094 NLRB 105
Hanna Motor Co.
HANNA MOTOR'COMPANY
105
We find that all' of the employees in the Employer's program de-
partment, excluding the TV directors and the program assistant who
acts in the capacity of a director, the art editor, the film editor, and
an supervisors as defined in the Act, constitute a unit appropriate
for'the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Sec-
tion 9 (b) of the Act.
5. The Employer contends that the petition in this case is premature
because of the prospective expansion of the 'program department.
The Employer contemplated hiring six employees immediately after
the' hearing with a possibility of further expansion at a later date, if
plans' for increa'sed programming materialize.
However, the record '
shows that the present complement of the program department cori-
stitutes`a substantial and essentially representative proportion-of the
expected full complement of the program department 1O
Under these"
circumstances we see no reason for departing from our'usual policy
of-directing an `immediate election.1' '
[Text of Direction of Election 'omitted from 'publication in this
volume.]
10 This is true particularly in view of the fact that the contemplated addition of six
employees presumably will have been completed prior to the election.
11 Cf. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 87 NLRB'463.
MANNA MOTOR COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHIN-
ISTS, PETITIONER.
Case No. 10-RC-1268.
April 30, 1951
Decision and Direction of Election
Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 '(c) of the National Labor
Relations Act, 'a hearing was held before J: S. Patton, hearing officer.
The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from preju-
dicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board has
delegated its powers in 'connection with this case to a three-member
panel' [Chairthan Herzog'and Member's Murdock and Styles].
Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds :
1. The Employer, 'an Alabama, corporation, is engaged in the sale'
arid' servicing 'of neiv and used automobiles and trucks.
The sales of
new'automobiles and trucks is made under an exclusive sales agree-
ment granted to the Einp]oyer by the'Ford Motor Company.
During
the calendar year' 1950 the Employer made purchases in excess of
$1,400,000.
Over $1,100,000 of this amount was shipped to the Em-
ployer from points outside the State of Alabama.' Onthe basis of the
foregoing facts we- find that the Employer is engaged in commerce
94 NLRB No. 29.
106
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
within the meaning of the Act, and that it will effectuate the policies of
the Act to assert jurisdiction in this case.'
2. The Petitioner is a labor organization claiming to represent cer-
tain employees of the Employer.
3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa-
tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9
(c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
4. The Petitioner seeks to represent all of the Employer's automo-
tive mechanics, body repairmen, helpers, washers, tire changers, greas-
ers, porters, and laborers, excluding all technicians, professional
employees, office and clerical employees, guards, watchmen, all other
-employees, and all executives and supervisors, as defined in the Act.
Except for a used car lot, the Employer's plant is contained in one
building which consists of a showroom, offices, parts department, and
service department.
The Employer's operations are divided admin-
istratively into departments, each under the supervision of a depart-
ment manager.
Some of the mechanics, body men, and laborers sought
by the Petitioner are employed in the service department under the
immediate supervision of a foreman who works under the service
department manager, and the remainder of the mechanics and laborers
sought are employed in the new and used car conditioning department,
under its manager.
The Employer desires to include in the unit, in
addition to those employees sought by the Petitioner, the service sales-
men who work under the service department manager, the parts
department employees who work under the parts department manager,
the service department clerical employees who work mostly under the
service department manager, and the salesmen and front office clerical
employees.
The parts department employees.-The parts department is located
behind a partition adjacent to the service department.
There is a
large window opening from the parts department into the service
department, through which the mechanics and their helpers obtain
parts from the 10 parts department employees.
All of the parts de-
partment employees spend some of their time in handling parts at the
'window where they have contact with the service department mechan-
ics and helpers.
However, some of them spend less time in doing this
work than others.
Several of the employees, when not at the parts
window, perform clerical duties such as posting invoices, making out
parts tickets, cashiering, making deliveries, putting parts into their
proper places, keeping stock records and inventories, and helping to
take physical inventories.
About 50 percent of the parts disposed of
by the Employer is sold directly to the public.
The other 50 percent
is delivered to the mechanics from the parts department and is installed
' Hauser Nash. Sales, Inc., 92 NLRB 531; Baxter Bros., 91 NLRB 1480.
HANNA MOTOR
COMPANY
107
in automobiles and trucks in the service department.
The parts
department employees, although paid in a different manner from some
of the service department employees, receive approximately the same
pay as most of the service department employees.2
The parts depart-
ment employees enjoy the same vacations, hospitalization, sickness,
and death benefits as the service department employees.
From the foregoing facts, we find that the parts department em-
ployees work in a related department to the service department and
have substantial interests in common with the service department
employees.
We shall therefore include all of the parts department
employees in the unit herein found to be appropriate.'
.Salesmen.-The Employer desires to include the 14 salesmen it em-
ploys in its sales department.
With the exception of 2 salesmen, one
of whom spends approximately 40 percent of his time in display work,
and the other of whom spends approximately 70 percent of his time in
repossessing automobiles, the salesmen perform no duties other than
selling.
Because there is no apparent reason for our departing from
the usual Board policy of excluding salesmen from units of service and
parts department employees, we shall exclude the salesmen from the
unit 4
Service salesmen.-The Employer has four service salesmen in the
service department.
These men receive automobiles that are brought
into the department for repairs, talk to the customers regarding what
repairs are here necessary, and prepare order blanks for the repairs.
The service salesmen deliver the orders to the shop foreman who
assigns the work to a particular mechanic.
The service salesmen,
under the supervision of the service department manager, spend al-
most all of their time in the service department.
Their salary is
based, in part, on the amount of labor which they sell to customers.
