072 NLRB 344
General Shale Products Corp.
In the Matter of GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS CORP., EMPLOYER and
UNITED STONE AND ALLIED PRODUCTS WORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO5
PETITIONER
Case No. 10-R--21148.-Decided January 29, 194'7
Kelly, Penn d Hunter, by Mr. E. G. Hunter, of Kingsport, Tenn.,
for the Employer.
Mr. Melville Kress, of Knoxville, Tenn., and Messrs. G. G. Mitchell
and J. B. Foreman, of Kingsport, Tenn., for the Petitioner.
Mr. Thomas Davis, of Johnson City, Tenn., for the Intervenor.
Mr. Samuel G. Hamilton, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Kings-
port, Tennessee, on October 25, 1946, before Clifford L. Hardy, hear-
ing officer.
At the hearing the Intervenor moved to dismiss the peti-
tion and the hearing officer referred this motion to the Board for
disposition.
For reasons set forth in Section III, infra, the motion is
denied.
The Petitioner's motion to exclude the Intervenor from the
ballot in any election directed by the Board was also referred to the
Board for ruling by the hearing officer. This motion is also denied for
reasons set forth in Section V, infra.
The hearing officer's rulings
made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby
affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations
Board makes the following:
-
FINDINGS OF FACT
I.
THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER
Ueneral Shale Products Corp., a Delaware corporation, is engaged
in the manufacture of building brick and cinder blocks at its Kings-
port, Tennessee, plant.
The raw materials used by the Employer are
shale, cinders, and cement.
The Employer quarries shale, and pur-
chases cinders and cement, within the State of Tennessee.
Annually,
72N L R B,No 64
344
GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS CORP.
345
the Employer ships in excess of $50,000 worth of finished products,
of which more than 30 percent is shipped to points outside the State.
The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce
within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress
of Industrial Organizations, claiming to represent employees of the
Employer.
United Construction Workers, United Mine Workers of America,
herein called the Intervenor, is a labor organization affiliated with the
American Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of
the Employer.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
Continuous contractual relations have existed between the Employer
and the Intervenor since July 14, 1942, the effective date of a contract
entered into by them.
This contract contained the following termina-
tion clause:
This agreement" shall be effective until October 1, 1943, and
from year to year thereafter, unless at least thirty (30) days prior
to any annual expiration date either party hereto shall notify the
other in writing of its decision to amend, modify or terminate this
agreement.
The employer may notify the Union in writing
thirty (30) days prior to any annual expiration date that the
majority status of the Union is in question, in which case the
Union must prove its majority.
On or about August 21, 1946, the Petitioner addressed a letter to
the Employer requesting recognition as the exclusive bargaining
representative of certain of its employees.
The Employer refused to
grant such recognition until the Petitioner had been certified by the
Board in an appropriate unit.
On August 26, 1946, the petition
herein was filed by the Petitioner.
On September 5, 1946, the Inter-
venor requested a meeting with the Employer to negotiate a new
contract.
On September 10, 1946, the Employer advised the Inter-
venor of the the claim of the Petitioner for recognition and of the
futility of meeting to discuss the subject matter of a new contract until
the Board had passed on the question of representation.
Inasmuch as the Petitioner filed its petition before the operative
date of the automatic renewal clause in the 1942 agreement, it is clear
that the 1942 contract does not preclude a current determination of
346
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
representatives.'
Nor is there any other reason for withholding a
direction of election.-
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Petitioner seeks a unit consisting of all production and main-
tenance employees of the Employer, including brick masons, but ex-
cluding office, clerical, technical, and supervisory employees.
The
Employer and the Intervenor agree with the position of the Petitioner,
except that they would exclude brick masons.
Brick Masons: The Employer at present employs only one brick
mason.3
He is engaged exclusively in the repair of brick kilns and
stacks.
For approximately 20 years all brick masons have been lured
through a local of the Brick Layers, Masons and Plasterers Inter-
national Union of America, AFL, and for the past 4 years all brick
masons have been bargained for by this local.
Brick masons have
not been considered as covered by the contract between the Employer
and the Intervenor. In these circumstances, we shall exclude all
brick masons from the appropriate bargaining unit.
We find that all production and maintenance employees of the Em-
ployer at its Kingsport, Tennessee, plant, excluding brick masons,
office, clerical, and technical employees, and all supervisory employees
with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise
effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such
action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bar-
gaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
v. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot, subject to the
limitations and additions set forth in the Direction.
The Petitioner contends that the Intervenor has not shown sufficient
interest in this proceeding to be allowed a place on the ballot.
How-
ever, we are satisfied that the showing of interest of the Intervenor
by reason of its submission of authorization cards at the hearing, war-
rants its participation in the election.
1 See Matter of Ste Genevieve Lime d Quarry company, 70 N. L
R. B. 1259 , Matter
of Drmjden Rubber company , 71 N L R B 572.
-Contrary to the Intervenor's contention, these is no requirement that a petition be
filed within 10 days following the service of notice by one of the contracting parties of a
desire to reopen the contract or within 10 days following the anniversary date of the
contract.
3 Sturgeon Leonard.
GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS CORP.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
347
As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pur-
poses of collective bargaining with General Shale Products Corp.,
Kingsport, Tennessee, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as
early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of
this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional
Director for the Tenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the
National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and
203.56, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-
Series 4, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Sec-
tion IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period im-
mediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees
who did not work during s iid pay-roll period because they were-ill or
on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the
armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at
the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been dis-
charged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the
date of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented
by United Stone and Allied Products Workers of America, CIO, or by
United Construction Workers, UMWA, for the purposes of collective
bargaining, or by neither.