067 NLRB 1037
Wilson & Co., Inc.
In the Matter Of WILSON & COMPANY, INC. and AMALGAMATED MEAT
CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 195,
A. F. OF L.
In the Matter Of WILSON & COMPANY, INC. and AMALGAMATED MEAT
CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, A. F. or L.
Cases Nos. 4-R-1973 and 4-R-1988, respectively .Decided April
30,1946
Mr. Swanson, of Chicago , Ill., for the Company.
dir. Edivard Davis, of Philadelphia , Pa., for the Amalgamated
Unions.
Cllr. Herbert J . Nester, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon petitions duly filed by Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher
Workmen of North America, Local 195, A. F. of L., and by Amalga-
mated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, A. F.
of L., herein collectively called the Amalgamated, alleging that ques-
tions affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of
employees of Wilson & Company, Inc., of Chicago, Illinois, herein
called the Company,, at the two plants of the Company hereinafter
named, the National Labor Relations Board provided for a consoli-
dated hearing upon due notice before Herman Lazarus, Trial Ex-
aminer.
The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on
March 14, 1946.
The Company and the Amalgamated appeared and
participated.
All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard,
to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence
bearing on the issues.
The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hear-
ing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
All
parties were afforded opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
I At the hearing, motion was granted to amend the pleadings to show the correct name
of the Company.
67 N. L R . B., No. 129.
1037
1038
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Wilson & Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal
offices located at Chicago, Illinois, is engaged in purchasing and
slaughtering of livestock and in processing, selling, and distributing
meat and meat products.
The Company operates nine packing plants,
including the two plants concerned herein, the plants at Allentown
and Scranton, Pennsylvania.
At the Allentown plant the Company annually purchases raw mate-
rials valued in excess of $500,000, 60 percent of which originates from
points outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Allentown
plant likewise annually sells and distributes products valued in excess
of $500,000, 3 percent of which is shipped to points outside the Com-
monwealth of Pennsylvania.
At the Scranton plant raw materials purchased annually by the
Company are valued in excess of $500,000, 60 percent of which orig-
inates from points outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
All
products sold and distributed by the Scranton plant, however, are
delivered to points within the limits of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
The Company admits that its Allentown plant is engaged in com-
merce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, but
denies that the Scranton plant comes within the jurisdiction of the
Board.
We find, contrary to the contention of the Company, that
in the operation of both plants, the Company is engaged in commerce
within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.2
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North Amer-
ica, and its Local 195, are labor organizations, affiliated with the
American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees
of the Company.
III. THE QUESTIONS CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Company has refused to recognize the Amalgamated as the
collective bargaining representative of the employees in both its Allen-
town and Scranton plants until certified by the Board in respective
appropriate units.
2 See Matter of Raleigh Coca Cola Bottling Works, 65 N . L. R B. 1010, and cases cited
therein ; Matter of Atlantic Company, 65 N L. It. B. 1274
WILSON & COMPANY, INC.
1039
Statements of a Board agent, introduced in evidence at the hearing,
indicate that both the Amalgamated unions represent a substantial
number of employees in the units claimed to be appropriate .3
We find that questions affecting commerce have arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNITS
A. The Allentown plant (Case No. 4--R-1973)
The parties are in substantial agreement that all production em-
ployees of the Company's Allentown plant, including distribution
employees, but excluding maintenance employees, salesmen, student
salesmen, shipping clerk, truck drivers, office and clerical employees,
foremen, department heads, and all other supervisory employees, con-
stitute the appropriate unit.
The Company, however, would exclude
the assistant foreman in the sausage department, while the Union
would include him.
This employee, Earl Harwick, was formerly the foreman in the
sausage department during the absence of the regular foreman, Paul
Todd, who was absent from the plant in the armed forces.
Upon
Todd's return to employment, Harwick was not demoted by the Com-
pany, but a new job was created for him with the classification of
"assistant foreman."
The record is clear that he exercises joint super-
visory control over other employees in the department; has on several
occasions hired and discharged employees ; and has effected changes
in the status of other employees.
Accordingly, we shall exclude him
from the bargaining unit.
We find that all production employees at the Company's Allentown
plant, including distribution employees, but excluding maintenance
employees, salesmen, student salesmen, shipping clerk, truck drivers,
office and clerical employees, foremen, assistant foreman (sausage
department), department heads, and all other supervisory employees
with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise
effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such
action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective
bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
'The Field Examiner reported that the Amalgamated submitted 17 cards bearing the
names of employees listed on the Allentown pay roll dated January 1946
There are
approximately 19 employees in the appropriate unit al the Allentown plant
The Field Examiner also reported that the Amalgamated submitted 41 cards bearing
the names of employees listed on the pay roll of the Scranton plant dated January 1946.
