Sagamore Manufacturing Co.

In the Matter of SAGAMORE MANUFACTURING Co. and TEXTILE WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA (C. 1. 0.) In the Matter Of FALL RIVER COTTON MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION ; BORDER CITY MFG. Co.; RICHARD BORDEN MFG. CO.; ARKWRIGIIT CORPORATION ; SAGAMORE MFG. Co.; BERKSHIRE FINE SPINNING CO.; HOWARD ARTHUR MFG. CO.; PEPPERELL MFG. Co.; LUTHER MFG. CO.';. STEVENS TEXTILE MFG. CO.; AND BOURNE MILLS and* LOOM FIXERS UNION LOCAL #6 (A. F. 'T. 0.) -In the Matter of FALL RIVER COTTON MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION ; BORDER ; CITY MFG. Co; RICHARD BORDEN MFG. Co.; ARKWRIGIIT CORPORATION; SAGAMORE MFG. Co.; BERKSHIRE FINE SPINNING CO.; HOWARD ARTHUR MFG. CO.; PEPPERELL MFG. Co.; LUTHER MFG. Co.; STEVENS TEXTILE MFG. CO.; AND BOURNE MILLS and SLASHER TENDERS LOCAL # 16 (A. F. T. 0.) In the Matter of FALL RIVER COTTON MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION; BORDER CITY MFG. Co; RICHARD BORDEN MFG. Co.; ARKWRIGHT CORPORATION ; SAGAMORE 'MFG. Co.; BERKSHIRE FINE SPINNING CO.; HOWARD - ARTHUR MFG. CO.; PEPPERELL MFG. Co.; LUTHER MFG. CO.; STEVENS TEXTILE MFG. CO.; AND BOURNE MILLS and KNOT- TIERS, DRAWING-IN MACHINE OPERATORS AND WARL' TWISTERS LOCAL #52 (A-F,T.'O.) Cases Nos. B-3500 to R-3503, inclusive, respectively SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND ORDER May 18, 1942 Upon petition for rehearing duly filed by Loom Fixers Union Local #6, Slasher Tenders Local #16, and Knot-Tiers, Drawing-In' Machine Operators and Warp Twisters Local #52, oral argument was held before the Board on May 5, 1942. The Loom Fixers, the Slasher Tenders, the Knot-Tiers, Textile Workers Union of America, and United Textile Workers of America were represented at, and participated therein.' I None of the companies appeared , although served with notice of the argument. 41 N. L. R. B., No. 5. 16 SAGAMORE MANUFACTURING CO. 17 All the contentions advanced at the oral argument were fully con- sidered in our previous Decision. After review, we are of the opinion that the considerations urged at the argument confirm our original findings with respect to the appropriate unit. The petition for rehearing-is therefore denied. 463SU2-42--vol 41-2