The repair mechanics are paid solely on a commission based on the
amount of their labor which is sold to customers. It appears, there-
fore, that the service salesmen are an integral part of the service de-
partment with substantial interests in common with the other service
2 The laborers in the service department , such as the tire changers , car washers, and
porters, receive considerably less than the mechanics , service salesmen, plant clericals,
and body repairmen who earn approximately the same amount as the parts department
employees.
$Harrys Cadillac-Pontiac Company,
Incorporated,
81
NLRB 1;
Valley
Truck and
Tractor Co., 80 NLRB 444; Harry Brown Motor Company, 86 NLRB 652. The parts
department employees who, in addition to handling parts at the parts window , perform
clerical duties , do so only in connection with the parts department .
They are located
in the parts department and work together with the other parts department employees.
Because they have substantially the same interests as the other employees in the unit, we
shall also include them in the unit.
Cf. Public Motors Co , 90 NLRB No 273; Public
Service Company of Indiana, Inc, 89 NLRB 1253 ; Earl McMillian, Inc, 90 NLRB No. 250.
6 Cf. Recht-Froelich Chevrolet Company, 92 NLRB No. 228.
Inasmuch as the salesmen
who perform duties other than selling
,do not work with the employees included in the
unit and have little interest in common with them, they too are excluded from the unit.
108
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
department' employees sought 'by' the' Petitioner. - Accordingly; ,we,
shall include the service salesmen in,the unit found' appropriate.'
Se'rvice' department' clerical employee's.-The' Employer, has five
clerical employees I working in connection with its service department.
These employees perform such duties as keeping journals which show
sales of grease, oil, parts; and accessories,, keeping monthly records
of service sales, checking repair orders for accuracy before returning
vehicles to customers, and keeping records of commissions' earned by
the' mechanics and service salesmen.' • Th'ese employees also receive
incoming telephone orders for service and parts, make out time cards,,;,
and in general perform all 6f, the clerical duties which arise-in con-"
nection with'the service department:'
Apparently all of these clericals
are located in the -service- department area and' work, in. close' ,contact '
with the' other' employees of the' service. department.
Th`ey' are; in,
general, supervised - by the service' 'department' manager; ' although
two' of them -also 'fall under the jurisdiction of 'other supervisors.
Oii' the basis of the foregoing' facts we, believe that the service de-
partment clerical 'employees possess'=a substantial 'community of 'in-,
terests' with' the other employees in the unit 'found' appropriate, and
we shall therefore include them in the unit.'
O f ce clerical emap'lo fees' and telephone operator.-The
The, Einpioyer
desires the inclusion 'of its office 'secretary, head- bookkeeper; and,-its
sales' department invoice'clerk:' Apparently' all of these employees -
are 'located' in 'the Employer's ' offices and have little or no contact
with 'the' service department or parts 'department employees.' The
telephone operator, under-the supervision of 'the office manager, per-'
forms the'usual 'duties of such an employee, -except that she apparently
performs a small amount of work in 'connection with 'the taking of
inventories.
There appears to be no 'reason''for departing 'from the'
Board's usual'policy 'of excluding.'office'clericals and telephone.oper- '
ators' from''units of manual workers and we shall therefore exclude
these employees from the-unit.'
We find -that all mechanics,' body repairmen, helpers; washers,
tire changers, greasers, porters, laborers, service salesmen, service
department clericals, and, parts. department. employees of the Em-
Cf. Public Motors Cc , 90 NLRB No. 273.
e Designated'by the Employer as' numbers (13,44,t 17, 48,'and 19.
Cf.
Public' Motors''Co, supra; Reeht:Froelich" Chevrolet Company, supra; Bart
McMillian, Inc,"supra:
8Cf• Southern Desk Company, 92 NLRB No. 11371; The,Procter & Gamble ;Manufacturing,
Co, 92 NLRB No. 130.
9 Including employee Vann, a mechanic in'the'new'and used air-conditioning. department:
This employee spends about 92 percent"of his time in ,doing' mechanics work' and about
8 percent of his'time in relaying orders'from,the' department head. ' He Chas ono authority
to' hire, discharge, or discipline any-'emplo'ee-or: effectively' to 'recommend such action.
On'rthese' facts 'we "find that'. this man"is . merelyi'a lead 'man rand, not a supervisor as%
defined in'the Act.
WHEATLAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
109
ployer, excluding all salesmen, office clericals, the telephone oper-
ator, technicians, professional employees, guards, watchmen, and
all executives and supervisors as defined in the Act, constitute a unit
appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the mean-
ing of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
[Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication in this
volume.] .
WHEATLAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. and INTERNATIONAL UNION
OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL No. 646, AFL, PETITIONER.
Case
No. 17-RC-932. April 30, 1951
Decision and Direction of Election
Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National
Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before William J. Scott, hear-
ing officer.
The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free
from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board
has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member
panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Reynolds and Murdock].
Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds :
1. The Employer is a Kansas corporation with its principal place of
business located at Scott City, Kansas. It is financed by the Rural
Electrification Administration and is engaged in the production and
distribution of electric power to its approximately 2,900 members'
The Employer generates its own electricity and during the year
1950 it sold and distributed electricity to its members in an amount
exceeding $382,000 in value, part of which was purchased by com-
mercial users engaged in commerce and the rest by rural consumers.
The Employer is in the process of constructing 900 miles of power
lines and a new generating plant which when completed will cost in
the neighborhood of $1,500,000.
The materials used in this construc-
tion are, in large part, shipped to the Employer from points outside
the State of Kansas.
During 1950, the Employer also purchased
miscellaneous supplies, some of which were received from points
outside the State of Kansas.
Contrary to the Employer's contention, we find on these facts that
the Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act.2
1 All these members live in Wichita, Greeley, Scott, Kearny, and Hamilton counties,
Kansas.
' Plymouth Electric Cooperative Association, 92 NLRB 1183
(and cases cited therein).
94 NLRB No. 21.