There are approximately 50 employees in the appropriate unit at the Scranton plant
1040
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
B. The Scranton plant, (Case No. 4-R-1988)
The Amalgamated urges as an appropriate unit in the Scranton
plant all production and maintenance employees, including distribu-
tion employees, working foremen, working foreladies,4 truck drivers,
chauffeur-salesman (also referred to as a peddler salesman), assist-
ant shipping clerk, floor salesman, and the checker, but excluding office
and clerical employees, outside salesmen, foremen, the manager, and
all other supervisory employees with authority to hire and fire.
The
Company is in substantial accord with the composition of the unit re-
quested, but would exclude the chauffeur-salesman (or peddler sales-
man), the floor salesman, the assistant shipping clerk, and the checker.
Chauffeur-Salesman (or peddler salesman)
There is one employee in this classification.
He drives a company-
owned refrigerated truck throughout the district serviced by the
Scranton plant.
He personally loads the truck with meats and meat
products at the Company's plant and travels over routes of his own
choice selling such products from the truck to customers he personally
solicits.
He has 'authority to make collections for all sales and may
extend credit to any of his customers.
He is paid on a straight salary
basis and is responsible directly to the plant manager.
We are of the
opinion that the duties of the chauffeur-salesman are more closely
identified with those of the outside salesman, whom the parties agree
to exclude, than with those of the production and maintenance em-
ployees.
Accordingly, we shall exclude the chauffeur-salesman from
the bargaining unit.
Floor Salesman
There is one employee in this classification.
His duties entail serv-
icing all retail merchants who personally call at the Company's plant
to make their purchases.
This employee merely quotes prices to the
customers, writes up their orders, and forwards the orders to the
billing department.
He has no authority to extend credit, nor is he
responsible for collections.
He does not handle the products sold or
take any part in delivery. It is our opinion that his duties are pri-
marily clerical, and inasmuch as the parties are in accord that clerical
employees should be excluded from the unit, we shall accordingly
exclude the floor salesman.
'Although working foremen and working foreladies were specifically included in the
unit requested by the Amalgamated, the record is clear that neither of these classifications
appear on the pay roll of the Company's Scranton plant.
WILSON & COMPANY, INC.
1041
AesiBtant Shipping Clerk
Although this employee is paid substantially the same salary as
other employees in the shipping department, he exercises joint super-
visory authority with the shipping clerk over the other employees.
The record is clear that he is responsible for discipline in this depart-
ment and has, on numerous past occasions, hired, discharged, and
effected changes in the status of employees in the shipping department.
Accordingly, we shall exclude him from the unit.
Checker
There is one employee in this classification.
His duties involve
checking all invoices against the merchandise sold to the retail mer-
chants by the floor salesman in the plant.
He is required to determine
that proper charges are made for all products sold, and that all orders
are properly filled and designated for the correct customers.
We are
of the opinion that the checker is a clerical employee and we shall,
therefore, exclude him from the unit.
We find that all production and maintenance employees at the Com-
pany's Scranton plant, including distribution employees and truck
drivers, but excluding all office and clerical employees, salesmen,
chauffeur-salesman, floor salesman, the checker, the shipping clerk,
the assistant shipping clerk, foremen, assistant foreman, the manager
and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote,
discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the.status of em-
ployees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appro-
priate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of
Section 9 (b) of the Act.
V.
THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the questions concerning representation which
have arisen be resolved by separate elections by secret ballot among
employees in the respective appropriate units who were employed
during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this
Decision and Direction of Elections, subject to the limitations and
additions set forth in the Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act
and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby
692148-46-vol 67-67
1042
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Wilson & Com-
pany, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, separate elections by secret ballot shall be
conducted as early as possible but not later than thirty (30) days from
the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the
Regional Director for the Fourth Region, acting in this matter as
agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article
III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among em-
ployees in the respective units found appropriate in Section IV,
above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately
preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not
work during the said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vaca-
tion or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed
forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the
polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been dis-
charged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the
date of the elections, (1) to determine whether or not the employees of
the production unit of the Allentown plant described in Section IV,
above, desire to be represented by Amalgamated Meat Cutters and
Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 195, A. F. of L., for the
purposes of collective bargaining; (2) to determine whether or not the
employees of the production and maintenance unit of the Scranton
plant described in Section IV, above, desire to be represented by the
Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America,
A. F. of L., for the purposes of collective bargaining.