsmy employers within the mc.uung of the
Board 's definition of that term.
554
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
or effectively recommend such action , constitute a unit appropriate for the
purposes of collective bargaining , within the meaning of Section 9 (b)
of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representatives which has
arisen be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll
period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein,
subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board 'by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act,
and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board
Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representatives
for the purposes of collective bargaining with Gibson, Incorporated, Kala-
mazoo, Michigan, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early
as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Di-
rection, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for
the Seventh Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor
Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said
Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropri-
ate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period
immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who
did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on
vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed
forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls,
but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and
have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to
determine whether or not they desire to be represented by United Steel-
workers of America, C I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining.