166 NLRB 852
The John R. Crocker Co.
852
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
The John R. Crocker Company and Local 782,
United
Association
of Journeymen and Ap-
prentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry
of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, Peti-
tioner. Case 5-RC-5574
July 27,1967
DECISION ON REVIEW, ORDER, AND CER-
TIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVE
BY CHAIRMAN MCCULLOCHAND MEMBERS
BROWN ANDJEIVKINS
Pursuant to a Decision and Direction of Election
issued by the Regional Director for Region 5 of the
National Labor Relations Board, an election was
conducted under his supervision on June 22, 1966,
among the employees in the unit found appro-
priate.' At the conclusion of the election, the
parties were furnished with a tally of ballots which
showed that of approximately 18 eligible voters, 18
cast ballots, of which 9 were for, and 8 against, Peti-
tioner with 1 challenged ballot. Thereafter, the Peti-
tioner filed timely objections to the results of the
election.
As the challenged ballot was determinative of the
results of the election, and as Petitioner had filed
timely objections to the election, the Regional
Director, in accordance with the National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations and State-
ments of Procedure, Series 8, as amended, con-
ducted an investigation and, on September 1, 1966,
issued and served upon the parties his Supplemen-
tal Decision, wherein he overruled, in their entirety,
Petitioner's objections, overruled Petitioner's chal-
lenge to the ballot of Edward L. Pridgen, and
directed that Pridgen's ballot be opened and
counted. Thereafter, on September 20, 1966, Peti-
tioner filed with the Board exceptions to Supple-
mental Decision of the Regional Director, which
the Board construes as a Request for Review. Peti-
tioner's exceptions were limited to the Regional
Director's
determination as to the challenged
ballot.2 On December 5, 1966, the National Labor
Relations Board issued an Order granting Peti-
tioner's request for review and directing that a
hearing be held for the purpose of taking evidence
to resolve the issue raised by the challenge to the
ballot of Pridgen. The Employer then filed a motion
for reconsideration which was opposed by Peti-
tioner and which, on January 6, 1967, the Board
denied.
Pursuant to the Board's Order, a hearing was
held on January 19, 1967, before Jessie L. Butler,
Hearing Officer. All parties participa ted in the hear-
ing and were given full opportunity to examine and
cross-examine witnesses and to introduce evidence
bearing on the issues. On February 27, the Hearing
Officer issued and duly served upon the parties his
report and recommendation on challenged ballot. In
his report, the Hearing Officer found that on the
date of the Board election, and for sometime prior
thereto, Edward L. Pridgen possessed and exer-
cised supervisory authority, and recommended that
the challenge to Pridgen's ballot be sustained.
Thereafter, the Employer filed timely exceptions to
the Hearing Officer's Report and a motion for
reconsideration of the order granting the request for
review.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the
National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board has delegated its
powers in connection with this case to a three-
member panel.
The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Hear-
ing Officer made at the hearing and finds that no
prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are
hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Re-
gional Director's Supplemental Decision, the Peti-
tioner's request for review, the Hearing Officer's
report, the Employer's-exceptions thereto, the Em-
ployer's motion for reconsideration, and the entire
record in the case, and hereby adopts the Hearing
Officer's findings and recommendations.
In support of its present motion for reconsidera-
tion of our Order granting review and directing a
hearing to resolve the issue as to the supervisory
status of Pridgen, the Employer argues that this
whole procedure violates the rule of the Board's
Decision in Cruis Along Boats, Inc., 128 NLRB
1019. We disagree.
Unlike the situation in Cruis Along, we find that
the parties did not stipulate that Pridgen is not a su-
pervisor. Thus, the parties here did not address
themselves to the question whether Pridgen's
responsibility was characterized by any statutory
indicia of supervisory status but merely stipulated
that Pridgen worked in a job classification which
was included in the unit. On the facts presented, we
accordingly
conclude that the challenge to
Pridgen's ballot properly raised the issue of his su-
pervisory status.
As we have sustained the challenge to the ballot
of Pridgen, and as the Petitioner received a majority
of the valid ballots cast in the election, we shall cer-
tify it as the representative of the employees in the
unit found appropriate.
I All plumbers, pipefitters, heating mechanics, and laborers employed
by the Employer within the States of Maryland , Delaware, Virginia, and
Pennsylvania, excluding office clerical employees, guards, professional
employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act , as amended.
2 Petitioner, while not agreeing with or accepting the Regional
Director's findings with regard to its objections , did not seek review of the
Regional Director's rulings on the objections.
166 NLRB No. 100
ORDER
JOHN R. CROCKER CO.
853
It is hereby ordered that the Employer's second
motion for reconsideration be, and it hereby is,
denied.
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVE
It is hereby certified that Local 782, United
Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the
Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United
States and Canada, AFL-CIO, has been designated
and selected by a majority of the employees of the
Employer in the appropriate unit as their repre-
sentative for the purposes of collective bargaining,
and that, pursuant to Section 9(a) of the Act, as
amended , the said labor organization is the exclu-
sive representative of all employees in such unit for
the purposes of collective bargaining with respect
to rates of pay, wages , hours of employment, and
other conditions of employment.
308-926 0-70-55