107 NLRB 348
S. G. Adams Co.
348
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
AFL, or any other labor organization, except to the extent that this right may be affected
by an agreement in conformity with Section 8 (a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act.
AMERICAN COIN LOCK COMPANY, INC.,
Employer.
Dated ... ....
By
(Representative)
(Title)
This notice must remain posted for 60 days from the date hereof, and must not be altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material.
S.
G.
ADAMS COMPANY and UNITED STEELWORKERS OF
AMERICA, CIO, Petitioner . Case No. 14 -RC-2370. December
15, 1953
DECISION AND ORDER
Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National
Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before John M.
Schobel, hearing officer. The hearing officer 's rulings made
at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby
affirmed.
Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds:
1.
The Employer is engaged in commerce within the mean-
ing of the Act.
2.
The Petitioner and District No. 9, International Associa-
tion of Machinists, AFL, the Intervenor, are labor organiza-
tions claiming to represent certain employees of the Employer.
3.
No question affecting commerce exists concerning the
representation of employees of the Employer within the mean-
ing of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act for
the following reasons:
The
Employer
is
engaged in the manufacture of metal
specialty products to the order and specifications of its cus-
tomers. Its
main plant is located at St. Louis, Missouri. In
April 1953 the Employer began operations at a second plant at
Barnhart, about 25 miles distant from its main plant. The
Petitioner and the Intervenor each seeks to represent produc-
tion and maintenance employees at the Barnhart plant.
Present operations at the Barnhart plant are on a partial
scale, and consist principally of a training program, under
which some overflow work from the St. Louis plant is being
handled to relieve congestion at the older plant and afford
training opportunities at the new location. Meanwhile, the
Barnhart plant is undergoing extensive renovation; and per-
manent electrical systems for adequate power and light, and
heating units, and other necessary facilities and equipment are
being planned, ordered, or installed. This work will not be
completed for some months.
Employees for the Barnhart plant are locally hired from
time to time. At the date of the hearing there were 28 unclas-
107 NLRB No. 90
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
349
sified production workers at the plant doing the various jobs
assigned to them under the temporary present.working condi-
tions. When renovation and installation work is completed, the
Employer plans to increase the work complement to approxi-
mately 100 employees in 6 to 8 months and to 150 to 200 em-
ployees in about 18 months. The Employer, however, does not
contemplate that the Barnhart plant will operate independently
of the St. Louis plant. So far as the instant record discloses,
employees at the St. Louis plant are not presently represented
by any labor organization.
In view of the expected increase in the number of employees
at the Barnhart plant in the near future, the present training
status of employees at the plant and their lack of work classi-
fication, and the temporary uncertainty and dependent nature
of the plant's present operations, an immediate election among
employees presently working at the Barnhart plant would be
premature.' Furthermore, it does not clearly appear -that
employees at the Barnhart plant may properly constitute an
appropriate unit apart from employees at the St. Louis plant,
concerning which there is little in the instant record from
which any satisfactory conclusion with respect to the scope of
the appropriate unit for Barnhart plant employees can be drawn.
For these reasons, we dismiss the petition.
[The Board dismissed the petition.]
I Individual Drinking Cup Company; 101 NLRB 1751; A. O. Smith Corporation, 97 NLRB 1570.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
and
INTER-
NATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MA-
CHINE WORKERS, CIO, Petitioner
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
and
INTER-
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, AFL, Peti-
tioner. Cases Nos. 4-RC-2073 and 4-RC-2074. December 15,
1953.
DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION
Upon petitions duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National
Labor Relations Act, a consolidated hearing was held before
Julius
Topol, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings
made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are
hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board finds:
1.
The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning
of the National Labor Relations Act.
2.
The labor organizations named below claim to represent
certain employees of the Employer.
107 NLRB No. 96.
337593 0 - 55 - 24